Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 References  














Umbrella review: Difference between revisions






العربية
Deutsch
Français
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
OAbot (talk | contribs)
425,242 edits
m Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.
the article is listed in the navbox per WP:NAV-WITHIN
Line 9: Line 9:

<ref name="Brown2020">{{Cite web| title = LibGuides: Scientific Literature Review Resources and Services: Systematic vs Literature reviews| author = Brown University Library| date = 1 September 2020| access-date = 25 September 2020| url = https://libguides.brown.edu/Reviews/types}}</ref>

<ref name="Brown2020">{{Cite web| title = LibGuides: Scientific Literature Review Resources and Services: Systematic vs Literature reviews| author = Brown University Library| date = 1 September 2020| access-date = 25 September 2020| url = https://libguides.brown.edu/Reviews/types}}</ref>

}}

}}


{{Evidence-based practice}}



[[Category:Systematic review]]

[[Category:Systematic review]]

Line 14: Line 16:

[[Category:Information science]]

[[Category:Information science]]

[[Category:Meta-analysis]]

[[Category:Meta-analysis]]




{{med-stub}}

{{med-stub}}


Revision as of 08:26, 10 June 2021

Inmedical research, an umbrella review is a review of systematic reviewsormeta-analyses.[1][2][3] They may also be called overviews of reviews, reviews of reviews, summaries of systematic reviews, or syntheses of reviews.[1] Umbrella reviews are among the highest levels of evidence currently available in medicine.[2]

By summarizing information from multiple overview articles, umbrella reviews make it easier to review the evidence and allow for comparison of results between each of the individual reviews.[1] Umbrella reviews may address a broader question than a typical review, such as discussing multiple different treatment comparisons instead of only one.[1][3] They are especially useful for developing guidelines and clinical practice, and when comparing competing interventions.[1][3]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Aromataris, Edoardo; Fernandez, Ritin; Godfrey, Christina M.; Holly, Cheryl; Khalil, Hanan; Tungpunkom, Patraporn (2015). "Summarizing systematic reviews". International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 13 (3): 132–140. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055. ISSN 1744-1609.
  • ^ a b Fusar-Poli, Paolo; Radua, Joaquim (2018). "Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews". Evidence Based Mental Health. 21 (3): 95–100. doi:10.1136/ebmental-2018-300014. ISSN 1362-0347.
  • ^ a b c Brown University Library (1 September 2020). "LibGuides: Scientific Literature Review Resources and Services: Systematic vs Literature reviews". Retrieved 25 September 2020.

  • t
  • e

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Umbrella_review&oldid=1027835326"

    Categories: 
    Systematic review
    Evidence-based practices
    Information science
    Meta-analysis
    Medicine stubs
    Hidden category: 
    All stub articles
     



    This page was last edited on 10 June 2021, at 08:26 (UTC).

    This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki