The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
This page was proposed for deletionbyNagle (talk · contribs) on 8 August 2015 with the comment: Topic already covered at Business incubator. It was secondedbyBrianhe (talk · contribs) on 9 August 2015 It was contestedbyMangehrn (talk · contribs) on 9 August 2015 |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with Business incubator on 9 August 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Based on the recently contested PROD, I propose that Startup studio be merged into Business incubator. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 20:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC) [edited 20:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)][reply]
I disagree. The term Startup Studio is a stand alone definition, with over 100 companies worldwide that call themselves a Startup Studio. See http://buildtogether.co/ and https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ROZs3GFZ4bHmeUC2qXk2piDCEdM0oaqJIoY1hDofw-w/edit?pli=1#gid=1241327342 to learn more. I am the co-founder of a startup studio myself www.wide-ventures.com. We are not a Business incubator as you propose User:Mangehrn —Preceding undated comment added 10:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi guys. Sorry for nearly causing an edit war. But i still stand to my point, that the startup studio is a stand alone topic. Mangehrn (talk) 21:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC) The main difference is, that within a studio products are built. So startups aren't just receiving coaching and space. And alot of times, the studio develops their own ideas. It's not incubation. Its building or actually producing. Kind of like in a record studio.Mangehrn (talk) 21:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello there,
I'm Attila Szigeti, author of Startiup Studio Playbook - which is based on a global research of startup studios, venture builders, and includes case studies, best practices about how such organizations work.
Please consider adding this book and my other research called Startup Studio Trends 2015 to the sources as it contains more details on the subject that the current Startup Studio Wiki page.
For example I propose adding a short description and flow chart: " Startup studios build multiple startups in parallel with internal resources, so it represents a shift from individual startup building to mass-startup-production.
The common steps of a startup studio are:
"
More info on the book: http://www.startupstudioplaybook.com/
Also I created a global report on studios, called Startup Studio Trends 2015:
I propose adding a section about startup studio performance:
"
"
More on this: https://medium.com/@aszig/startup-studios-on-the-rise-34ec5ad8310d#.6q1qel4li https://gumroad.com/l/sssp1
Thank you,
Attila
attila@startupstudioplaybook.com
I'm removing the list of startup studios section for right now.
It was added and originally sourced to Medium, but it seems like it's inviting a lot of promotional edits. If you look at the edit history since it's been added, almost all of the edits to the article are people adding an unsourced studio to the list.
If someone wants to make a list of blue-linked startup studios (aka, only notable ones that have their own article), I think that would be okay to add. But otherwise I think the list becomes too open-ended, making it more of a directory than an encyclopedic section. - Whisperjanes (talk) 18:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]