→Sumerian Monochord?: new section
|
|
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
You can't make up a new name for an instrument based on your logic. In your case a "piano" would be a misnomer too because it doesn't always generate soft sound. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.169.193.169|67.169.193.169]] ([[User talk:67.169.193.169|talk]]) 20:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
You can't make up a new name for an instrument based on your logic. In your case a "piano" would be a misnomer too because it doesn't always generate soft sound. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.169.193.169|67.169.193.169]] ([[User talk:67.169.193.169|talk]]) 20:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:Not true. "Piano" isn't a misnomer, it's an abbreviation of the original name, which was ''pianoforte'' -- e.g., "soft - loud". |
|||
:"Monochord", OTOH, specifically describes an instrument with only '''one''' string. This is borne out through instrument naming conventions across multiple cultures. With the Greek bouzouki for example: "trechorde" = three courses; "tetrachorde" = four courses; the Venezuelan "cuatro" = four courses; the Bolivian "seis" = six strings; etc. |
|||
== To add to article == |
== To add to article == |
![]() | Music theory Start‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | Musical Instruments Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrumentorcomponentbeuploadedtoWikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
I've heard the monochord attributed to Boethius, amd Guido certainly makes reference to it, but Pythagoras? Do we have a source for this? - Rainwarrior 02:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The first monochord treatises is Sectio Canonis (Division of the Monochord) and is believed to be written around 2-3 cent. BCE. Author is disputed. It is commonly called "the Euclidian" Sectio Canonis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.193.169 (talk) 20:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the following:
Neither of the suggested ideas of Mersenne are relevant here, but it is true that he studied tuning, and may be true that he used a monochord in his experiments. However, the statement as it is appears to be too vague to be useful. - Rainwarrior (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the monochord pictured in the article have two strings? JSC ltd (talk) 18:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the picture is not actually a monochord, but a "tromba marina" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.30.0.165 (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This paragraph, which was in the article, seems to me to belong on the talk page:
[This following section needs significant revision to include Boethius, Ptolemy (his own harmonic system for the cosmos, as well as his lengthy descriptions of monochord theory), Pythagorean tradition, Plato, Platonism, and Neoplatonic material and probably some Aristoxenus as a counter to numerical idealsim, not to mention Gaffurius, Ramis, Euclid, Kepler, and a host of other references. Jumping to Robert Fludd and the description provided is misleading, although his image of a monochord in the work cited is much more accurate than the marine trumpet (a bowed harmonic instrument) previously shown in this article.]
And boldly I have moved it here. Good to hear someone mention the word references.
Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is incorrect: "A misconception of the term lies within its name. Often a monochord has more than one string, most of the time two, one open string and a second string with a movable bridge."
A monochord has only one string: mono = one ; chord = string .
An instrument with two strings would be a bichord. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You can't make up a new name for an instrument based on your logic. In your case a "piano" would be a misnomer too because it doesn't always generate soft sound. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.193.169 (talk) 20:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To add to article: did the Ancient Greeks call the monochord κανών? 173.89.236.187 (talk) 00:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article referenced by the claim of monochord having been mentioned in Sumerian texts seems to be rather rare and inaccessible to me. I haven't been able to verify the claim by any assyriological sources, and knowing how hard it is to determine exactly what is described by any technical term in Sumerian, I'd say the claim is somewhat doubtful at least, even if not impossible. Should be checked by publicly available sources focusing on Ancient Mesopotamian musicology. --Oop (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]