 | Politics Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Don't have time to write this now but I think this article should include the following:
Needs to be more than blood and honour is bad, its illegal. Secretlondon 12:24, Jan 6, 2004 (UTC)
Just recently, they stabbed an antifa member in the back. http://www.indymedia.org/en/
Why not just link to the actual article instead of the site iteself? - LTC
69.123.9.255FinnMacCool
Because stabbing people isn't nice and its illegal. Ask Charlie Sargent and Martin Cross. Streona 16:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I copyedited the History section, but it still needs some cleanup. Alexiskatherine (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ian front.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There was a simply *vast* amount of encyclopedic content in that article. From "Helicopters buzzed overhead" to Ian "Relishing a pint" much of it was simply not of a suitable tone for an encyclopedia. Nor should it of held the perspective of a skinhead, as Wikipedia is not a venue for their version of accounts to be aired but strives to be objective instead.
There remain a huge amount of claims made without proper citations and I hope that another editor can rid it of the rest of them. I am not certain whether that section simply stating the Blood & Honour manifesto is really appropriate, for instance, and the claim that only a single skinhead was arrested at the "Battle of Waterloo" requires verification.
Finally it says that Donaldson went "On the radio". This is rather vague, a station would certainly be helpful and the name of the presenter that wished him good fortune even more so.
84.67.13.160 (talk) 11:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it's because I'm not a neo-nazi but, the deaths of hate-mongering fascists is hardly what I'd call tragic. Cliff Burton falling out of a tour bus to his death, now that's a tragedy. I'm going to change it to fit a more encyclopedic standard. Correct me be all means, but give reasons for doing so. JackorKnave —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.196.25 (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There, I changed "tragedy" to "deaths". May seem silly, but the use of the word "tragedy" implies sympathy. JackorKnave
The text "On August 29, 2008, the Blood & Honour internet forums were reported to have been hacked by German anti-fascist hackers, with the forum database posted online." With sources cited actually referes to a different forum. The B & H Forum has always been located at www.bloodandhonour.org/forum
