Contents

User talk:AirWolf: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:45, 19 May 2018

Template:BC Astana current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 9#Template:Slovenia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Economy of Kosovo page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A4 motorway (Serbia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dimitrovgrad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cities in Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bač. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cabinet of Serbia (2001–04)

added a link pointing to Zoran Živković

Minister of Justice (Serbia)

added a link pointing to Zoran Živković

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:PS Fashion logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Equivalent media under a free license at Wikimedia Commons. Not F8 owing to the different licenses.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PS Fashion logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OJ (talk) 01:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the Wikipedias for the languages bg, pl, ru, sh, sq, sr there are dedicated articles for the municipalities. Municipality articles should list settlements (cities, towns, villages), show population data, locator map, district to which they belong. There may also be boundary changes, or the district to which a municipality belongs changed, e.g. pre-1999, under UNMIK after NATO invasion, after independence. Can you help to establish dedicated municipality articles?

I saw you edited information related to municipalities of Kosovo. User:PlyrStar93 is currently vandalising Đakovica Municipality, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C4%90akovica_Municipality&action=history, and like the NATO bombers, all he does is to revert, initiate blocks, spread misinformation etc. 78.55.249.107 (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen these pages previously. I have just recently started working on Kosovo's municipalities and improved several things, but will continue in the future. In my opinion, there shouldn't be duplicate articles like Gjakova and Đakovica Municipality, but there should be much better coverage in Gjakova and other Kosovo articles related to the issues you presented (2000 administrative changes, borders etc.) Currently, I don't have much time for Wikipedia, but as soon as I find it in the following weeks, I'll gladly look into problems. Thanks for mentioning!--AirWolf ^talk 21:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gjakova article in my opinion looks very good as far as text and provided images are in question. We'll work on its content in the future and Serbia-Kosovo dispute since 1990 (1998).--AirWolf ^talk 21:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as far as separate town and municipality articles are in question, please notice that all Serbian municipalities have the same issue. Several wikies kept both town and municipality articles, English Wikipedia merged them. Why and where was the discussion concerning this matter I don't have an answer, but will find it. For example, Montenegro's municipalities are still separate. We'll work on it.--AirWolf ^talk 21:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why should some of Ex-Yugoslavia be different from places all around the world? English Wikipedia has the entities commonly seperated. Administrative entities and physical towns are different objects. Entities of Serbia/Kosovo can have the same representation as the entities in other countries. To merge the content related to the administrative entity into the page of the physical entity is not supported by the view of the majority of the editors of administrative entities. Why extra treatment for Serbia/Kosovo? 78.55.210.87 (talk) 10:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, provide some valuable references for such remark - "view of the majority of the editors of administrative entities". Such remark has no fact support. As we can notice, over past decade editors have adopted unwritten style to keep town/city and municipality that are homonymous as merged. I agree with it, because in most cases they are similar in content and the law of named countries treats them that way (e.g. through census etc.). If we decide to split 200+ articles, much of the content would be duplicated which doesn't make any sense.--AirWolf ^talk 11:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asseco Prokom Gdynia current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

--'''[[User:AirWolf|<font color="DarkKhaki">AirWolf</font>]]''' [[User talk:AirWolf|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]]: --AirWolf ^talk

to

--'''[[User:AirWolf|<span style="color: DarkKhaki;">AirWolf</span>]]''' [[User talk:AirWolf|<span style="color: black;"><sup>talk</sup></span>]]: --AirWolf ^talk

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 07:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AirWolf, again, most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomalocaris: Done.--AirWolf ^talk 20:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 01:34, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Air Wolf, although both of us mainly edit on English Wikipedia, since I see on your user page that you are a native Serbian speaker I will adress you in Serbian in order to avoid any chance of misunderstanding.

