|
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Chemicals}}.
|
→moving alternative materials down: new section
|
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
Should the article better explain the difference between (bulk) conductivity and [[sheet conductivity]]? Often in thin layer materials, it is the latter that is important. [[User:Gah4|Gah4]] ([[User talk:Gah4|talk]]) 18:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC) |
Should the article better explain the difference between (bulk) conductivity and [[sheet conductivity]]? Often in thin layer materials, it is the latter that is important. [[User:Gah4|Gah4]] ([[User talk:Gah4|talk]]) 18:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
== moving alternative materials down == |
|||
Seems to me that the discussion of alternative materials shouldn't be so highly featured in the article. It should be at the end, if it's there at all. |
|||
--however, some of the alternate materials are simply variants of ITO, which reasonably should be featured here. [[User:Geoffrey.landis|Geoffrey.landis]] ([[User talk:Geoffrey.landis|talk]]) 20:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This link to reuters is broken and I can't find a replacement. Probably should remove it or cite it unlinked.
How about a picture and conductivity value? lysdexia 05:49, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Whay was it so expensive in '39? Military applications?
I don't have time right now, but I'm surprised no one bothered to state the conduction mechanism... I'll put it up later if no one else does.
(PS Yes, for those that could guess, I'm in materials science :) However, I'm new to the field)
I am interested in making ITO films (about 0.35 micron thick) on glass by dip-coat and then pyrolysis. Anyone knows how to formulate a suitable "dip solution" and the baking achedule pls email to:
kanak53@hotmail.com
Thanks in advance.
I think the sentence that says that graphene films have lower resistivity than ITO films is wrong, even though the cited article says so. That article doesn't cite anything, so the information is not verifiable. I am a student and for the thesis I'm working on graphene and from the academic literature I have read that the state of the art graphene films have about 100 the resistance of comparable ITO films. I'm new to the field, so I cannot say anything for sure nor cite an article, but a quick research on sciencedirec.com indicates that the statement is wrong. What should I do? Remove the sentence? 22 Jan 2015
There have been rumors that the Sony Alpha series Digital Single-Lens Reflex cameras (DSLRs) as well as the Canon EOS 5D have a thin sheet of glass, coated with an extremely fragile and easily scratched / peeled / damaged ITO layer, sitting in front of their sensors' anti-alias filters. It's speculated that the thin layer of glass might be an infrared-absorbing filter; furthermore, the ITO coating might act as a dielectric hot mirror, thus increasing the infrared rejection, and that the ITO layer's conductivity might help dissipate electrical charges and hence minimize the buildup of dust- and particle-attracting static electricity on the filter's surface. Any confirmation as to whether ITO is indeed used by digital camera manufacturers, as well as its role (as a dichromatic interference filter and/or anti-static coating) would be appreciated, and could be usefully added to the "Applications" section of the main article. 213.224.83.4 17:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
anybody know regarding whether isopropyl alcohol reacts with the ito surface or not,and other concern is that is isopropyl alcohol modifies the surface chemistry of ito. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.212.4.240 (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the appropriate section of the Zinc oxide article the ITO is mentioned as more "poisonous" than the oxide being discussed. Are there any references on this topic? --Esmu Igors (talk) 17:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this article on the particular hazards of ITO would help: http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/108/2/472.full.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.243.250 (talk) 10:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure if this is the current place to request it - but AZO should have its own page -- even the zinc oxide page does not mention it. It is well established in the literature.-- --Wendsjinnit (talk) 04:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The first sentence in this section is highly questionable. ITO is not that expensive. Someone with more experience should provide a reference for that statement. Clearton11 (talk) 02:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Indium tin oxide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indium tin oxide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag to http://www.ncsu.edu/chemistry/franzen/public_html/sf/ito/index.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article doesn't give any history, like the year that it was first found or used. That might be nice to know. Gah4 (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should the article better explain the difference between (bulk) conductivity and sheet conductivity? Often in thin layer materials, it is the latter that is important. Gah4 (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to me that the discussion of alternative materials shouldn't be so highly featured in the article. It should be at the end, if it's there at all. --however, some of the alternate materials are simply variants of ITO, which reasonably should be featured here. Geoffrey.landis (talk) 20:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
