|
→White Genocide?: Reply
|
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
An attempt has been made to add [[White genocide conspiracy theory]] and [[The Great Replacement conspiracy theory]] to motives. The perpetrator was given ample opportunity to explain himself at his trial. Instead he chose not so to do. It is not for us to try to invent motives. Actually it might be better to simply remove all the motives and let the facts speak for themselves. However, some 'motives' are cited. Mind you the Washington Post reference was simply a journalist guessing that this atrocity was motivated for the same reason as a shooting in USA. (And the motive was the journo's interpretation of that shooting.) Unless the consensus is against me, I will delete the remaining uncited 'motive' as well as [[Ecofascism]]. [[User:OrewaTel|OrewaTel]] ([[User talk:OrewaTel|talk]]) 22:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC) |
An attempt has been made to add [[White genocide conspiracy theory]] and [[The Great Replacement conspiracy theory]] to motives. The perpetrator was given ample opportunity to explain himself at his trial. Instead he chose not so to do. It is not for us to try to invent motives. Actually it might be better to simply remove all the motives and let the facts speak for themselves. However, some 'motives' are cited. Mind you the Washington Post reference was simply a journalist guessing that this atrocity was motivated for the same reason as a shooting in USA. (And the motive was the journo's interpretation of that shooting.) Unless the consensus is against me, I will delete the remaining uncited 'motive' as well as [[Ecofascism]]. [[User:OrewaTel|OrewaTel]] ([[User talk:OrewaTel|talk]]) 22:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:These are well sourced in the article. Why don't they belong in cats? I see nowhere that anyone here has invented any motives. And, I don't think what a mass murderer says in a trial means much. [[User:Objective3000|O3000, Ret.]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 22:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC) |
:These are well sourced in the article. Why don't they belong in cats? I see nowhere that anyone here has invented any motives. And, I don't think what a mass murderer says in a trial means much. [[User:Objective3000|O3000, Ret.]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 22:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:While I agree that great care needs to be taken with categories there is the title of the manifesto. [[User:Aircorn|Air<b style="color: green;">''corn''</b>]] [[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 23:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC) |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christchurch mosque shootings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Other talk page banners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Current/recent consensuses:
|
The Islamophobia Template has been added. This results in an intrusive infobox that interrupts reading of the article without adding any new information. It is arguable that Tarrant was a racist rather than an Islamophobe. The template was the subject of a deletion debate [1] which collapsed into 'No Consensus'. I prefer the article without this template. Should it be removed? OrewaTel (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
what exactly did far right politics in Australia have to do with the attack, i know that the perpetrator was Australian-born but i don't see any link from the attack to any politics in Australia Joshville (talk) 08:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An attempt has been made to add White genocide conspiracy theory and The Great Replacement conspiracy theory to motives. The perpetrator was given ample opportunity to explain himself at his trial. Instead he chose not so to do. It is not for us to try to invent motives. Actually it might be better to simply remove all the motives and let the facts speak for themselves. However, some 'motives' are cited. Mind you the Washington Post reference was simply a journalist guessing that this atrocity was motivated for the same reason as a shooting in USA. (And the motive was the journo's interpretation of that shooting.) Unless the consensus is against me, I will delete the remaining uncited 'motive' as well as Ecofascism. OrewaTel (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]