Contents

Talk:Karl Schwarzschild

Template:Vital article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Germany Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Biography / European / German / World War I Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force European military history task force German military history task force World War I task force Physics: Relativity / Biographies Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the relativity task force. This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce. Astronomy Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is this man listed as a German Scientist? I see nothing in this article to indicate that he is German. (written by User:24.141.214.87 on May 17th, 2005)

The first sentence says Karl Schwarzschild (October 9, 1873 - May 11, 1916) was a noted German Jewish physicist and astronomer. -- Austrian 17:36, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

And why Jewish? Is that important or even significant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.70.19.210 (talk) 09:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given the time he lived in, yes it is important and significant due to how the social situation in his native Germany influenced his life. This article should be expanded to include such details only if this article is to be biographical and not simply a summary. 24.188.207.20 (talk) 16:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I edited an earlier version of this article and had been monitoring it for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.

Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive. I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions.

Unfortunately, Schwarzschild's contributions to the theory of black hole are disputed by many cranks and also by some fringe physicists who maintain that his solution as originally presented does not correspond to the same family of vacuum solutions described by the name "Schwarzschild vacuum solution" in mainstream gtr textbooks. According to these fringe physicists, the so-called "original version" does not describe a black hole. This view is mistaken and rests upon an elementary misunderstanding of the radial coordinate in what are now called Schwarzschild coordinates (which, confusingly, is in fact not the same as the coordinate used in the original paper). Nonetheless this claim is promoted in some arXiv eprints, which have either gone unpublished or have been published in second rate journals (but should not have been published, since they are manifestly mathematically incorrect). Another fringe physicist has claimed in several arXiv eprints that the Kruskal Szekeres coordinates are not well defined. This is another mathematical error.

Given this, it is likely that at least some future versions of this article will contain misinformation about Schwarzschild's contributions to physics. In particular, it is likely that future versions will contain external links to mathematically erroneous fringe physics eprints which will however most likely be misleadingly portrayed as having been accepted in mainstream physics, which is certainly not true.

Good luck to all students in your search for information, regardless!---CH 01:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I could not agree more with the above. Students, beware of cranks and fringe physicists. But, just in case, beware also of any physicist who claims anybody who disagrees with his majority views is a crank just for that reason. Read Schwarzschild for yourselves. Using your own judgement when it really matters, that's what being a scientist is about. English translations of Schwarzschild's original papers are available on arxiv.org, thanks to some "fringe crank". Also read this letter by Schwarzschild to Einstein, in which he warns explicitly for not using his "R" as an "r". Unfortunately it is now "standard" to do just that.

Aoosten (talk) 19:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[From Terry0051]

1. The section above starting "I could not agree more" was posted by Aoosten (who is kindly requested please to sign his posts using 4 tildes).
2. The section was posted on 5 September 2009, and Aoosten is also kindly requested please to start new sections at the foot of the page.
3. Aoosten either misunderstands or incorrectly represents the letter of Schwarzschild to which he refers. The German-language passage about the two different radial variables talks about the difference between them, and says "which is a difference of the order 10^-12, thus in practice absolutely equivalent" ("was ein Unterschied von der Ordnung 10^-12 ist, also praktisch absolut gleichgueltig"). While I've no doubt that situations can easily be imagined and discussed which are not the practical situations envisaged by Schwarzschild, and in which the two radial variables are no longer equivalent, it does not help the present discussion to characterize Schwarzschild's message incorrectly. Terry0051 (talk) 22:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[From aoosten]

It seemed to me that my note should appear immediately after the "Students beware".

As to your third point, I believe quoted Schwarzschild correctly. He explicitly states that not r but R should be used. After this assertion Schwarzschild states that for the Mercury perihelion shift this makes no practical difference. You quote only the latter assertion. Also the wiki article states that Schwarzschild's solution has a singularity at the so called Schwarzschild radius. Anyone with access to the internet can see for him- or herself that this is not correct.

Aoosten (talk) 19:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone expand this part of the article? It may have been overblown with older edits on Albert Einstein but its definitely worth noting it details. 141.211.251.69 18:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another Schwarzschild article has been created, specifically dealing with his famous "Schwarzschild Solution" dealing with Einstein's general relativity in space. It doesn't seem a big enough topic are to be its own page, and so I have proposed it be merged here.

