Contents

User talk:96.3.8.17: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:20, 7 April 2024

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Surprise (emotion), while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Andre🚐 02:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t revert my edits. 96.3.8.17 (talk) 02:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edittoPeggy Flanagan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 02:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t 96.3.8.17 (talk) 02:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be unblocked 96.3.8.17 (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.3.8.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked 96.3.8.17 (talk) 14:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No doubt. Why should you be unblocked? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

 Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DB1729. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edittoPeggy Flanagan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DB1729^talk 14:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Paul Giamatti, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd (talk) 21:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoMinnesota Territory. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments again, as you did at User talk:Firefangledfeathers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 21:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

your recent edit to the article was not sourced, and it was removed. Augmented Seventh (talk) 19:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributionstoTaste have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 19:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please teach me how to use the Sandbox? 96.3.8.17 (talk) 19:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you're adding the words Jeffery Dahmer to random articles.

please stop Augmented Seventh (talk) 19:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m very sorry, I was experimenting but I gotta use the sandbox. I’m not sure how to use it. Could you please teach me? 96.3.8.17 (talk) 19:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we have a discord call and you can teach me? 96.3.8.17 (talk) 19:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also see the edit to Sovereign state GenericUser24 (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Click on the link GenericUser24 (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t make those! Someone must’ve figured out my wifi password 96.3.8.17 (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]