Contents

Talk:Claudia Ciesla: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:04, 25 January 2008

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 Oct 2007. The result of the discussion was No consensus.

Archive 1

Absolutely agree on that. I guess that she made it on her own.. just check in the internet, she has several webpages and tries to promote herself in this way! If wiki is non-commercial, It has to be deleted!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.53.31 (talk) 17:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect this article against vandalism. These statements are false and made most probably by the same stalker, who tried to delete this article in English Wikipedia and Italian Wikipedia many times and never succeeded. He is using always exactly the same false arguments, that nobody knows this lady (unless she was published many times and is featered model of BILD - 3d biggest newspaper worldwide). He is working with many fake emails. Please see the former deleting discussions. Further discussion is needless as all was discussed with the same false statements of the Stalker and disproved again and again. Claudia is not only known in Germany but also in many other countries and also in India. Please see her first Fan Page in India: http://www.cclaudia.info/. --59.92.110.132 (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aprod nomination is not vandalism. It's readily apparent to anyone what's going on with this article, and it's not winning their position any support, so don't worry about it. --Haemo (talk) 19:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at how many times the prod templates has been placed on this article it is bordering on it though. Nevetheless, just remove the tag and ignore it for the rest. This article will never be deleted by the proposed deletion process. Garion96 (talk) 20:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This interview is a fake!!!!!!!!!!!! It was done with her boss!!! Just check the page!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.177.52 (talk) 23:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK: 1. "CCLAUDIA" was four times in BILD - a kind of yellow press newspaper which is in Germany not even legally anymore entitled to be called "newspaper". It shows every day another half-naked women and a nice story is invented to the pic. The girls there are totally unknown in the country. 2. CClaudia is on this "XING" with another half naked picture. XING is a network with the aim to get as many contacts as possible. To have 1000 there is quite a usual number. YES - very hard to imagine how she got 4750 contacts, when she accepts every man writing to her.....or? ;))) 3. This interview is a fake. It is on the homepage of a smaller casting-agency. This interview is a kind of "self made" one. 4. This FAMOUS series (soap) is an INTERNET ONE (NOT TV). It is SO FAMOUS THAT IT EVEN DOES NOT HAS A WIKI PAGE!!! Everybody can make nowadays his own soap...5. Sorry, but not everybody who thinks that this is not enough for a wiki page, is a freak. I personally dont know her - and I have personally nothing against her. If we take every girl who was in Bild (this newspaper is 60 years old and had every year more than 350 girls in it - we can make an own wiki for babes ;)))) I would ask the administrators (maybe a German one who know that she is a nobody) to delete the page. Its pretty obvious that she misunderstands the sense of wikipedia as an encyclopedia. Wikipedia IS NOT XING and it is NOT A PRIVATE HOMEPAGE for starlets. We do not have to compare our wiki with Britanica - but is there anybody seriously thinking that any encyclopedia would print her name??? PLEASE NOTE: Obviously it will not take long until she herself or/and with a faked user account will reply to this message.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.219.244.145 (talk) 20:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry folks,

this person is totally unknown in germany. All sources are just made by someone who wants to promote her. In the german part of wikipeadia this would be deleted without any problems. Why not delete it here too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.142.194.63 (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She isn't "totally unknown", although her prominence mostly depends on internet-promotion and moronic tabloid. She is at least an example for successful internet-promotion. Not more, even not less. Carolus Ludovicus (talk) 22:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who is CClaudia???? Maybe I should write a wiki about my dog.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.13.170.2 (talk) 10:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

if your dog manages to get 4750 people to actively confirm you as a contact in xing - maybe you then you should. however, think about her whatever you want: if 4750 people confirm they know you and another 670.000 people read (or at least look at) your profile - you are not un-known.