Contents

Talk:Christkind: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:46, 14 December 2009

Holidays: Christmas Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Christianity: Christmas Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Kristkind is just a variant spelling of Christkind, the proper term. Why there are separate articles is beyond me. -- Svenman (talk) 19:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am from south of Germany and never saw the spelling Kristkind before. The proper spelling would be Christkind that's why I also recommend to merge it. The figure described is for sure the same. --84.153.18.141 (talk) 08:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8405501.stm seems relevant to this article. Sorry I'm not really sure how to edit, or what the guidelines are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.15.21 (talk) 05:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be nice, thanks - it's what I came looking for and it's not presently on the page. Not knowing it, I can't add it. --62.58.152.52 (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]