→GA Review: Question...
|
No edit summary
|
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
::It looks quite a bit better, but I don't have time to do a more thorough re-review at the moment. I should be able to this weekend. Note I've left further clarification on one of the notes above. [[User:TUF-KAT|Tuf-Kat]] ([[User talk:TUF-KAT|talk]]) 03:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC) |
::It looks quite a bit better, but I don't have time to do a more thorough re-review at the moment. I should be able to this weekend. Note I've left further clarification on one of the notes above. [[User:TUF-KAT|Tuf-Kat]] ([[User talk:TUF-KAT|talk]]) 03:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::Just noting (since the weekend is over globally now I think) that I may not be online at some point for a few days so would be unable to check this as I have been doing until I return. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|•]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 12:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC) |
:::Just noting (since the weekend is over globally now I think) that I may not be online at some point for a few days so would be unable to check this as I have been doing until I return. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|•]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 12:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
::::Sorry, I had some real-life stuff come up, I'm passing it now. [[User:TUF-KAT|Tuf-Kat]] ([[User talk:TUF-KAT|talk]]) 06:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC) |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
A few significant problems:
Tuf-Kat (talk) 01:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I will recheck the article for these points and remove the overdetail. --candle•wicke 16:29, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]