→Where is the neutrality discussion?: new section
|
|
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
A neutrality-disputed tag was added to the article recently, but there seems to be no discussion of it here. I thought the rules required posting an explanation on the talk page when adding that tag. The same anonymous user, when posting the tag, made some minor edits to improve neutrality, and I don't disagree with those edits; but the points they edited don't seem to have been big enough to warrant flagging the entire article as disputed. [[Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:13E0:7AD:0:0:0:2|2607:FEA8:13E0:7AD:0:0:0:2]] ([[User talk:2607:FEA8:13E0:7AD:0:0:0:2|talk]]) 10:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC) |
A neutrality-disputed tag was added to the article recently, but there seems to be no discussion of it here. I thought the rules required posting an explanation on the talk page when adding that tag. The same anonymous user, when posting the tag, made some minor edits to improve neutrality, and I don't disagree with those edits; but the points they edited don't seem to have been big enough to warrant flagging the entire article as disputed. [[Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:13E0:7AD:0:0:0:2|2607:FEA8:13E0:7AD:0:0:0:2]] ([[User talk:2607:FEA8:13E0:7AD:0:0:0:2|talk]]) 10:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC) |
||
:You are right. The tag was added in a [[WP:DRIVEBY]] and no talk discussion was ever initiated. I have removed it as stale. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 11:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC) |
![]() | Russia: History / Religion / Demographics & ethnography C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Christianity: Theology / Eastern O. C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Congratulations on making it to today's listing on the "Did You Know..." section of Wikipedia Main Page. The process of making it the listing takes a bit of effort and involves the quick cooperation of many editors. All involved deserve recognition, appreciation, thanks and applause.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A neutrality-disputed tag was added to the article recently, but there seems to be no discussion of it here. I thought the rules required posting an explanation on the talk page when adding that tag. The same anonymous user, when posting the tag, made some minor edits to improve neutrality, and I don't disagree with those edits; but the points they edited don't seem to have been big enough to warrant flagging the entire article as disputed. 2607:FEA8:13E0:7AD:0:0:0:2 (talk) 10:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]