m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Pitch (music)/Archive 3) (bot
|
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* <nowiki>[[Helmholtz pitch notation#Staff representation|"German method" of octave nomenclature]]</nowiki> The anchor (#Staff representation) is no longer available because it was [[Special:Diff/1009518045|deleted by a user]] before. <!-- {"title":"Staff representation","appear":{"revid":148908681,"parentid":148908461,"timestamp":"2007-08-03T11:05:15Z","removed_section_titles":["Virtual piano"],"added_section_titles":["History","Usage","Variations","Staff representation","References","External links"]},"disappear":{"revid":1009518045,"parentid":979986479,"timestamp":"2021-03-01T00:33:25Z","removed_section_titles":["CITEREFHelmholtz1885","Usage","Staff representation"],"added_section_titles":["CITEREFSchmidt-Jones","CITEREFvon Helmholtz1885","CITEREFBlood","Use","Octave and staff representation","Notes"]}} --> |
* <nowiki>[[Helmholtz pitch notation#Staff representation|"German method" of octave nomenclature]]</nowiki> The anchor (#Staff representation) is no longer available because it was [[Special:Diff/1009518045|deleted by a user]] before. <!-- {"title":"Staff representation","appear":{"revid":148908681,"parentid":148908461,"timestamp":"2007-08-03T11:05:15Z","removed_section_titles":["Virtual piano"],"added_section_titles":["History","Usage","Variations","Staff representation","References","External links"]},"disappear":{"revid":1009518045,"parentid":979986479,"timestamp":"2021-03-01T00:33:25Z","removed_section_titles":["CITEREFHelmholtz1885","Usage","Staff representation"],"added_section_titles":["CITEREFSchmidt-Jones","CITEREFvon Helmholtz1885","CITEREFBlood","Use","Octave and staff representation","Notes"]}} --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== English-language bias == |
|||
The statement that pitches are designated by letters is only true in some languages, including English. Other languages may use other terminology, such as do-re-mi. In fact, this becomes clear if you click on translations of this article into languages such as French. [[Special:Contributions/73.137.170.88|73.137.170.88]] ([[User talk:73.137.170.88|talk]]) 22:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, this ''is'' the English language Wikipedia; we do, therefore, use English terminology. [[User:Firejuggler86|Firejuggler86]] ([[User talk:Firejuggler86|talk]]) 09:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Pitch and noise are not antonyms == |
== Pitch and noise are not antonyms == |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
![]() |
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
The lede contains this sentence: "Pitch can be determined only in sounds that have a frequency that is clear and stable enough to distinguish from noise." Perhaps this is quoted from the referenced source, but "noise" is a problematic term: music often incorporates unpitched percussion, for example, which isn't really noise. The page noise defines it as unwanted sounds, like weeds in a garden, which is a value judgment more than a perceptual phenomenon. —Wahoofive (talk) 23:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was hoping to find out when it became possible to associate a frequency with a pitch. The idea that sound is vibrations of air has been around for a very long time, but when did it become possible to associate an actual number of cycles per second to a pitch? BruceThomson (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
pitch is a perpetual property of sound That allows their ording on an a frequency-related scale 102.89.34.202 (talk) 18:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than pitch being a synonym to frequency, it is instead a perceptual phenomenon? And each "pitch" (i.e. each perception of a sound) has an assosciated frequency? I am so vastly confused. How am I supposed to understand pitch if it's not objective? Qsimanelix (talk) 19:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]