This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
There should maybe be a note on MRAP's relations with LICRA. While LICRA is primarly focused on antisemitism, MRAP appears to be more interested in islamophobia. However, since there are numerous conflicts between Jews and Muslims, it would seem pertinent to see how those two associations deal with each other. ADM (talk)
POV problems
User:RolandR reverted edits neutralising the POV tone of the prose, claiming "lack of citation", however the issue with the article is rather the presentation of this controversial organisation in breathless glowing terms within the prose itself, couching what their political opinions are as if they were objective fact; gospel, in grand heroic fashion, for instance we have "in the struggle against", "the fight against", "racists", "rights", etc, rather than neutral adstractions. According to the profile of the initiating reverter, they identify as a London Jewish Trotskyist, thus there is significant reason to suspect politically motivated bias behind the revert (the subject of the article was originally founded primarily by members of the French Communist Party, many of them Jews, to howl "racist!", "fascist!", "antisemite!" against French people). Rí Lughaid (talk) 11:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed this template per #3 in the instructions at Template:POV:
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
This is without prejudice one way or the other to the argument presented above, which I'd still encourage the editor to seek resolution of. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on MRAP (NGO). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.