mNo edit summary
|
Formatting, wiki links
|
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Plant processing tunnel rock.jpg|thumb|Processing plant at Amsteg in Switzerland. Processing tunnel rock from the Gotthard basis tunnel]] |
[[File:Plant processing tunnel rock.jpg|thumb|Processing plant at [[Amsteg]]in[[Switzerland]]. Processing tunnel rock from the Gotthard basis tunnel]] |
||
{{AFC submission|t||ts=20180115130414|u=Tberdal|ns=118|demo=}}<!-- Important, do not remove this line before article has been created. --> |
{{AFC submission|t||ts=20180115130414|u=Tberdal|ns=118|demo=}}<!-- Important, do not remove this line before article has been created. --> |
||
'''Tunnel rock recycling''' or utilization is a method to utilize the rock excavated from tunneling into other needed areas besides as a landfill. |
'''Tunnel rock recycling''' or utilization is a method to utilize the rock excavated from tunneling into other needed areas besides as a landfill. [[Concrete]] contains 50-80% aggregates from sand and gravel and could potentially benefit from using aggregates produced from excavated tunnel rock. |
||
Concrete contains 50-80 % aggregates from sand and gravel and could potentially benefit from using aggregates produced from excavated tunnel rock. |
|||
Today's road and railway tunnels are normally covered by concrete in the lining and portal. If the excavated rock was to be utilized as concrete aggregate it would be beneficial both economically and environmentally. It could be more value generating compared to using the excavated rock as landfill or filling up old [[quarries]]. Additionally, the need to transport could be significantly reduced as the utilization of the rock could be placed outside the tunnel portal with a processing facility and a concrete bathing plant. The investment cost of this facility would be repaid as the project could potentially be self-supplied on concrete.<ref>https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2454109</ref> |
|||
Todays road and railway tunnels are normally covered by concrete in the lining and portal. If the excavated rock was to be utilized as concrete |
|||
aggregate it would be beneficial both economically and environmentally. It would be more value |
|||
generating compared to use the excavated rock as landfill or filling up old quarries. Additionally, |
|||
would the need to transport be significantly reduced as the utilization of the rock could be |
|||
placed outside the tunnel portal with a processing facility and a concrete bathing plant. The investment |
|||
cost of this facility would be repaid as the project could potentially be self-supplied on concrete. |
|||
<ref>https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2454109</ref> |
|||
By 2018 |
By 2018, 7 tunnel projects will have accomplished utilizing tunnel rock into concrete on an industrial level, either as [[shotcrete]] or concrete elements in [[Tunnel boring machine|TBM tunneling]]: |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
! Project |
! Project |
||
Line 23: | Line 16: | ||
! Reference |
! Reference |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Zugwald |
| [[Zugwald]] |
||
| Switzerland |
| Switzerland |
||
| NA- 1998 |
| NA- 1998 |
||
Line 32: | Line 25: | ||
| <ref>Materialbewirtschaftung Zugwald-Tunnel 1987. 2001, Amberg Ingenieurbüro</ref> |
| <ref>Materialbewirtschaftung Zugwald-Tunnel 1987. 2001, Amberg Ingenieurbüro</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Gotthard |
| [[Gotthard Base Tunnel]] |
||
| Switzerland |
| Switzerland |
||
| 1999-2016 |
| 1999-2016 |
||
Line 42: | Line 35: | ||
Switzerland: Swiss tunneling society</ref> |
Switzerland: Swiss tunneling society</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Koralm KAT2 |
| [[Koralm KAT2]] |
||
| |
| Austria |
||
| 2013-2023 |
| 2013-2023 |
||
| 21 |
| 21 |
||
Line 52: | Line 45: | ||
Koralm tunnel lots KAT1 & KAT2. Austrian Federal Railways.</ref> |
Koralm tunnel lots KAT1 & KAT2. Austrian Federal Railways.</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Follo line |
| [[Follo line]] |
||
| Norway |
| Norway |
||
| 2016-2021 |
| 2016-2021 |
||
Line 61: | Line 54: | ||
| <ref>http://agjv.no/no/component/content/article?id=6:innovation.</ref>,<ref> https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/id/321874/Follobanen_st%C3%B8rst%20urban%20utfordrende%20raskere.pdf</ref> |
| <ref>http://agjv.no/no/component/content/article?id=6:innovation.</ref>,<ref> https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/id/321874/Follobanen_st%C3%B8rst%20urban%20utfordrende%20raskere.pdf</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Lötschberg |
| [[Lötschberg]] |
||
| Switzerland |
| Switzerland |
||
| 1999-2007 |
| 1999-2007 |
||
Line 71: | Line 64: | ||
conditions at the Lötschberg Base Tunnel. 2012.</ref> |
conditions at the Lötschberg Base Tunnel. 2012.</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Linthal |
| [[Linthal]] |
||
| Switzerland |
| Switzerland |
||
| 2010-2015 |
| 2010-2015 |
||
Line 81: | Line 74: | ||
plants and concrete dam constructions. 2014</ref> |
plants and concrete dam constructions. 2014</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| Nant de Drance |
| [[Nant de Drance]] |
||
| Switzerland |
| Switzerland |
||
| 2008-2016 |
| 2008-2016 |
This article, Tunnel rock recycling, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
Tunnel rock recycling or utilization is a method to utilize the rock excavated from tunneling into other needed areas besides as a landfill. Concrete contains 50-80% aggregates from sand and gravel and could potentially benefit from using aggregates produced from excavated tunnel rock.
Today's road and railway tunnels are normally covered by concrete in the lining and portal. If the excavated rock was to be utilized as concrete aggregate it would be beneficial both economically and environmentally. It could be more value generating compared to using the excavated rock as landfill or filling up old quarries. Additionally, the need to transport could be significantly reduced as the utilization of the rock could be placed outside the tunnel portal with a processing facility and a concrete bathing plant. The investment cost of this facility would be repaid as the project could potentially be self-supplied on concrete.[1]
By 2018, 7 tunnel projects will have accomplished utilizing tunnel rock into concrete on an industrial level, either as shotcrete or concrete elements in TBM tunneling:
Project | Country | Year | Km | Million tons(metric) | Utilization[%] | Diameter(mm) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zugwald | Switzerland | NA- 1998 | 9.5 | 1.2 | 16% | >16 | [2] |
Gotthard Base Tunnel | Switzerland | 1999-2016 | 57.1 | 28.7 | 23% | >0 | [3] |
Koralm KAT2 | Austria | 2013-2023 | 21 | 8.6 | 17% | >16 | [4] |
Follo line | Norway | 2016-2021 | 19.5 | 9 | 10%* | >20 | [5],[6] |
Lötschberg | Switzerland | 1999-2007 | 34.6 | 16 | 29.1% | >0 | [7] |
Linthal | Switzerland | 2010-2015 | 3.7 | 1 | 100% | >0 | [8] |
Nant de Drance | Switzerland | 2008-2016 | 5.5 | 1.14 | 25% | >0 | [9] |
This article, Tunnel rock recycling, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |