Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Rangerboard discussion  
4 comments  




2 Re: Voice actors  
1 comment  




3 Sport Ranger  
1 comment  




4 Defender Vest  
1 comment  




5 [Moved from user page]  
1 comment  




6 DC Meetup notice  
1 comment  




7 So, the Smash Brothers Series page...  
1 comment  




8 Super smash bros  
1 comment  




9 Samus Aran  
2 comments  




10 Mother Brain in Aurora Units  
2 comments  




11 Metroid  
1 comment  




12 "That's really unnessacary"  
1 comment  




13 List of Japanese N64 games  
1 comment  




14 Sorry  
1 comment  




15 requesting reason that you undid "Playable Stages" section  
1 comment  




16 Playable Characters in Brawl  
1 comment  




17 Episodes  
2 comments  




18 Re: List of Japanese N64 games  
1 comment  




19 Smash Bros. Brawl box...  
1 comment  




20 October 2007  
1 comment  




21 New Userbox  
1 comment  




22 DC meetup #3  
1 comment  




23 Imp'ed  
1 comment  




24 Removal of hidden SSBS tags  
3 comments  




25 The spam  
3 comments  




26 I'm Sorry  





27 Several months prior?  
1 comment  




28 Gender?  
4 comments  




29 My mistake  
2 comments  




30 Dr. Mario in Brawl?  
3 comments  




31 Subrosians  
2 comments  




32 Revert  
2 comments  




33 Pronunciation  
3 comments  




34 Youtube  
2 comments  




35 DC Meetup on May 17th  
1 comment  




36 Re:Read the discussion above this one  
1 comment  




37 Final Fantasy VII featured article review  
1 comment  




38 Toku.  
1 comment  




39 Administrator?  
2 comments  




40 Wikipedia meetup  
1 comment  




41 Hey, saw you at smash wiki  
1 comment  




42 Question  
2 comments  




43 Brawl  
1 comment  




44 Metroid Prime/ Metroid Fusion release date.  
1 comment  




45 Metroid II:Return of Samus  
3 comments  













User talk:Arrowned




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









User page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
User contributions
User logs
View user groups
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.28.138.83 (talk)at20:34, 26 August 2008 (Metroid II:Return of Samus: - all right). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff)  Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision  (diff)

NOTE: I will reply to messages here, rather than at other people's talk pages.


Rangerboard discussion

Thank you for assisting me over at RB (at least I think its you). Ryūlóng 08:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's me. No problem at all. In fact, should I copy my post into the OO talk page? Perhaps centering everyone on the true issue will allow for some conversation that isn't full of constant arguing. Arrow 08:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It would be good if you copied your post at RB over to the OO talk. It would clear a lot of things up, and get the RB monkeys off my back (sorry that I did not reply earlier, I usually get replies on my talk page). Ryūlóng 09:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can chime in at Talk:Power Rangers: Mystic Force, as well, to at least contribute to the discussion. Ryūlóng 03:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Voice actors

The article I'm refering to in Game Informer is titled "Behind the Mic" (Issue 161, Sept 2006 pg. 18). It features Jennifer Hale and another voice actor (Cam Clarke). A box in the middle of the page lists "notable game roles" and the Metroid Prime series is listed saying that she did voice Samus Aran in those games. I'm also going to request a complete list of her works from her website if this isn't proof enough. Hopefully it'll have what I'm after. -SaturnYoshi 00:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sport Ranger

Is there anything new on this front? Was it cancelled or something? Ryūlóng 21:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Defender Vest

Thanks for helping me out with fixing the page and placing my picture in the correct area of the page. RedLifeguardRanger 22:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Moved from user page]

I wasn't sure if that combo did exist until I watched the episode again and you were right no shovel and crane combo sorry. Ok since you pointed it never appeared in Boukenger as well then ok I will not add it. The only reason I assumed that combo was in OO and Boukenger because of the shovel and crane being called but were damaged before they could merge with Daibouken/DriveMax Megazord. Again sorry for the confusion I cause. RedLifeguardRanger 04:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DC Meetup notice

Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in Category:Wikipedians_in_Maryland, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 00:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, the Smash Brothers Series page...

