|
|
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*'''Support''', article subject is the phrase, not the song(s).--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 08:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Support''', article subject is the phrase, not the song(s).--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 08:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' again. I would have appreciated notification of the reopening of discussion. Most of the article is clearly about the songs which bear the title; as such there's nothing wrong with using title case. [[User:LtPowers|Powers]] <sup><small><small>[[User talk:LtPowers|T]]</small></small></sup> 20:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' again. I would have appreciated notification of the reopening of discussion. Most of the article is clearly about the songs which bear the title; as such there's nothing wrong with using title case. [[User:LtPowers|Powers]] <sup><small><small>[[User talk:LtPowers|T]]</small></small></sup> 20:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
::That would only make sense to me if the subject of the article actually was one of those songs. As long as the subject is the phrase (and the songs are mentioned merely as a use of that phrase), it's misleading to readers to title the article with caps.--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 23:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC) |
Songs C‑class | |||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move Mike Cline (talk) 21:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here's Your Mule → Here's your mule – – per MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The request to rename this article to Here's your mule has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Here's Your Mule → Here's your mule – I looked at how to implement the idea from the first RM about making the article about the song, but I couldn't see a way to do that. There are various songs going along with the various phrases mentioned in the lead, and the article is more about the phrase and its origin and influence than about one or more songs in particular. Since that's where we are, I don't see how we can justify keeping it capitalized. Hopefully we'll get more comments this time, or avoid the oppostion. Dicklyon (talk) 08:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]