curprev14:2814:28, 29 December 2010 Balph Eubanktalkcontribs 396 bytes+28 rv. That's not what she changed, have a look at her edit. Consensus at AN/I was that he's indefinitely blocked. His userpage is not going anywhere, if someone unblocks him it's easy to revert a tag.undo
curprev16:2016:20, 28 December 2010 Balph Eubanktalkcontribs 16 bytes−352 Per discussion at AN/I, consensus is that he's indefinitely blocked. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive660#Vintagekits_seeks_unblock]undo
curprev18:3918:39, 18 November 2009 ThaddeusBtalkcontribs m483 bytes0 Protected User:Vintagekits: this has been changed back & forth enough times (and it doesn't really matter anyway); start a discussion if you must, but please stop edit warring over a silly tag ([edit=sysop] (expires 18:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)) [move=syundo
curprev15:0515:05, 12 November 2009 Ncmvocalisttalkcontribs 16 bytes−6 my bad; based on the comment on the talk page at the time, it seemed the wrong tag was here. that said, beebleb's tag was correct in that case as block is still standingundo