| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Semantic HTML article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for merging with HTML5 on August 2014. The result of the discussion was not merge. |
This is a talk page. Please respect the talk page guidelines, and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (112.215.36.144 (talk) 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)).[reply]
The article doesn’t explain where semantics/meaning come from (agreement, essentially) and what different levels of agreement there are (standards, microformats, classes/IDs, &c.). Many conclusions of the article are consequentially false. Problems begin with the introductory statement that semantic HTML “reinforces semantics”; semantic HTML doesn’t reinforce semantics unless this is meant to say that oranges reinforce their being orange. Rich Snippets are probably a very, possibly too specific example, while RDF/Semantic Web could be good to elaborate on in the HTML realm. I don’t mean to bash here for there are some useful parts in the article, but overall I suggest a rewrite. (I’m merely suggesting, then, to rule out bias; I myself have explained semantics on my own site and at Google.—j9t (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Semantic HTML. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
