|
No edit summary
|
3RR violation, and need citation / reference for the claim
|
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Neither is there a source for Runeberg being the national poet of Finland. So stop immediately reverting the correction of that sourceless claim and abusing this platform.--[[User:Argh|Argh]] ([[User talk:Argh#top|talk]]) 12:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC) |
:Neither is there a source for Runeberg being the national poet of Finland. So stop immediately reverting the correction of that sourceless claim and abusing this platform.--[[User:Argh|Argh]] ([[User talk:Argh#top|talk]]) 12:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
::Argh, even if what you're saying is true, there are two serious problems. One, the {{3RR}} has been violated on the page by you, and by itself allows any uninvolved administrator to block you for revert warning now. I believe you didn't know about that, but it applies and you're already into blockable territory. |
|||
::Two, you need to provide a reference (citation to book, magazine, journal, Finnish cultural website, etc) which justifies the claim. The other information is cited, that claim needs a reference too. You aren't supposed to re-add anything that's contested without citing it. Please stop fighting here, go get the information to justify the claim, and then come back and discuss the citation on preferably the article talk page to get consensus before you add it. |
|||
::[[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 12:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
} Hello, an edit that you recently made seemed to be vandalism and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. --Nitraus (talk) 12:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Nitraus (talk) 12:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is not vandalism. Eino Leino is the national poet of Finland. But I assume you can abuse your position by making this vandalism claim. --Argh (talk) 12:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. has been violated on the page by you, and by itself allows any uninvolved administrator to block you for revert warning now. I believe you didn't know about that, but it applies and you're already into blockable territory.
