Contents

User talk:209.177.21.6: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:16, 21 May 2007

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

209.177.21.6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This IP address is not a sockpuppet of banned user User:Jessica Liao. This IP address did not even edit before it was blocked. I think this block is unjust. How can this IP address be blocked if it was not even active? And also this IP address never attempted to harass other users. That's a lie too. The administrator that blocked this IP address was blocking an innocent editor.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This IP address is not a sockpuppet of banned user [[User:Jessica Liao]]. This IP address did not even edit before it was blocked. I think this block is unjust. How can this IP address be blocked if it was not even active? And also this IP address never attempted to harass other users. That's a lie too. The administrator that blocked this IP address was blocking an innocent editor. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This IP address is not a sockpuppet of banned user [[User:Jessica Liao]]. This IP address did not even edit before it was blocked. I think this block is unjust. How can this IP address be blocked if it was not even active? And also this IP address never attempted to harass other users. That's a lie too. The administrator that blocked this IP address was blocking an innocent editor. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This IP address is not a sockpuppet of banned user [[User:Jessica Liao]]. This IP address did not even edit before it was blocked. I think this block is unjust. How can this IP address be blocked if it was not even active? And also this IP address never attempted to harass other users. That's a lie too. The administrator that blocked this IP address was blocking an innocent editor. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

It is suspected that this IP address might have been used by Jessica Liao. Please refer to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jessica Liao for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

Template:Do not delete

You can't assume that everyone on this IP is a puppeteer. Let's say someone messes up, then they will be accused for being Jessica. That's not fair. (Morrie)

• Archive of older vandalism warnings

Your reversion of this article is unsupported. As described at length on the talk page, there is an 80 to 1 ratio of references to "great neck south high school" vs. "great neck south senior high school". Click here for a statement on the school's web page which states "To our knowledge, we are the only PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL opera company in the nation." (emphasis added). Again, the issue is not that you can find the school referenced as a "senior high school". The issue is that the overwhelming usage is "great neck south high school" and we do have a reference to the school as a public high school. I encourage you to try to see that consensus supports this approach. Alansohn 21:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I would like to say something new Alansohn pretty much hit the nail on the head here. Your changes are less known and aren't from direct quotes from official school website. MrMacMan ^Talk 05:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's rather obvious that if the south high school is listed as a public highschool the entire district is. You know this but you make the changes anyway. Why? MrMacMan ^Talk 21:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for being a sockpuppet of banned user User:Jessica Liao. Fire Star 火星 04:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]