No edit summary
|
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* At times whether to respond back or not is quite catch-22. On one hand lectures being handed over to me being asked to be concise, to their long list now even funny charges being added, idk, intends to just mock me or mock the system. Now usual content deletions of my sourced contributions like at even [[Non-vegetarian]] are being cited as great examples of my bad personal record. I am confused Idk whether to laugh or cry. |
* At times whether to respond back or not is quite catch-22. On one hand lectures being handed over to me being asked to be concise, to their long list now even funny charges being added, idk, intends to just mock me or mock the system. Now usual content deletions of my sourced contributions like at even [[Non-vegetarian]] are being cited as great examples of my bad personal record. I am confused Idk whether to laugh or cry. |
||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Pakistan&type=revision&diff=1062283017&oldid=1062281437 Here] roughly 9 months before TB wrote to me ".. Love in Pakistan and Urdu Feminist Literature are fascinating (and valid) topics - if you need resources, give a ping. I will take up the article on forced conversion. .." But as soon as women's issues are covered at Public spaces their patriarchal structure and power on Wikipedia feels threatened. |
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Pakistan&type=revision&diff=1062283017&oldid=1062281437 Here] roughly 9 months before TB wrote to me ".. Love in Pakistan and Urdu Feminist Literature are fascinating (and valid) topics - if you need resources, give a ping. I will take up the article on forced conversion. .." But as soon as women's issues are covered at Public spaces their patriarchal structure and power on Wikipedia feels threatened. |
||
* Take google.com, books.google.com, scholar.google.com search for "Public spaces" "women" and various countries names including Pakistan, for many countries including Pakistan entire WP articles can be written and substantial part can be criticism, Let global women know why a sections dedicated to women issues in public spaces can not be there in [[Public spaces]] article and all women related issues are to be compulsively restricted to special for women articles. Why public spaces article can not be opened. Was there any restriction to begin with Pakistan and later adding others? Some one already covering those sources will naturally cover that. Show me existing article talk page RfC consensus against. Is that affecting male power structures on Wikipedia that I am being mansplained and dislodged. For that they bring me to ARE with repeating fake bad faith attacks of proven long duration sock accounts? |
|||
* One likes or not likes or not, as of this day [[Draft:1969 Rabindra Sarobar Stadium en masse sexual violence controversy|1969 Rabindra Sarobar Stadium en masse sexual violence controversy]] is first known on record non conflict time en masse sexual violence controversy with multiple reliable sources for notability. Idk why any one should be afraid that to be covered. |
* One likes or not likes or not, as of this day [[Draft:1969 Rabindra Sarobar Stadium en masse sexual violence controversy|1969 Rabindra Sarobar Stadium en masse sexual violence controversy]] is first known on record non conflict time en masse sexual violence controversy with multiple reliable sources for notability. Idk why any one should be afraid that to be covered. |
||
* Examples after examples ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-monumentalism&type=revision&diff=1082285333&oldid=1081331444 17]) like this one show my best possible editorial neutrality. With all humility I submit, if any one feels my content is not perfect then should have been discussed on article talk pages without resorting to personalization tactics. |
|||
* |
|||
* I would request discussion closing admin to let me know if they want any specific content related clarifications from me for the baseless pile of them submitted by <bdi>USaamo</bdi> AKG and TB. Any detail logical scrutiny will prove most of that to be just frivolous much of it making mountains out of molehills intending to smear and hound for their own POVs being hurt in some way. |
* I would request discussion closing admin to let me know if they want any specific content related clarifications from me for the baseless pile of them submitted by <bdi>USaamo</bdi> AKG and TB. Any detail logical scrutiny will prove most of that to be just frivolous much of it making mountains out of molehills intending to smear and hound for their own POVs being hurt in some way. |
||
** |
** |
Still to be properly updated