Contents

Talk:Microsoft Windows: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:00, 21 February 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microsoft Windows article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days

	Microsoft Windows was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 3, 2006 Good article nominee Listed August 4, 2007 Good article reassessment Delisted May 19, 2008 Peer review Reviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Vital article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Apps C‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Contribute to the project: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagramto good article status Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles Brands C‑class Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing: Software C‑class Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Top-importance). Microsoft: Windows C‑class Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Microsoft Windows (assessed as Top-importance). Technology C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Move logs: Microsoft Windows Windows Discussions: RM, Microsoft Windows → Windows, Not moved, 29 January 2018, discussion RM, Microsoft Windows → Windows, Not moved, 23 November 2022, discussion

Freedows OS was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 January 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Microsoft Windows on 27 January 2013. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Flying Windows was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 August 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Microsoft Windows. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

window5825towindow10

NT 11.0 Doesn't exist. Windows 11 still uses NT 10.0.

Please update: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Suite_des_versions_de_Windows.svg/700px-Suite_des_versions_de_Windows.svg.png TpapTheTechEnthusiast (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to Operating System Version - Win32 apps, both Windows 10 and Windows 11 are Windows NT 10.0. The picture should be revised. --Yejianfei (talk) 13:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TpapTheTechEnthusiast Irmanfauzi33 (talk) 09:25, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Windows → Windows – The correct name of the operating system is simply "Windows". Windows already redirects here; the plural form provides sufficient disambiguation from "window" per WP:PLURALPT. RoanDM (talk) 23:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose per Britannica "Microsoft Windows" is the correct name. Windows should probably go to the DAB but it was discussed recently at RFD with consensus to keep but that doesn't mean we should move the OS there. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, the plural of windows is a much longer known usage (WP:time immemorial?) and would agree that if anything it could go to the DAB page (but maybe should remain as a redirect here). A product name does not supercede historical usage and long-term significance. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support There's a clear naming convention in use that software does not generally include the manufacturer name in the title. macOS not Apple MacOS, OS/2 not IBM OS/2, Ubuntu not Canonical Ubuntu, CP/M not Digital Research CP/M. Microsoft's own branding prior to 2008 was hit or miss on whether it included "Microsoft" when referring to Windows as a product. Since at least 2008, "Microsoft" has been consistently left out of the product name. The product name is "Windows", and does not need to be preceded by Microsoft, and by tradition of other similar titles on Wikipedia, should not include Microsoft. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 12:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• How about dem Apples?Randy Kryn (talk) 12:25, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Commment, I've added a hatnote to Window to this page. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Windows should clearly point to the disambiguation page. The current title is a very commonly used name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Do not move this is not needed. 174.27.66.83 (talk) 18:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  This very recently went to RfD [1] where the primary redirect was upheld. 162 etc. (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Not again, no, no, no. real world. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose WP:IFITAINTBROKE. Windows can continue to redirect here with a hatnote for explanation. cookie monster 755 18:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose move. Even though "Windows" redirects here, I think the current title is better as it helps readers who are looking for the Window article know they have come to the wrong place. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I don't understand why we need to duplicate this text across two articles, so I'm proposing a merge. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 21:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I'd have boldly redirected it, if it hadn't already been done & reverted. No reason to split it from the parent article. I generally like related topics being merged together into coherent comprehensive articles, rather than giving every single notable topic its own article. DFlhb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This split was performed just two days ago. I've simply reverted the split, clearly the change is controversial and an editor wishing to split it would need to gain consensus before doing so again. —Locke Cole • t • c 18:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]