User:RideABicycle/Signature 22:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I think it is a shame that all his works on stellar interiors are not being cited here. Schwarzschild was a major pioneer in the filed, introducing the concepts of radiative equilibrium and local thermodynamic equilibruim, and giving the first steps toward what we know today as stellar astrophysics. His works are commonly cited by people like Eddington and Chandrasekhar, given their relevance.

If anyone here have access to translations of Schwarzschild's papers (if such translations do exist) or a satisfactory understanding of the German language to read the originals, I think it would worth to mention these works here.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seneika (talk • contribs) 23:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think IPA pronounciation of his name should be included.Daniel bg (talk) 02:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page says he provided the first solution to Einstein's field equations of general relativity in 1915, but the page on general relativity says that Einstein published the equation in 1916. Could I please have clarification?

Some sources give 1916 as the year Schwarzschild found his solution. This is just sloppy research given the fact that his letter to Einstein containing the relevant formula is dated 22 December 1915. They probably just use the date of the appearance of Schwarzschild's result in print. JanBielawski (talk) 23:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would be nice to provide a better translation of Schwarzschild's letter to Einstein than that rather dreadful one given in the article's Reference section. JanBielawski (talk) 23:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Schwarzschild also contributed significantly (AFAIK) to Klein and Sommerfeld's 4-volume treatise Über die Theorie des Kreisels (The Theory of the Top - first 3 volumes recently translated to English). One of the volumes treats astronomical applications of the theory of the spinning top and Sommerfeld didn't feel fully qualified to write this portion so he asked Schwarzschild for help (while letting him know only he [Sommerfeld] would be listed as the author "for consistency reasons"). Schwarzschild agreed and of course the credit is given to him in the book's foreword. JanBielawski (talk) 23:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the above request for a link to English translations of original papers by Schwarzschild:

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9905030 (Point mass)

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9912033 (Incompressible sphere)

http://www.gsjournal.net/old/eeuro/vankov.pdf (the letter from which I quote above)

The papers were based on an earlier version of GRT communicated by Einstein in 1915.

Aoosten (talk) 20:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The text states the Schwarzschild's solution is "a minor modification" of Schwarzschild's original results.

I invite the critical student to investigate that so-called "minor" modification.

Aoosten (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "Schwarzschild's first (spherically symmetric) solution does not contain a coordinate singularity on a surface that is now named after him." This looks like someone has inserted the italic words 'does not' here, which is incorrect. There is a coordinate singularity at r_s = 2GM/c^2 in Schwarzschild's formulation - in later Eddington-Finklestein coordinates, which are a revised version of Schwarzschild's solution, there is no coordinate singularity at this point. I'm just a student so I haven't edited directly. I agree, that should be fixed.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.101.112.64 (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction to the article says Schwarzchild died of pemphigus. The body says he "may" have died of it. Which? IAmNitpicking (talk) 03:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karl Schwarzschild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D58230
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D58114
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D36450
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D57298
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D57299
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D57299
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D58241
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D62941
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D63058
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D244900
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/contentserver/contentserver?command=docconvert&docid=D244507
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060617222412/http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/schwarzschild.htmltohttp://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/schwarzschild.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to what I know his name would be pronounced [ˈʃvaɐ̯tsʃɪld] with a d aat the end and not with a t.Ontologix (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• “Schild” is written with a 〈d〉, because the word can be expanded into forms like “Schilder” or “Schildes” that are actually pronounced with a [d]. But “Schild” itself is pronounced with a [t] at the and. The process is called Auslautverhärtung.
• The letter 〈r〉 is pronounced [ʁ] only in the onset of a syllable. In the coda of a syllable, it is pronounced [ɐ̯], with two exceptions: 〈er〉 ususally becomes [ɐ] (not [ɛɐ̯]), and 〈ar〉becomes [aː]. You don’t hear a difference between “Karl” and “kahl” (both [kaːl]), “Harn” and “Hahn” (both [haːn]) etc.

So, in standard German, “Karl Schwarzschild” is pronounced [kaːl ˈʃvaːtsʃɪlt]. -- Sloyment (talk) 21:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So why was Schwarzchild's nationality changed to Jewish? He was Germany by birth and citizenship, and "Jewish" is not a nationality in the first place, at least since the Romans assumed direct rule of Judea. IAmNitpicking (talk) 19:35, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]