There is a beautiful picture of a classic 60's protester flying the bird right in the face of the camera. I believe this was a cover of Time or Life in the late 60's. IMHO this picture is an aboslute must for viewing in the "classic examples" section of this topic. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find the picture. If someone can do so, I would be most grateful as would all knowledge seekers looking for enlightenment on how to fly the bird.
someone who knows the story should add to this article the origins of "the finger". I know it has to do with archery exploits during wars between the french and the english, but I don't know specifics.
Also, IMHO, this article should be named "the finger" - Kingturtle 21:54 Apr 7, 2003 (UTC)
That's my finger. No really. Ich 04:26, Jun 20, 2004 (UTC)
see mammalian prehensile digits... right ^_^... [maestro] 10:29, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I've always heard the origin of the finger coming from a battle in The Hundred-Years' War where the French had won a battle and were putting up their fingers a la "We're #1!", and the British mistakenly took the symbol as offensive because of its similarity to genitalia...can anyone confirm this?64.24.4.167 16:24, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I've never heard anyone suggest that "the finger" comes from English archers. Two-fingers, yes, that's common knowledge in the UK, but not one. And the "pluck yew" thing is patently ridiculous and shouldn't be on the page. [217.42.38.179]
I agree, this is adding confusion to confusion. The 'two fingers' origin may itself be apocryphal, but it makes slightly more sense than this, which I can only attribute to second-order mythologising. (Besides, if you cut off someone's middle finger they could still draw a bow...) I'm going to edit this, unless someone can provide references for the "popularity" of this story. Alai 23:00, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The photo could be of better quality. Also what about the variation of the finger in which the thumb is also extended out to the side? I heard that way of giving the finger is supposed to be more dramatic. Just a few thoughts. --Sudachi 11:09, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I'd like to see some sort of supporting evidence for the term "Trudeau salute". I'm sure it does exist but I find it hard to believe that it is commonly used.
Here the link to "Finger" by Mike Wirth http://www.mikewirthart.com/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=23
does anyone remember this? i saw it once on a TV bloopers show. toward the end of an NFL game, the camera gives a close up of a dejected fan, his team losing by a lot of points, he looks into the camera and gives the finger. since it was live TV, it went onto the airwaves. when they showed the blooper later, the finger was blurred out. does anyone remember this? if we can get details about it, i'd like to add it to this article. Kingturtle 18:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Where does the term flipping the bird come from? Anyone know?
Erm:
I don't know what part of Canada the writer was talking about -- things might well be different in Quebec, for instance -- but giving someone the finger in Ontario is probably as rude as it is anywhere in the States. --Saforrest 07:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah i totally agree i live in a good part of toronto and i almost got my ass kicked because some dude thought i gave him the finger, when i actually didn't. Even in Quebec where i used to live the middle finger is considered pretty offensive to give to someone. i don't know anyone who would tolerate being given the finger in most of canada. --Duhon July 24 2006 (UTC)
Where i live you can still get beaten up for biting your thumb at someone.
