J u m p t o c o n t e n t
M a i n m e n u
M a i n m e n u
N a v i g a t i o n
● M a i n p a g e
● C o n t e n t s
● C u r r e n t e v e n t s
● R a n d o m a r t i c l e
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● C o n t a c t u s
● D o n a t e
C o n t r i b u t e
● H e l p
● L e a r n t o e d i t
● C o m m u n i t y p o r t a l
● R e c e n t c h a n g e s
● U p l o a d f i l e
S e a r c h
Search
A p p e a r a n c e
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P e r s o n a l t o o l s
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P a g e s f o r l o g g e d o u t e d i t o r s l e a r n m o r e
● C o n t r i b u t i o n s
● T a l k
( T o p )
1
S e e a l s o
T o g g l e t h e t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s
T h e W o r s h i p b o o k o f 1 9 7 0
A d d l a n g u a g e s
A d d l i n k s
● A r t i c l e
● T a l k
E n g l i s h
● R e a d
● E d i t
● V i e w h i s t o r y
T o o l s
T o o l s
A c t i o n s
● R e a d
● E d i t
● V i e w h i s t o r y
G e n e r a l
● W h a t l i n k s h e r e
● R e l a t e d c h a n g e s
● U p l o a d f i l e
● S p e c i a l p a g e s
● P e r m a n e n t l i n k
● P a g e i n f o r m a t i o n
● C i t e t h i s p a g e
● G e t s h o r t e n e d U R L
● D o w n l o a d Q R c o d e
● W i k i d a t a i t e m
P r i n t / e x p o r t
● D o w n l o a d a s P D F
● P r i n t a b l e v e r s i o n
P r i n t / e x p o r t
A p p e a r a n c e
F r o m W i k i p e d i a , t h e f r e e e n c y c l o p e d i a
T h i s i s a n o l d r e v i s i o n o f t h i s p a g e , a s e d i t e d b y R a n d y K r y n ( t a l k | c o n t r i b s ) at 1 1 : 0 9 , 2 5 O c t o b e r 2 0 1 5 . T h e p r e s e n t a d d r e s s ( U R L ) i s a p e r m a n e n t l i n k t o t h i s r e v i s i o n , w h i c h m a y d i f f e r s i g n i f i c a n t l y f r o m t h e c u r r e n t r e v i s i o n .
( d i f f ) ← P r e v i o u s r e v i s i o n | L a t e s t r e v i s i o n ( d i f f ) | N e w e r r e v i s i o n → ( d i f f )
The most significant feature is its brevity. The Worshipbook of 1970 is visibly thinner than the previous editions of the Book of Common Worship . The language is very contemporary, taking what was then a bold language in a liturgical book. There was less dependency on liturgical traditions, such as the Book of Common Prayer .
Since the book was so thin, it was published as both a singular volume and also bound with a new hymnal for the church.
See also
R e t r i e v e d f r o m " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Worshipbook_of_1970&oldid=687406079 "
C a t e g o r i e s :
● P r e s b y t e r i a n i s m i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s
● 1 9 7 0 b o o k s
● 1 9 7 0 i n r e l i g i o n
H i d d e n c a t e g o r i e s :
● A r t i c l e s l a c k i n g s o u r c e s f r o m J u n e 2 0 0 9
● A l l a r t i c l e s l a c k i n g s o u r c e s
● R e d i r e c t s c o n n e c t e d t o a W i k i d a t a i t e m
● T h i s p a g e w a s l a s t e d i t e d o n 2 5 O c t o b e r 2 0 1 5 , a t 1 1 : 0 9 ( U T C ) .
● T h i s v e r s i o n o f t h e p a g e h a s b e e n r e v i s e d . B e s i d e s n o r m a l e d i t i n g , t h e r e a s o n f o r r e v i s i o n m a y h a v e b e e n t h a t t h i s v e r s i o n c o n t a i n s f a c t u a l i n a c c u r a c i e s , v a n d a l i s m , o r m a t e r i a l n o t c o m p a t i b l e w i t h t h e C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n - S h a r e A l i k e L i c e n s e .
● P r i v a c y p o l i c y
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● D i s c l a i m e r s
● C o n t a c t W i k i p e d i a
● C o d e o f C o n d u c t
● D e v e l o p e r s
● S t a t i s t i c s
● C o o k i e s t a t e m e n t
● M o b i l e v i e w