Pre svega, želim da ti ukažem da sam pre nekih pola godine temeljno uredio i reorganizovao članak o Železnicama Srbije na engleskom koji je do tada bio potpuno nepregledan i, sa stanovišta informacija koje je pružao, nedovoljan. Tom prilikom sam napisao neka nova poglavlja (poglavlje o Putničkom saobraćaju si vidim iskoristio u članku o Srbija Vozu odnosno celokupno poglavlje si prebacio tamo), druga doradio i uopšte ceo članak uredio na način da bude što pregledniji i logičniji u svojoj strukturi. Takođe, ideja vodilja pri tom letošnjem uređivanju članka je bila da po koncepciji članak bude što sličniji člancima na engleskoj Vikipediji o državnim železničkim kompanijama zemalja u susedstvu koje su slične『Železnicama Srbije』i koje su prošle kroz praktično istovetne procese restrukturiranja. Plan restruktuiranja koji je usvojen i sproveden 2015. nije neki sui generis slučaj i proizvod "domaće pameti", nego maltene prepisan model restruktuiranja po kome su restruktuirane državne železničke kompanije u Srbiji susednim zemljama a verovatno i u ostatku tranzicionih zemalja centralne i istočne Evrope. Hrvatski HŽ je na taj način restruktuiran još 2005. godine, bugarski BDŽ 2007, rumunski CFR 2011., itd. [1] [2][3]

Restruktuiranje se izvršilo na način da su se iz prethodnog jedinstvenog preduzeća izdvojila zasebna preduzeća za putnički prevoz, za prevoz robe i za upravljanje infrastrukturom ali i da su sva ta preduzeća ostala u poslovnoj zajednici odnosno holdingu sa matičnim preduzećem, u srpskom slučaju, "Železnicama Srbije" koje su jedini akcionar tih novosnovanih preduzeća. Da je to tako govore osnivačka akta tih novosnovanih preduzeća. Tako u Odluci o osnivanju『Infrastrukture Železnice Srbije』u članu 4 je navedeno: Osnivač Društva je Republika Srbija, kao jedini akcionar『Železnice Srbije』akcionarsko društvo u čije ime osnivačka prava ostvaruje Vlada.[4] Dakle, Železnice Srbije su jedini akcionar tih preduzeća a Vlada Republike Srbije ostvaruje osnivačka prava u ime tog društva tj.『Železnica Srbije』a.d. kao matičnog preduzeča. Ima mnoštvo primera u kojima se vidi funkcionalna veza sa『Železnicama Srbije』kao matičnim preduzećem - tako npr. član 35 Statuta "Srbija karga" propisuje da Društvo objavljuje opšta akta u "Službenom glasniku Železnica Srbije".[5] Nadalje, svi planovi restruktuiranja su rađeni na nivou『Železnica Srbije』kao celine: optimizacija broja zaposlenih se odnosi za sva 4 preduzeća zajedno jer ista čine holding odnosno poslovnu zajednicu (iako su odvojena preduzeća što nisam ni sporio). Štaviše, u izvoru koji si ti stavio u svom uređivanju članka jasno je navedeno da "Železnice Srbije" imaju 17.635 zaposlenih (uključujući naravno sva 4 preduzeća).[6]

Tvoja analogija sa Elektromrežama Srbije nije baš najbolja, s obzirom da se radi o kompaniji koja jeste nastala izdvajanjem iz EPS-a ali od tada funkcioniše kao potpuno zasebna kompanija sa zasebnim akcijskim kapitalom (bez učešća EPS-a u kapitalu), za razliku od slučaja sa restruktuiranjem Železnica gde je ovim izdvojenim kompanijama jedini akcionar Železnice Srbije. Ako baš hoćeš primer EPS-a, adekvatna paralela sa ovim procesom u Železnicama bi bio njihov postupak restruktuiranja iz 2014. i 2015. kad su se iz EPS-a izdvojila EPS Distribucija i EPS Snabdevanje kao samostalna preduzeća ali koja čine holding sa EPS-om kao matičnim preduzećem i čiji je EPS jedini akcionar.

Eto, nadam se da sam bio od pomoći.