I think that wikipedia should be careful about generalizations. In Sweden, giving someone a finger is usually not nearly as offensive as in some other countries. It is most often just seen as an inmature act, since a large proportion of "bird flippers" in Sweden are in their preteens (yes, citation is needed for that). Ran4 (talk) 06:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the "famous example" of George Bush giving the finger, it mentions a video which emerged in 2005 of the then Governer of Texas. It needs to be clarified, whether the video is from when he was governor and only subsequently emerged in 2005, or whether it emerged in 2005 at all, or whatever - it just needs to be clarified. it also needs to be clarified for me at least whether this is a hoax or not - the still isn't so convincing. I'd appreciate if someone who knows what went on, to give this a look. Cormaggio @ 17:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's no hoax. This is a screenshot from when he was running for governor and they were all joking around in the studio before taping. It is dangerous to take things like this out of context.Steven 17:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed this claim:
There's simply no way I would have missed as juicy a bit of news as this, given how broadly the whole MacKay/Stronach romantic arc was played out in the press, and Google can't find a trace. It didn't happen, at least not in public. --Saforrest 03:47, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have heard the V Sign explained as 'dual penetration' but I don't know if there's any evidence of this.--Jack Upland 07:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the "V sign" was the one with it's origins after the battle of Agincourt. Maybe the story has just gotten twisted so many times over the centuries, but I heard it that the French cut off both the middle and index fingers of the archers. It's still quite possible to draw a bow with your index and ring finger, and practice would make up for the weakness of the ring finger. --122.104.226.191 (talk) 06:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No offence, but the picture looks really atrocious. Can someone take a better one please? See gesture for better examples. Also it would be nice to have a pic of some celebrity, for example this. PizzaMargherita 05:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Consider this done. I have uploaded a professionally photographed picture of myself giving the one finger salute. This picture is under the GPL/Commons license. --Allyn 09:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very surprised that we don't have lots of pictures of this, but I can't find any better than the blurry one currently in the article. Can someone take some nice clear pictures of just the hand, one for each different variation? — Omegatron 00:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this picture is excellent in its depiction of the gesture at hand and does an excellent job of conveying its meaning in a contemporary context. Wikipedia, you've done it again!? 69.209.208.221 17:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, I see in the subjects face all the emotion that is generally conveyed with the meaning of the gesture. This is perfect for anyone wanting to understand it's significance. --67.102.158.43 14:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I get this occasionally:
Subject: History of the Middle Finger > We never stop learning.... For all you history lovers and speech > pathologists! > > Subject: " History of middle finger" > > Well, now......here's something I never knew before, and now > that I know it, I feel compelled to send it on to my more intelligent > friends in the hope that they, too, will feel edified. Isn't history more > fun when you know something about it? > > Before the Battle of Agincourt in 1415, the French, anticipating > victory over the English, proposed to cut off the middle finger of all > captured English soldiers. Without the middle finger it would be > impossible to draw the renowned English longbow and therefore they > would be incapable of fighting in the future. This famous English > longbow was made of the native English Yew tree, and the act of > drawing the longbow was known as"plucking the yew" (or "pluck yew"). > > Much to the bewilderment of the French, the English won a major > upset and began mocking the French by waving their middle fingers at > the defeated French, saying, ''See, we can still pluck yew! '' Since > 'pluck yew' is rather difficult to say, the difficult consonant cluster at > the > beginning has gradually changed to a labiodentals fricative 'F', and > thus the words often used in conjunction with the one-finger-salute! > > It is also because of the pheasant feathers on the arrows used > with the longbow that the symbolic gesture is known as "giving the > bird." > > IT IS STILL AN APPROPRIATE SALUTE TO THE FRENCH TODAY! > > And yew thought yew knew every plucking thing!
The article mentions it briefly, but it should address all of it. DyslexicEditor 01:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is there another article somewhere that describes the related gesture where the arm giving the finger is passed underneath the other fore-arm, making a cross shape? I don't even know what that's called, but it's clearly related to "The Finger", as the two gestures are most often combined into one. (Though not always - this gesture, with the finger replaced by a little hand-wave, was used with comedic effect as a respectful salute in the movie "Spaceballs".) --Lurlock 21:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"In some subcultures in the United States, it is known as the 'one fingered victory salute' which gained popularity after this video appeared on the Internet in October 2004, showing George W. Bush, at the time of the film the Governor of Texas, using the gesture while goofing off before beginning filming of a public address."
"A popular MTV show, Pimp My Ride featured rapper Xzibit taking a car with a pair of Mickey Mouse gloves with four fingers including the thumb. As Xzibit drives the car, he wears the gloves and flips off the camera. Despite the technicality, it is still censored."
Despite what technicality ???
