Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Unfair advantage to Vodafone  
1 comment  




2 Fair use rationale for Image:Vodafone Logo.jpg  
1 comment  




3 Info doesnt fit  





4 Image copyright problem with Image:Cheeka1.jpg  





5 Zoozoos  














Talk:Vodafone India: Difference between revisions




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
→‎Zoozoos: new section
Madan lmg (talk | contribs)
295 edits
Line 43: Line 43:

I suggest ZooZoos be split into another article/.

I suggest ZooZoos be split into another article/.

--[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 15:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

--[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 15:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


It should be removed. it sounds like a campaign for vodafone on wikipedia which violates its principles. [[User:Madan lmg|Madan]] | [[User talk:Madan lmg|Talk]] 13:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


Revision as of 13:53, 9 June 2009

WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WHO IS FOUNDER OF HUTCH IN INDIA??

Unfair advantage to Vodafone

When users look for Hutch on wikipedia, they expect a neutral point of view. Its really unfair on the part of wikipedia to divert all articles on hutch to vodafone Essar. We can alwaya have an article on Hutch, with its logo and details and then a note that it has been acquired by vodafone. Hutch will always remain Hutch to its people, no matter what. So please wikipedia, have an oroginal and true article on Hutch. It'll boost your credibility too, wikipedia !

122.167.62.170 13:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vodafone Logo.jpg

Image:Vodafone Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info doesnt fit

A popular daily quoted a Vodafone Essar director as saying that "the objective is to leverage Vodafone Group's global scale in bringing millions of low-cost handsets from across-the-world into India."

While there is no revealing the prices of the low-cost Vodafone handsets, the industry is abuzz that prices might start at Rs 666, undercutting Reliance Communications' much-hyped 'Rang Barse' with cheap handsets beginning at Rs 777. Meanwhile, Vodafone Essar sources said there would be no discounts or subsidized handset offers -- rather handset-bundled

Image copyright problem with Image:Cheeka1.jpg

The image Image:Cheeka1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Zoozoos

I suggest ZooZoos be split into another article/. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

It should be removed. it sounds like a campaign for vodafone on wikipedia which violates its principles. Madan | Talk 13:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vodafone_India&oldid=295371789"

Categories: 
Unassessed India articles
Unknown-importance India articles
Unassessed-Class India articles of Unknown-importance
WikiProject India articles
Hidden category: 
Articles with WikiProject banners but without a banner shell
 



This page was last edited on 9 June 2009, at 13:53 (UTC).

This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki