Contents

User talk:Aecws: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:04, 19 March 2024

Hello, Aecws, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Quincy Railroad Co. 2, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  — Diannaa (talk) 22:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Quincy Railroad Co. 2 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://members.ncry.org/content.aspx?actr=4&club_id=541047&module_id=137777&page_id=22. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — Diannaa (talk) 22:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time [1] a draft you submitted (Draft:Canadian Pacific 2860) has included wholesale copyright infringement. Next time it happens, you are going to receive a one-way ticket to WP:ANI, understood? Either write articles in your own words, or find another hobby. Copying non-free work and posting it as your own is absolutely unacceptable and will result in your account being blocked. I don't know why you are using another editor's name as the submitter, but that needs to stop as well. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:38, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've done it again with this edit, haven't you? At least the copyvio detector gives 86% likelihood, based solely on the 'History' section you added, which seems to be a copypaste or at least very close paraphrasing from this source claiming copyright. What's going on here? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Given this user is refusing to communicate, and their most recent submission was still using “Mr Mines Engine” to fake their AFC creations, I think it might be time for some discussions at a higher level… Danners430 (talk) 09:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Canadian Pacific 2860. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Great Western 75. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 02:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Great Western 75 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello, Aecws! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to SECR P Class 323 Bluebell. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Викидим (talk) 04:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to GWR 3200 Class 9017 Earl of Berkeley. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Викидим (talk) 04:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to SECR P Class 27 Primrose. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Danners430 (talk) 07:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LSWR B4 class 96 Normandy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from similarity preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/30096-lswr-96-sr-e96-sr-96-br-30096 and bluebell-railway.co.uk/bluebell/pics/normandy.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SECR C Class 592 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/31592-secr-592-sr-a592-sr-1592-br-31592-ds-239/ and https://www.bluebell-railway.co.uk/bluebell/pics/c.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Aecws (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here 68.226.233.81 (talk) 08:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[Special:Contributions/68.226.233.81|68.226.233.81]] ([[User talk:68.226.233.81|talk]]) 08:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[Special:Contributions/68.226.233.81|68.226.233.81]] ([[User talk:68.226.233.81|talk]]) 08:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[Special:Contributions/68.226.233.81|68.226.233.81]] ([[User talk:68.226.233.81|talk]]) 08:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Aecws (talk) 15:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for all the trouble I just can't help myself. how long will that expires until I go back to editing? Aecws (talk) 14:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) You have been blocked indefinitely. And IMHO, saying you "can't help" causing trouble isn't really conducive to being unblocked.

Speaking of which, if you want an admin to consider your appeal, you need to format your unblock request as instructed in the block notice above. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Until you can help yourself. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]