|
|
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== This page is essentially marketing and advertising material and should be deleted == |
== This page is essentially marketing and advertising material and should be deleted == |
||
If one removes the sources referring to non-peer-reviewed publications |
If one removes the sources referring to non-peer-reviewed publications, sale documents, press releases and documents authored by a party with financial interest in this company (i.e. publications with significant bias), this page is essentially unsourced and thus should be deleted. |
||
Amarra and similar products from this company have been widely criticized for making claims that are contradicted by peer-reviewed research and publications that rely on universally accepted scientific principles. This company has never offered support for its product claims that meets the standards of publication of peer-reviewed research. This company is infamous for making claims via comparisons that are subject to significant expectation bias and are thus scientifically invalid. This company has never offered peer-reviewed double blind ABX test results to substantiate any of its claims. Several freeware applications (e.g. foobar2000) and less costly applications (JRiver) have been shown through scientifically valid tests to be superior. |
Amarra and similar products from this company have been widely criticized for making claims that are contradicted by peer-reviewed research and publications that rely on universally accepted scientific principles. This company has never offered support for its product claims that meets the standards of publication of peer-reviewed research. This company is infamous for making claims via comparisons that are subject to significant expectation bias and are thus scientifically invalid. This company has never offered peer-reviewed double blind ABX test results to substantiate any of its claims. Several freeware applications (e.g. foobar2000) and less costly applications (JRiver) have been shown through scientifically valid tests to be superior. |
If one removes the sources referring to non-peer-reviewed publications, sale documents, press releases and documents authored by a party with financial interest in this company (i.e. publications with significant bias), this page is essentially unsourced and thus should be deleted.
Amarra and similar products from this company have been widely criticized for making claims that are contradicted by peer-reviewed research and publications that rely on universally accepted scientific principles. This company has never offered support for its product claims that meets the standards of publication of peer-reviewed research. This company is infamous for making claims via comparisons that are subject to significant expectation bias and are thus scientifically invalid. This company has never offered peer-reviewed double blind ABX test results to substantiate any of its claims. Several freeware applications (e.g. foobar2000) and less costly applications (JRiver) have been shown through scientifically valid tests to be superior.