He's wearing a glove while giving the finger; he's literally "giving the finger" but technically you can't see it because of the glove being worn over the hand. Whether or not that's the same thing is debatable, but regardless that's the "technicality" referred to by the original author. 71.201.59.110 08:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neither I (nor anybody I know) thinks the finger is a phallic symbol. "The reference to coitus may be strengthened by first wetting the finger or by sucking on it." I have never heard of anyone doing that either. Who in the hells thinks of or does the gesture that way? --TheTruthiness 06:44, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've never seen or heard of this either.--67.102.158.43 18:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That the finger is a phallic symbol is pretty much common knowledge, especially given the thought which it generally symbolizes ("Fuck you" is a decidedly phallic phrase, if we're going to consider the active/passive roles typically associated in coitus that would historically assign meaning). I've never seen anyone wet the finger or suck on it, but the middle finger is the closest thing to a universal insulting gesture the world has so I wouldn't be surprised if those are common regional variations. --The Centipede 17:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To quote the Wikipedia entry on phallus, "Any object that visually resembles a penis or acts as a symbol for it may also be referred to as a phallus; however, such objects are more correctly referred to as being phallic." In other words, "the finger" is a "phallic symbol" simply because it resembles a penis (and the erection of the finger of course results in an image resembling an erect penis.) It doesn't matter who thinks the gesture is not a phallic symbol; it just is one. 71.201.59.110 09:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen people do it, and it has a certain flair.HichamVanborm 02:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also thought that that was it's one and only meaning, literally, 'fuck you,' or 'please be forcibly sodimised,' with the middle finger being a graphical representation of the instrument with which the act is executed. Should the article not at least mention this?
Since The Finger redirects to tris page, I've added a redirect to the punk rock band. There is definitely no need for a disambiguation page in this case. --Cyhatch 11:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why is someone continually replacing Image:Middle finger.JPG? Not only is the image in public domain, it's also more focused on the finger than Image:Male_right_middle_crop.jpg is--TBCTaLk?!? 16:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.246.111 (talk) 07:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Similarly insulting gestures in Germany include making a circle by touching the index finger to the thumb (perceived in America as the "OK" sign) to call someone asshole; [...]
Being an Austrian myself that has worked and lived in Germany, I never heard of this one. Can anybody cite a source for such a usage? Dagonet 17:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Being a German, I must say that I have never heard of anybody finding this gesture offensive. I use it myself a lot (to signal "perfect" or "ok") and have never gotten into any trouble, nor did anybody even find it offensive. --88.64.13.160 17:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Concerning the circle created by touching the index finger to the thumb as an obscene gesture in Germany: It maybe that observers of this gesture were seeing American soldiers,in civilian dress, playing a game called the "asshole game". It uses the same gesture with the exception that the gesture, unlike the standard OK sign, is presented upside down with the hand below the waist. The object of the game is to con another person into looking at the gesture and if they do, they must pay a forfeit which is to be forcefully hit on the upper arm. This game has subtle strategies, is very competitive, can be played anywhere at anytime and is very popular with young soldiers. I have often played this game when I was a young soldier. oldasasoldier
Actually this gesture is very common when driving a car and wanting to insult another person because of his/her driving style. In other contexts it also can be meant as "perfect", often combined with the corresponding mimic, or even a kissing sound. But if someone shows you this gesture on a German Autobahn (Highway), he surely doesn't admire your style of driving xD 84.62.26.151 (talk) 23:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All of the following is actually about the V sign and not about the middle finger. Also, there is no source presented either for the myth or for its rebuttal (snopes.com can hardly count as a reliable source about anything, and much of the text seems like the editor's personal statements anyway). Furthermore, this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, so using rhetorical questions etc. is totally inappropriate. --194.145.161.227 13:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It has long been told that the famous "two-fingers salute" and/or "V sign" derives from the gestures of English archers, fighting at Agincourt. The myth claims that the French cut off two fingers on the right hand of captured archers and that the gesture was a sign of defiance by those who were not mutilated. Knights of the time were extremely difficult to challenge in open engagement due to the amount of armor they wore, and the enormity of the horses they rode. One problem the knights faced however, was the English longbow. From a garrison or fortification, longbowmen would string their arrows in quick recession and aim for the armors weak spots. This resulted in many casualties for the knights. If the knights did however capture the fortification, they would either kill the longbowmen, or chop off their middle finger (necessary for stringing arrows effectively). As for the bowmen that escaped, upon seeing a knight, they would hold up their middle finger in mockery of the knight as if to say "ha, ha, you didn't get me"[citation needed].