Srdačan pozdrav

Klačko (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Telenor Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LTE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
10		Boyer's Food Markets, Inc. (talk)	Add sources
20		Prointer IT Solutions & Services (talk)	Add sources
12		Seessel's (talk)	Add sources
14		Festival Foods (Minnesota) (talk)	Add sources
6,691		Serbia (talk)	Add sources
458		Niš (talk)	Add sources
59		Big Bear Stores (talk)	Cleanup
138		Price Chopper Supermarkets (talk)	Cleanup
579		Novi Sad (talk)	Cleanup
5		Serbian Railways Infrastructure (talk)	Expand
16		Southern Family Markets (talk)	Expand
137		Hannaford Brothers Company (talk)	Expand
35		Omni Superstore (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,878		Kosovo War (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
40		Nugget Markets (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
114		Genesee Brewing Company (talk)	Merge
25		Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co. (talk)	Merge
140		Borden (company) (talk)	Merge
10		Deskins (talk)	Wikify
6		South East Europe Media Organisation (talk)	Wikify
135		Economy of Paraguay (talk)	Wikify
5		Mali Krivelj mine (talk)	Orphan
6		Jadar mine (talk)	Orphan
32		Retail Solutions Inc. (talk)	Orphan
18		168 Market (talk)	Stub
12		Byrd's (talk)	Stub
11		Srbija Voz (talk)	Stub
12		Lion Supermarket (talk)	Stub
31		Komercijalna banka (talk)	Stub
9		Industrija mesa Matijević (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mr Airwolf, Ja sam kreirao stranicu i održavam je. Meni je pravljenje članaka na Wiki praktični deo doktorske disertacije iz oblasti Marketing metrike. Ja sam se već pozvao na stranicu Dunav osiguranje wiki i detaljno je opisao u svom radu koji treba uskoro da branim. Zamolio bih te da se zadrži stranica u obliku kakvom je sada da ne bih morao sve da prepravljam. U pitanju je stil, ništa nije sporno u relevantnosti podataka, Wiki zajednica ne ulazi u konflikte po pitanju estetike i stila. Što se tiče rešenja za Ostale polise (Other polices) tu se apsolutno slažem. S poštovanjem, Mihailo79 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Prointer IT Solutions & Services has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of actual notability --

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The one who pointed out that to you is obviously not familiar with this subject and the way this is handled in Serbia. Since 2006 all municipalites which are constituting cities are officially called City Municipality, or Gradska Opština. I tried to explain that , but you deleted it anyway. That is fully applied only in Belgrade and Niš, and partially in Vranje, Užice, Požarevac and Novi Sad. That doesn’t mean that it is urban, as opposed to rural, but that it administratively constitutes a larger city. It is not an independent municipality, but part of something. Former popular division in Belgrade, on 10 urban and 6 suburban municiaplites (Surčin came later) was never official administrative division, but a practical and colloquial one. Present city administration announced that it will divide the municiaplities in the urban/suburban manner, but it hasn’t happen yet. So, city municipality is part of the city whether it is statistically or practically urban or suburban or rural or mixed.

Also, there is a difference between the (regular) municipality and city municipality. City municipalities are lesser municipalities when it comes to the jurisdiction they have as many of their administrative rights and powers have been transferred to the city level. So, Municipality of Crna Trava, with 1,000 people, has more administrative jurisdiction over its territory, than City Municipality of New Belgrade, with 215,000 inhabitants which is part of the City of Belgrade.

As for the „city municipality“ as an idiom, it is possible that there is a better term, but urban is neither synonymous nor correct in this case. Statistically speaking, there is only a handfull of “urban neighborhoods“ in Serbia, that is, those which have no rural parts: city municipalities of Savski Venac, Vračar, Stari Grad, Zvezdara, Rakovica (all in Belgrade) and Sevojno (in Užice) and municipality of Sremski Karlovci. Still, there are articles on Wikipedia which have City Municipality in their titles, there are half milion hits on Google and you can also check specialized sites, like this one: http://www.citypopulation.de/php/serbia-admin.php So, I will edit it back, maybe with an explanation so that it will be obvious why they are called that way. Regards PajaBG (talk) 14:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Who told you that it makes no sense? Why it makes no sense? There is an 8 years old redirect link for city municipality on this very encyclopedia and on the municipality page to which it redirects there are two mentions of city municipalities. It is not a bad move that you created articles on city municipalities. I really don’t understand you. And by the way there isn’t any kind of division of Belgrade city municipalities, urban, suburban, whatever. They are all the equal. On Wikipedia there are 11 pages for city municipalities in Slovenia, articles on city municipalities in Lithuania, administrative division of Thailand, municipalities in Montenegro…Just look how much Slovenes spread the usage of the term, there are over 500 pages, why are you so afraid of the administrators? With everything I wrote to you previously, my suggestion is to keep city municipality cause I’m afraid that you are not making sense, not the term, cause it is the official, legal name of those municipalities which is simply mentioned in one line in the entire article and you are making all this fuss about it? PajaBG (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rename these articles:

