→top: Add talk page header
|
→Stigmatizing labeling of media sites via template: new section
|
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
: {{bcc|Bacondrum}}{{added}}. It's been a couple of years, but I've just added [[Reclaim Australia]]. The other three were already in the template. — '''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 06:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC) |
: {{bcc|Bacondrum}}{{added}}. It's been a couple of years, but I've just added [[Reclaim Australia]]. The other three were already in the template. — '''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 06:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks! [[User:Bacondrum|Bacondrum]] ([[User talk:Bacondrum|talk]]) 23:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC) |
::Thanks! [[User:Bacondrum|Bacondrum]] ([[User talk:Bacondrum|talk]]) 23:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Stigmatizing labeling of media sites via template == |
|||
This template is now is being misused to label certain web sites with the stigmatizing term of "islamophobia". I believe this hurts the credibility of Wikipedia and use of the unclear term of "islamophobia" should not be promoted by Wikipedia itself. The word is mainly being used by certain groups to label opponents performing legitimate criticism of islam. Now certain users can add any website to this stigmatizing template without discussion. [[User:Newslinger]] readded [[Document.no]] to this template, a small Norwegian conservative website, and added [[Breitbart]] too for good measure, without discussion or citing credible sources. --[[User:Bjarkan|Bjarkan]] ([[User talk:Bjarkan|talk]]) 06:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC) |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Islamophobia template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Discrimination Template‑class | |||||||
|
Islam Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 19#Template:Islamophobia - result: no consensus.
So, I just want to ask again.
Australia has a noteworthy number of far right anti-islam hate groups, would it be reasonable to add some of them to the list? these four in particular:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reclaim_Australia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_Society_of_Australia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_Blue_Crew - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Patriots_Front
Any thoughts?@Meticulo:@Darouet:@Moxy:@Liftarn:@Benjamil:@BDD: Bacondrum (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This template is now is being misused to label certain web sites with the stigmatizing term of "islamophobia". I believe this hurts the credibility of Wikipedia and use of the unclear term of "islamophobia" should not be promoted by Wikipedia itself. The word is mainly being used by certain groups to label opponents performing legitimate criticism of islam. Now certain users can add any website to this stigmatizing template without discussion. User:Newslinger readded Document.no to this template, a small Norwegian conservative website, and added Breitbart too for good measure, without discussion or citing credible sources. --Bjarkan (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]