Unfortunately, this is by no means the way that it happened at the time. Bowman were not valuable prisoners; they stood outside the chivalric system and were considered the social inferiors of men-at-arms. There was no monetary reward to be obtained by capturing them, nor was there any glory to be won by defeating them in battle. As Keegan wrote, "To meet a similarly equipped opponent was the occasion for which the armoured soldier trained perhaps every day of his life from the onset of manhood. To meet and beat him was a triumph, the highest form which self-expression could take in the medieval nobleman's way of life." Archers were not the "similarly equipped" opponents that armored soldiers triumphed in defeating; if the two clashed in combat, the armored soldier would either kill an archer outright or leave him to bleed to death rather than go to the wasteful effort of taking him prisoner.
Moreover, if archers could be ransomed, then cutting off their middle fingers would be a senseless move. Your opponent is not going to pay you (or pay you much) for the return of mutilated soldiers, so now what do you do with them? Take on the burden and expense of caring for them? Kill them outright and violate the medieval moral code of civilized warfare? (Henry V was heavily criticized for supposedly having ordered the execution of French prisoners at Agincourt.)
Even if killing prisoners of war did not violate the moral code of the times, what would be the purpose of cutting off fingers and then executing these same people? Why not simply kill them outright in the first place? Do you return these prisoners to your opponents in exchange for nothing, thereby providing them with trained soldiers who can fight against you another day? (Even if archers whose middle fingers had been amputated could no longer effectively use their bows, they were still capable of wielding mallets, battleaxes, swords, lances, daggers, maces, and other weapons, as archers typically did — and as they indeed did at Agincourt — when the opponents closed ranks with them and the fighting became hand-to-hand.)
http://snopes.com/language/apocryph/pluckyew.htm]
Jean Froissart (circa 1337-circa 1404) was a historian and the author of Froissart's Chronicles, a document that is essential to an understanding of Europe in the fourteenth century and to the twists and turns taken by the Hundred Years' War. The story of the English waving their fingers at the French is told in the first person account by Jean Froissart. However, the description is not of an incident at the Battle of Agincourt, but rather at the siege of a castle nearby in the Hundred Years' War. Adding to the evidence is that by all accounts Jean Froissart died before the battle actually took place; it was therefore rather difficult for him to have written about it.
One should note that Jean Froissart's writings aren't the most reliable and that a similar story is told about the English giving the V sign. This can be further explored at the Battle of Agincourt.
I've just added a better pic. Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia
|wanna Talk? 04:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The photo depicting President Bush giving the finger gets periodically deleted and re-added. Interesting as the concept of a now-you-see-it-now-you-don't illustration is, it would be nice to reach some very rough consensus on this. My opinion is that it is just a photo of a real, and well-known, person doing the gesture spontaneously, and not staging it to create an image for the article. Opinions? (And, I am not sure that removing the picture qualifies as a "minor edit", as in something that "could never be the subject of a dispute", per Help:Minor_edit...) Goochelaar 08:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, in accordance with WP policy I removed spam (WP:SPAM), and for the reasons given in this statement, the action qualifies the deletion. In all due respect, posting a picture of the President of the United States of America, or any other major political figure depicting an improper gesture is considered inappropriate and vulgar to the general public. Another aspect of the issue at hand is that posting a picture depicting such action inherently condescends and belittles the educated Wikipedian observer. Besides these observations, we must remember that children are being subjected to an improper view of their President, and that is unacceptable to the majority of Americans – moreover, because Wikipedia is an educational tool, the picture depicting ‘the finger’ adds no value to the article (as mostly everyone knows what the article is already pointing to). Depicting vulgar photos on the encyclopedia could also potentially become a Public relations nightmare in the WP environment, discouraging quality articles from ever being created because Americans (that see this content) respect their country, and their President (regardless of denomination) who is a figure thereof. I am sure Jimmy Wales would agree with this statement. Therefore, under Wikipedia spam policy provisions, the photo qualified for deletion, and I deleted it. Best regards, --Lperez2029 14:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Then we're not gonna have any pic on this article, not even a drawing. -- Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia |wanna Talk? 03:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Call me thick, but I do not see how any President Bush's photo may qualify as spam. He is not selling anything, is he? As for children or Americans being shocked, this is a reference work, and is bound to contain material (graphic or otherwise) that might be found unpleasant by somebody (anatomical details, disturbing news...). Finally, I am not an American, but if a President of my country (Italy) were caught doing a less-than-polite gesture, I wouldn't worry too much. He is responsible for his actions. But wait... It has already occurred! The article corna is: a) complete with a generic depiction of that vulgar gesture; b) endowed with an image of Italian former President Giovanni Leone making the corna. I find it an interesting photo documenting the gesture. Best regards to you, Goochelaar 08:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
|wanna Talk? 04:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]I don't think I've ever read anything more wrong on Wikipedia than what Lperez2029 said. I sit in shock and awe of the complete lack of knowledge in regards to not only Wikipedia, but life in general. One of the main rules is that Wikipedia is UNCENSORED- so don't give this "it's for the children" line of bullshit. The President is not a sacred cow, it doesn't matter if it's President Bush, Johnny Cash or Bob from across the street- it's a perfectly valid picture. It is in no way spam by any sane person, the only reason to remove it is because the image does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. But the most ridiculous line was "the picture depicting ‘the finger’ adds no value to the article (as mostly everyone knows what the article is already pointing to)". I don't think I can begin to describe the idiocy contained in there. Maybe the WWII article shouldn't have any pictures because mostly everyone knows what the article is already pointing to? Maybe no articles should exist at all?? The article exists because we don't assume mostly everyone knows what the article is already pointing to, we have a picture because it clearly ILLUSTRATES the hand gesture we're talking about. Dear God, I can barely read Lperez2029's comment without laughing hysterically. I've put the old image:Male_right_middle_crop.jpg back as per the earlier discussion about it. --TheTruthiness 04:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that Wikipedia is not censored, Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive. But we are talking about Spam (because the picture ‘politicizes’ the hand gesture) not censorship. You are from Canada I see. --Lperez2029 12:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Exactly. There is no need to link the hand gesture to any political figure because that would qualify it as spam. On another note, unlike TheTruthiness I appreciate your civility, for it is the true spirit of a Wikipedian. Like you, I am of Italian descent myself and clearly see the intellectual advantage and ability to reason things out without resorting to rudeness and personal attacks. If I were a Canadian, I would putTheTruthinessin his place because he would bring shame to the people of my country -- but I am not going to waste my time. Some people prefer to be Impolite, Inconsiderate, Offensive, Obscene, and I believe all these things together with incivility eventually belong in Wiki-Hell [3]. Everything under the sun has its place. For (spam free) reference information, that's in an encyclopedia. For other things, it's in a thesaurus or a dictionary. Never should these be mixed. Best --Lperez2029 17:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 17:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[At this point in the discussion a remark by a user was deleted by another user (see history for details). The deleted remark was harshly critical and could even be construed as a personal attack toward a third user, but are we sure that it is right to delete it? I strongly disagree, but did not revert the reversion, not intending to start even an edit skirmish. Goochelaar 11:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)][reply]