Is being edited by someone who keeps checking off Sheik and Ganondorf...he then tried to use the "Do you have the game" line on me that's being used in the hidden text. Would you mind doing something? Thakn you kindly, buku! -Sukecchi 20:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super smash bros

I had NO idea how do undo that, thanks for clearing it up. DurinsBane87 01:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Samus Aran

Hi. I noticed you did as I did a while back and reverted the edit by an IP who removed "female" from that certain sentence. He/She went on a rant on my talk page explaining it. Although I believe MOS says he/she's wrong, I just wanted to tell you about it so you could see his/her point of view, but please correct me if I am wrong (the last time I read MOS was about 6 months ago).
--FastLizard4 (TalkLinksSign) 06:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely forgot to link to the section on my talk page! I thought I was forgetting something... User talk:FastLizard4#Samus Aran
--FastLizard4 (TalkLinksSign) 06:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mother Brain in Aurora Units

I can't make out the last sentence of what you wrote when you replaced my editing in the Aurora Units article. If I don't understand it, then others will have problems as well. Try to rephrase that last sentence and use the Metroid E-Mange link I provided since it's a source. Duhman0009 19:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why would being an Aurora Unit contradict the Metroid E-Manga and what are these other sources anyway? Duhman0009 19:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metroid

Sorry, I was just basing my revert on the edit summary. I'll be more careful next time. DurinsBane87 07:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"That's really unnessacary"

I personally don't think that my addition to the MP: 3 Article was "unnessacary". It is, at least in my opinion, a milestone. Now, I'm not readding it unless we resolve it (and agree, not like I would if we decide otherwise) but maybe we need a third opinion or something. --Jump! Slash! Dash! Ouch! Super Mario SonicBOOM! 16:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

The redesign marked a change to a pure out of 10 rating style. On that notion, you could mention that Super Mario Sunshine could be given a milestone because it was one of several that got a 5/5. MP: 3 was, like I said, the first one to get a perfect ten under the new scale. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mario Sonicboom (talkcontribs) 19:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


List of Japanese N64 games

I noticed your one of the people that wished there to be a list of Japanese games online for Wikipedia which I tried to make for the Nintendo 64 a few months ago, but just like when they where added to the orginal List of Nintendo 64 games they are trying to delete the new page List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games here's a link Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games to the discussion, how about giving your view. (Floppydog66 16:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry

Thanks for that message I'll refrain from personal attacks. I don't know how to send messages on this thing so this is how I'm sayin it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madhatter9max (talkcontribs) 19:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

requesting reason that you undid "Playable Stages" section

I am currently wondering why you undid my entry with the playable stages section at the SSBB srticle. Please respond, thanks. Spitfire 20:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Playable Characters in Brawl

Who has a good chance for being in Brawl Princess Daisy (Mario Series), Amy Rose (Sonic The Hedgehog Series) or Lilina from the Fire Emblem Series? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.162.108.99 (talkcontribs)

None of them, in my opinion. Daisy will likely just be a Peach alt-color like in Melee; Lyn was an assist trophy, so the chances of any FE character besides Ike (or maybe Marth and Roy) are slim to none; and if any other Sonic character appears, it will likely be Tails or Knuckles on an outside chance.
By the way, the official article for Brawl, as well as its FAQ in the talk page, are not places to add your ideas on who will be in it. Those pages are encyclopedic entries with factual information. If you'd like to discuss who you think would be in the game, it would be better to do so on your own talk page or on a forum not related to Wikipedia. Arrowned 22:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

And how do you know that episode info is confidential? I could say the last ones post on Overdrive are just rumoured as well. The Technodrome's Toilet 06:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I've stepped into someone's territory. Some guy named User:Ryulong is threating me with a block. I don't know if you know this guy but he seems upset. I see you're into Legend of Zelda games so maybe I'll edit there. The Technodrome's Toilet 06:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Re: List of Japanese N64 games

Sorry for the inconvenience, I also didn't know if I should make this talk or add it to the one above, because you might not expect more to be added above and might miss it. Before I sent the above message I searched for Contributors that had made changes to listing that had Japanese video games, mostly Famicom, Super Famicom, N64 and a few others like Doraemon. I was able to find that you where one of those who contributed to Famicom list.

I figured if a person contributed to the list either for the better or deleting something that they didn't like at least they'd have a opinion about how the games on the Japanese pages where listed, I still thing the table version is the best, but also they might be familiar with Japanese listings and spot any mistakes in spelling and in general set up of the page, as well as telling if it had useful information or was simply more of a fan thing that wouldn't be very useful to anyone else. Thankfully it was shown to be useful and the information is required to be incorporated into the regular list of N64 games, which was what I tried to do in the first place. Sorry again, I hope you'll continue helping to make things in Japanese more clear to English users of Wikipedia. I also wrote another apology on my talk page after reading your message. (Floppydog66 13:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Smash Bros. Brawl box...