• Category:Defunct urban municipalities of Kragujevac -> Category:Former urban municipalities of Kragujevac
• Category:Defunct urban municipalities of Novi Sad -> Category:Former urban municipalities of Novi Sad
• City municipality of Novi Sad -> Urban municipality of Novi Sad
• City municipality of Vranje -> Urban municipality of Vranje
• City municipality of Požarevac -> Urban municipality of Požarevac

--SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should not the name of the municipality be written capital letters, example: Urban/City Municipality of Novi Sad, not Urban/City municipality of Novi Sad ? --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Urban Municipality of Novi Sad, this article needs to be deleted, it's unnecessary, there is not even on Wikipedia in Serbian language --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Tell him to wipe that article --SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Frankly, I would suggest to you to let sleeping dogs lie, that is, not to open the question of “city municipality” yourself. If someone has a problem with it, then you/we should react. That is the legal name in Serbia, Slovenia, Lithuania, etc., and if the coinage didn’t exist until now in English language, then we can say that we enriched it. And why shouldn’t English being under the influence from other languages? Dozens of anglicisms enter Serbian language every year, we change our syntax to accommodate the literal translation from English, while we change the pronunciation rules because of it (do you know that correct transliteration of McDonald’s is Megdonald?). Word “city” is indeed a noun, but if it acts as an adjective in city borough and city neighborhood, how is municipality a problem? Plus numerous other cases in which “city” functions this way: city hall, city park, city clerk, city administration, city government, city park, city slicker, city council, city room, city manager…So, I don’t think there is a need for you to ‘’pick on she-bear’’ :)

And now for something completely different. I see that you made a map of Belgrade which you placed on the municipalities page. Do you plan to make a pushpin-type map for Belgrade, which would be used on the pages for the settlements in the city area? PajaBG (talk) 22:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reference. Do you feel this read correctly: "In the end, the financing consisted an investment by the government of Serbia of more than €300 million, partially in credit extended by European Investment Bank, along with contributions by Fiat of €200 million as well as a €200 million guarantee from Servizi Assicurativi del Commercio Estero (SACE)"? 842U (talk)

@842U: In my opinion, this is a way it should be written; I hope that I was of any help - "In the end, the financing consisted of €300 million investment by the Government of Serbia (through loan by the European Investment Bank), along with €200 million worth contributions by Fiat, as well as a €200 million guarantee by the Servizi Assicurativi del Commercio Estero (SACE). In total, total financing costs are estimated to be around €700 million".--AirWolf ^talk 11:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree that reads better.842U (talk) 03:32, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside, AirWolf, do you know if Kragujevac was damaged in the 2014 flooding in southeast Europe?

@842U: Yes, there were floods, but they haven't caused much damage as in other cities - [7]. --AirWolf ^talk 13:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just as information in regards to your AIV report, any user can boldly redirect an article. A talk page discussion or template is not required first. It's a bold edit (See WP:BRD) and you reverted, which is fine. It is not vandalism. If the editor was edit warring over the redirect, that would be a different issue. -- ferret (talk) 13:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leoni Wiring Systems Southeast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leoni Wiring Systems Southeast until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 13:34, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leoni Wiring Systems Southeast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leoni Wiring Systems Southeast (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Trayal Corporation. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: Hi Cwmhiraeth. Thanks for the note. Even though I have uploaded article, much of the "history content" came from another user's sandbox. I have made many fixes before uploading it. However, there's always room for errors possible (not reviewing the whole content).--AirWolf ^talk 10:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. The revision deletion will make the copyright-infringing versions of the article unavailable to access via the history tag, but when that's been done, you can add back some information on the earlier history of the company if you wish. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to March 12, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 17:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mufka: How can this edit [8] be the subject of eventual dispute?--AirWolf ^talk 17:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any time content is added to a page, and it isn't a correction of a typo or removal of vandalism, it cannot be considered minor per WP:MINOR. It doesn't matter if you think it's a perfectly appropriate addition and couldn't possibly be incorrect. I see this edit you did also. In that case you added unsourced information. Even if it was sourced, it couldn't be marked as minor. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 20:44, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]