|
|
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:Would you consider ''Metal Gear Rising'' a part of the main series for being canon to the established ''Metal Gear Solid'' continuity, despite the fact that developers stated that it is a spin-off? Or how about the 2012 ''Tomb Raider''? That game is a reboot, but is still considered apart of the main series. [[User:Sarujo|Sarujo]] ([[User talk:Sarujo|talk]]) 03:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC) |
:Would you consider ''Metal Gear Rising'' a part of the main series for being canon to the established ''Metal Gear Solid'' continuity, despite the fact that developers stated that it is a spin-off? Or how about the 2012 ''Tomb Raider''? That game is a reboot, but is still considered apart of the main series. [[User:Sarujo|Sarujo]] ([[User talk:Sarujo|talk]]) 03:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
::I like the idea of calling them "Other games" rather then Spin-offs. I don't consider them spin-offs, but they really aren't part of the "Main series". The compromise of "Other games" sounds reasonable. <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Blake|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>([[User talk:Blake#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Blake|Edits]])</sup> 03:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC) |
::I like the idea of calling them "Other games" rather then Spin-offs. I don't consider them spin-offs, but they really aren't part of the "Main series". The compromise of "Other games" sounds reasonable. <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Blake|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>([[User talk:Blake#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Blake|Edits]])</sup> 03:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
Alright ''Other games'' is fine will me as well. ---''[[User:StevenBjerke|<span style="color:limegreen">'''Steven'''</span>]][[User talk:StevenBjerke|<span style="color:black">'''Bjerke'''</span>]]'' 16:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC) |
It says that The Lost Frontier is part of the main series, but it really isn't. I've tried to change this, but people change it back. It definately isn't a main series game because in the opening credits, it says "BASED on the franchise developed by Naughty Dog." I hope to change it, but like I say people keep changing it. Please, this needs to be changed it's wrong, so if I do change it, please don't change it back User:MatoroFreeze 16:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An HD Collection has been included in the list of games in the franchise, this should be deleted because the only link provided says that this is a rumon. If it is needed on the page, put in a future catagory and mention that it is a rumor. Please delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.201.211 (talk) 04:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A trailer was released. It is not a rumor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.153.3.255 (talk) 21:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
These seems to be dispute going with new information regarding the franchise's future. So BRD cycle must be used. Sarujo (talk) 16:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that Naughty Dog considered making a new Jak and Daxter game for the PS3 is very important so I don't see why Jack Fisher kept reverting my edits and not giving a logical reason why. Anyway now that the topic has it's own section I guess the edit war is over. ---StevenBjerke 16:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why some people seem to think that Daxter and Jak X are spin-offs when in reality they are both 100 % canon. Their are numerous references in Jak X to Daxter and references to Jak X in TLF. It's been confirmed many times that both are canon and I can provide over a dozen links that support it. If anyone has any objection to this please say so otherwise I will continue to revert the edits of the people who continue to add the games into the spin-off category. Thank you. ---StevenBjerke 21:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright Other games is fine will me as well. ---StevenBjerke 16:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]