|
Output map
|
No edit summary
|
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Output map== |
==Output map== |
||
This looks wrong. Each circle is said to represent a % of the top producer. The top producer is given as one country (Italy) but a number of circles of given for single countries (for example 9 in China) Surely the map should be based on countries aolone, or individual companies alone. The present design is a mess. |
This looks wrong. Each circle is said to represent a % of the top producer. The top producer is given as one country (Italy) but a number of circles of given for single countries (for example 9 in China) Surely the map should be based on countries aolone, or individual companies alone. The present design is a mess. |
||
==Images== |
|||
Please can someone give an idea of size, such as a scale bar. This is very basic stuff. Not including these is bad practice and makes the images of very little value. |
|||
 | Geology Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
What does pegmatite dikes mean?
Can someone help me out with the geological definition of dike at dike? Extend it to a dike (geology) page if you like... Thanks. dave 17:18 16 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Done - or at least started. Dike (geology) --Vsmith 03:16, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Funnily enough, on the German Wikipedia page for Feldspar the first part of the word Feldspat "feld" is explained to have its origin in the Swedish language with『fjäll』meaning hill, mountain. I'm also not so sure about your explaination for "spat" as well. I think I heard that its origin might be German ("spalten") with the meaning cleavable. Alex, Austria
Please can someone give an idea of size, such as a scale bar. This is very basic stuff. Not including these is bad practice and makes the images of very little value.
This looks wrong. Each circle is said to represent a % of the top producer. The top producer is given as one country (Italy) but a number of circles of given for single countries (for example 9 in China) Surely the map should be based on countries aolone, or individual companies alone. The present design is a mess.
Please can someone give an idea of size, such as a scale bar. This is very basic stuff. Not including these is bad practice and makes the images of very little value.
