Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 

















User:Foreignshore/sandbox: Difference between revisions

















User page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
User contributions
User logs
View user groups
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< User:Foreignshore

Browse history interactively
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '{{User sandbox}} <!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> {{wikibreak|Foreignshore|on May 1}}'
 
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

{{User sandbox}}


<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->

I started editing (mostly copy editing) in 2008 but now I think it's time to retire. There are several reasons for this, issues I see that have bothered me about Wikipedia for some time. Honestly, it's no longer an enjoyable hobby for me.

{{wikibreak|[[User:Foreignshore|Foreignshore]]|on May 1}}


*"Wikipedia has no firm rules", says the [[WP:Five Pillars|fifth pillar]], yet there seems to be a small group of editors who will not hesitate to show you the firm rules and ensure that you conform to them. I am not bothered by having rules and enforcing them, but Wikipedia and its editors should be consistent in how they present themselves.

*[[WP:Civility]] is routinely ignored. I witnessed an editor tell another editor to "fuck off"; subsequently, the profanity-using editor was defended because "he is a long-term editor" and because "fuck off" is common English that one can use anytime one feels upset!

*The territorial attitude of many editors, posting on talk pages "Why did you make that edit?" (Read: "How dare you edit this article that is my exclusive domain because of my ethnic/cultural/gender/racial/national identity!")

*The [[User:Ritchie333|barely disguised personal and political biases of editors]], in spite of [[WP:NPOV]]. (And I am still expected to [[WP:Assume good faith]] with this editor?)

*The [[WP:Request for adminship]] process is not a process at all; most RfA's seem to be a foregone conclusion. "Oppose" voters are practically shouted down for daring to oppose an administrator-to-be. I watched from the sidlelines one particular RfA where the Support voters wanted to "stricken" an oppose vote while commenting "Don't worry, it's going to pass anyway". In a second RfA I watched as voters cast vote after vote opposing the candidate, calling him out for his repeated uncivil and rude behavior as an editor...naturally he passed and became an Administrator.

*Political correctness. For example, if you don't use the singular "they" (which I believe to be bad grammar) you might find yourself warned by an "experienced editor".


Latest revision as of 00:33, 28 July 2020


I started editing (mostly copy editing) in 2008 but now I think it's time to retire. There are several reasons for this, issues I see that have bothered me about Wikipedia for some time. Honestly, it's no longer an enjoyable hobby for me.

  • "Wikipedia has no firm rules", says the fifth pillar, yet there seems to be a small group of editors who will not hesitate to show you the firm rules and ensure that you conform to them. I am not bothered by having rules and enforcing them, but Wikipedia and its editors should be consistent in how they present themselves.
  • WP:Civility is routinely ignored. I witnessed an editor tell another editor to "fuck off"; subsequently, the profanity-using editor was defended because "he is a long-term editor" and because "fuck off" is common English that one can use anytime one feels upset!
  • The territorial attitude of many editors, posting on talk pages "Why did you make that edit?" (Read: "How dare you edit this article that is my exclusive domain because of my ethnic/cultural/gender/racial/national identity!")
  • The barely disguised personal and political biases of editors, in spite of WP:NPOV. (And I am still expected to WP:Assume good faith with this editor?)
  • The WP:Request for adminship process is not a process at all; most RfA's seem to be a foregone conclusion. "Oppose" voters are practically shouted down for daring to oppose an administrator-to-be. I watched from the sidlelines one particular RfA where the Support voters wanted to "stricken" an oppose vote while commenting "Don't worry, it's going to pass anyway". In a second RfA I watched as voters cast vote after vote opposing the candidate, calling him out for his repeated uncivil and rude behavior as an editor...naturally he passed and became an Administrator.
  • Political correctness. For example, if you don't use the singular "they" (which I believe to be bad grammar) you might find yourself warned by an "experienced editor".

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Foreignshore/sandbox&oldid=969893889"





    This page was last edited on 28 July 2020, at 00:33 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki