→POV problems: template removed
|
added wikiproject templates
|
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=start|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=start|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Discrimination}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Organizations}} |
|||
{{WikiProject France}} |
|||
==LICRA== |
==LICRA== |
Human rights Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Discrimination Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Organizations Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
France Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
There should maybe be a note on MRAP's relations with LICRA. While LICRA is primarly focused on antisemitism, MRAP appears to be more interested in islamophobia. However, since there are numerous conflicts between Jews and Muslims, it would seem pertinent to see how those two associations deal with each other. ADM (talk)
User:RolandR reverted edits neutralising the POV tone of the prose, claiming "lack of citation", however the issue with the article is rather the presentation of this controversial organisation in breathless glowing terms within the prose itself, couching what their political opinions are as if they were objective fact; gospel, in grand heroic fashion, for instance we have "in the struggle against", "the fight against", "racists", "rights", etc, rather than neutral adstractions. According to the profile of the initiating reverter, they identify as a London Jewish Trotskyist, thus there is significant reason to suspect politically motivated bias behind the revert (the subject of the article was originally founded primarily by members of the French Communist Party, many of them Jews, to howl "racist!", "fascist!", "antisemite!" against French people). Rí Lughaid (talk) 11:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]