curprev23:0623:06, 5 September 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,715 bytes+12 this image has such visual properties that its details, which are important for establishing a connection to the topic, become hard to see unless it's made a little larger than the default; there was some discussion of resizing the image on talkundo
curprev17:2017:20, 5 September 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,553 bytes−14 not a single mention of witch or witchcraft in Folklore /and only one mention, not of Folklore in general but of Japanese folklore, in Witchcraft/ -- the reader will expect to see something about witches in folklore, folkloric spells, or similar, and will be disappointed to see that there is no such contentundo
curprev14:1114:11, 5 September 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,580 bytes+26 Saying that forms of withcraft are neopagan witchcraft and feminist witchcraft tells the reader that witchcraft is something that comes in those two forms, and that is misleading. There were continents missing but they are not missing now, and that's how it should be. You reverted my change from weeks ago /Special:Diff/1171388671/ and the template has seen edits from multiple editors which means that there is an implicit consensus; you should form a new consensus. Not delegitimizing.undo
curprev12:3312:33, 5 September 2023 Darker Dreamstalkcontribs 2,554 bytes−16 Saying forms included in this list are "non-traditional" is exactly the same delegitimization as "novel" or "modern." Navbox lists are not assumed to be all-inclusive. The "region" header was acceptable without listing every possible area or continent. A navbox list of "forms" or "types" can include only those which have articles.undoTag: Manual revert
curprev06:5406:54, 5 September 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,570 bytes+16 I'll explain it to you on the talk page. I disagree with your revert of "novel forms" back to "types", and "forms" is equivalentundoTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev04:0804:08, 5 September 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,562 bytes+8 Undid revision 1173900488 by Darker Dreams (talk) it can't be types, not logical. I oppose "types" because it's untrue that witchcraft is a thing that comes in these two typesundoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev02:5102:51, 22 August 2023 SWinxytalkcontribs 2,719 bytes−32 Undid revision 1171590047 by Scyrme (talk) sure, the class can stay, but pictures should not be using the |link= parameter (it should link to the image details). The sidebar already has a clear link to Witchcraft.undo
curprev02:0602:06, 22 August 2023 Scyrmetalkcontribs 2,751 bytes+51 Undid revision 1171585474 by SWinxy (talk) | why not? other sidebars do so and it's useful; setting "notpageimage" ensures that articles don't end up with generic identical preview images just because the sidebar is at the top, and linking the image to the main article allows the image to help with navigationundoTag: Undo
curprev20:5220:52, 20 August 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,681 bytes−149 documentation and invisible text says: This is a top-of-page / side box and should be kept as minimal as possible; coven and solitary practitioner are about Neopagan witchcraft (coven article: The word "coven" [was] largely unused in English until 1921 when [MM] promoted the idea that all witches across Europe met in groups of thirteen which they called "covens) -- so these links don't belong; movements are weakly relatedundo
curprev20:4620:46, 20 August 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,830 bytes+17 saying "types" and then listing Neopagan witchcraft, feminist witchcraft and roma witchcraft as types means that witchcraft is something that comes in three types: Neopagan, feminist, and roma witchcraft; that's clearly silly, but it's certainly how a reader who is unfamiliar with the topic would understand it; add Wiccaundo
curprev16:1716:17, 20 August 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,813 bytes+1 image is too small, a sidebar image is not an "icon" or a visual identifier, it's a legitimate image for the sake of illustration, that may serve as a lead image in multiple articles that include the sidebarundo
curprev16:0516:05, 20 August 2023 Alalch E.talkcontribs 2,850 bytes−26 Magic (supernatural) contains the h2 section Witchcraft which is a summary of Witchcraft and has a main template to this article, so it's a higher-level article, and can't be presented like this in the sidebar, because it's redundant to the Witchcraft link and does not aid navigation; we want the readers to easily navigate to the Witchcraft article, not the summary thereof in another articleundo