Does giving the finger mean anything in non-Western cultures? I'm sure it's probably known about, but the article never goes into details. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.193.151.207 (talk) 07:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Can we get a better picture for the start of the article? What does everybody else think? Maybe Pete Doherty giving the finger? There's bound to be a ton of those around. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ISeeDeadPixels (talk • contribs) 21:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
the whole discourse on politicians and the finger is entirely boring - it would be much more interesting to describe what the roman and greek origins of the finger are in a little more detail and maybe discuss other places it has been used in history (non-political stuff)... most of us really don't care what politician is using the finger when we're looking up the history of it, we're interested in how it became part of modern culture. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.127.235.162 (talk) 01:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
I've added a new image of the middle finger. Any thoughts on it?--TBCΦtalk? 01:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The finger looks unnaturally too small compared to the hand, but it's much better than most horrors this page has seen. 83.67.217.254 21:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, too dark and not very insistent/threatening. I don't sense any hostility. --CliffC 11:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, lighting is not great, plus the computer-aided trimming adds to the unnatural feel. A white wall like in finger would be fine. Thank you very much TBC. 83.67.217.254 13:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As per above, I'll take a better picture as soon as possible. Until then, I'm reverting it back.--TBCΦtalk? 21:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello:
In response to requests on this talk page, I attempted to add the following picture: Which I had taken by a professional, with better lighting, and then commons-licensed. Then someone took it off, saying that it did not contribute anything. I am not replacing it until I get comments here. Do you want a better image? --Allyn 12:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are many things I don't like about this picture:
Good luck to the "professional" who took the picture. We really need a good finger-only picture. 83.67.217.254 20:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have a point. I will suggest to the photog to use a remote flash with a diffuser and adjust the lighting. Thank you for the feedback.
Someone substituted billions of years for thousands of years. I put it back to thousands of years. --Allyn 02:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm posting a new picture that I hope everyone will find suitably offensive. I was feeling hostile when it was taken, and I think the hostility comes through nicely. It is also anonymous (shows the hand only), so any passing vandals will find less to comment on. Best wishes to all the other odd types that watch this article. --CliffC 00:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the image as it's too offensive for this wedsite
...was just added by User:Emijrp. A lovely show of sullen hostility. This is a picture we should stick with for a while. CliffC 18:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The picture should just be of the gesture. No need for the face to be in it. I tried to crop it, but it was reverted twice by a user from another language Wiki... for a reason unknown to me. Does anyone else agree that it should show the gesture only, as this image is POV, suggesting that it's given for sullen reasons (which is rare), as opposed to being very angry or in another different situation? Opinions? hmwithtalk 05:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
two fingers, with the palm facing the person performing the gesture? it's very well known in the UK. no mention of it here. and no article of it's own. why?
I believe the convention is that the two finger sign with palm facing the person is the victory sign http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_sign , whereas if the palm faces the person making the gesture it is the obscene gesture. That's how it used to be anyway, although it may have become more muddled in recent years.
I've heard the terms "flipping someone off" and "flicking someone off" so does anyone know which one is correct? 68.54.174.43 17:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Flip the bird, flick the V's was always my understanding - but then I'm a Brit so it's probably different wherever you are. After all, if you can't rely on people getting lose/loose correct on mainstream news media - getting 'flick/flip' right isn't going to happen.--Koncorde 00:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I dont think anyone uses the phrase "the Bird" in the UK. I dont think anyone would know what that phrase meant. It is more common here just to say that someone "stuck their finger up" etc
added mad magazine refrence, might put up picture of it tommorow Wikimindless 04:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is the reference to the whole 'pluck yew' thing verified? I don't think it's true. It shows up in a lot of spam emails, as stated before. It's introduced in the beginning of the article, but worded more 'scholarly.'
Will someone verify this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.95.245 (talk) 23:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? I can't find a reference for this term. Seems pretty obscure. It's not even in the urban dictionary. I'm considering removing. -Verdatum (talk) 03:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I thought there was tremendous humor value in having the finger face the viewer of the photo. Seeing the giver's view is nothing special, I can see that anytime. In fact, I'm looking at it right now, imagining you reading this. JimmycurN 08:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. There is a funny moment in the Fritz Lang's Die Nibelungen, where Alberich (dying) shows to Siegfried your middle finger as well you can see here.
It possible to be a accidentally action. But would be interesting if we serch about this and will be publish something in this article. What you think? Sorry my bad English. -- 201.22.206.20 (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"On February 2, 2007, Mirek Topolánek, prime minister of the Czech republic, gave the finger to left-wing deputies in the Czech parliament [10] and later explained the gesture to the media and the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic as a friendly gesture towards Miroslav Kalousek, one of his cabinet ministers. "
In Czech, isn't Mirek the short version of Miroslav? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.218.41.190 (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted the deletion of the picture. I will agree with some others that the picture isn't great, and I invite others to choose a more expressive one. But it's clear to me that (1) having a picture of the gesture helps the article; and (2) a solid majority of participants on these pages agree. Deletion of the picture without replacing it with a better one should therefore depend on achieving consensus for such an action.
The reason given for the deletion simply referred to the picture as being of an offensive gesture. Um... that's what the article is about. It is entirely appropriate to include a picture of a gesture in the article about it, regardless that that might offend somebody. atakdoug (talk) 11:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is this really a common term? I have only found one reference by Googling that doesn't seem to be a copy of the list given in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.16.236.30 (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That makes absolutely no sense. A thumb translates to the middle finger? I think it actually did come from the hundreds year war. English Longbow men (the scourge of the French) used their middle finger when firing an arrow. The French started going around to villages and cutting off the Longbow mens fingers. So after battles the English would hold up their middle finger showing the French that they still had their fingers. It is also called the English Sign of Defiance. Why is this not on the page, I am 99.9% sure that the aforementioned story is true. Superbowlbound (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking for a definition of "High sign" - a phrase I heard in a song - and got directed straight here. But apart from the redirect there is no mention of that phrase in the article. Can anyone elucidate? What sense of the word "high" is meant? (intoxicated / elevated / ?) Rachel Pearce (talk) 23:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why does an image of Drew Carey flipping the bird appear on this page? It adds nothing to this particular article, and there are already plenty of examples of people flipping the bird in this article already. Additionally, the existence of this picture is causing a minor havoc on Drew Carey's own article, as it is consistently replacing a good, non-offensive image on the page due to a user's continuing vandalism. I would recommend the picture removed from this page, and will nominate the image for deletion. --Mr. Brown (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User Trueslpatriot recently removed my comments regarding the index finger gesture in Sri Lanka saying that index finger gesture means "out" in cricket, and has no other meaning in Sri Lanka. As a Sri Lankan, I personally have used this gesture :) and can talk authoritativey about it. The arm with index finger is held lower, and back of the palm pointing outward (where as cricket umpires hold the the back of the plam inwards, usually). However, I will not add it again, till I have a good piture and a referance source. Ritigala Jayasena (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i think alot of stuff could be moved from the intro to "The Finger in different cultures" or something. 88.73.221.210 (talk) 16:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC) aep[reply]
(hey, I know this is not about the article realy, so if I'm breaking a rule and the post is deleted, it's OK.) I'm looking for a picture in black and white of The Kid (performed by Jackie Coogan in Charles Chaplin's film) extending his middle finger. My uncle had a portrait of it in his bedroom when he was younger, but lost it, and I want it in order to print it. Please, if you've got it, let me know how to get it, posting in my talk or here. Thanks, --Andresf91 (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it deserves to be mentioned in the article. sendmoreinfo (talk) 21:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