Sorry. I overlooked the resolution thing. Lowered it to match the one you had, and I also updated the source (Wal-Mart's online store). I really wanted this version of the box over the one you were using because this one doesn't have that nasty ugly blue overtone. -Crimsonseiko 23:51, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Power Rangers: Operation Overdrive. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Gscshoyru 01:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Userbox

This user is respected by Tinkleheimer and has done great work in Tinkleheimer's eyes.


I made my very first userbox and am passing it out. I won't be terribly offended if don't put it on your page. And if you want to make one for yourself, just create a subpage under your user page and just copy/paste the code from User:Tinkleheimer/RespectedByTinkleheimer. Thanks!!Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 02:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DC meetup #3

Interested in meeting-up with a bunch of your wiki-friends? Please take a quick look at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 3 and give your input about the next meetup. Thank you.
This automated notice was delivered to you because you are on the Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite. BrownBot 01:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imp'ed

You got impersonated. I have warned him in no uncertain terms that the next imp will earn him a block. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 06:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of hidden SSBS tags

I took them out, but you reverted my edit, saying that they were doing some good by being there. It's not a hill to die on, since they're not harming anything, but my point is that we are only fostering the mass paranoia that those boards are infested with. You posit that they prevent people from adding them to the article, but I haven't seen any difference in the addition of unconfirmed characters for ones with tags and ones without. In addition, shortly after you reverted my removal, an IP attempted to add in Mega Man repeatedly, with the tag displayed right above the edit. Can you provide any further justification for why those tags should remain? Coreycubed (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And again, with Jigglypuff: [1] That wasn't even one of the ones I wanted to remove (only the really fringe speculation / unknown Assist Trophies). Coreycubed (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice wording on the March release hidden tag. I swear, I want to reach through the screen and whack these guys. I think if I even dared to check the slimy, gurgling pit that is SmashBoards, I'd have an aneurysm. Coreycubed (talk) 04:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The spam

The link Mr. 'I don't use Wikipedia enough to register' has continually added that link since last night. He doesn't seem to want to stop. He's added it on the Smash talk page and on the Sonic Riders Zero Gravity talk page. I even wrote on his IP Address talk page and he still didn't stop. -Sukecchi (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on my talk page. -Sukecchi (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He did it again. But this time he said in response to a user asking if he had AIM: 'I don't have AIM, but I will be here a lot: -Link to his site-'. I removed it again and linked to WP:SPAM again. -Sukecchi (talk) 01:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry

I'm sorry, I am extremely new to wikipedia and I didn't initially know where to find a edit summary, or there even was one. I ddin't mean to jump the gun, but from my perspective it just looked like someone was constantly deleting my questions. I will make sure to check things like the FAQ in the future, but thankyou for explaining the situation to me. **BM** 00:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Several months prior?

When your userpage states "I've been editing various articles on en:Wikipedia since April of 2006 under this username (for several months prior anonymously)". How many months prior do you mean by "several months prior anonymously", and what is the first month and year prior you started editing?. Mythdon (talk) 04:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gender?

Are you male or female?. I assume your male. Mythdon (talk) 02:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Male. Arrowned (talk) 02:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That quite obvious, because of the userboxes on your userpage. Mythdon (talk) 02:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heh. I suppose you could guess based on the sheer amount of geek interests, but I just added two userboxes to make it unquestionable. Arrowned (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake

It was with a bunch of other hidden tags, I missed it. Thanks :) --Coreycubed (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. Arrowned (talk) 05:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Mario in Brawl?

I really want to know if it's true that Dr. Mario is an alt costume in Brawl, because I can't find any evidence of it. The Dr. Mario page says there is some remnant code left over because they intended to include him, but didn't in the end. Any evidence? Thanks.VatoFirme (talk) 21:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wrong; I'm sorry for confusing everybody. All the costume variations can be seen here. Arrowned (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AWWWWWWWWWWWWWW bummer!! I loved Dr. Mario. Oh well. Thanks for the clarification.VatoFirme (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subrosians

They actually are in ages, though the edit was correct - there are no Ore Chunks in Ages.

Just FYI.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 23:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My fault. I knew there was something about them that wasn't in one of the games, but it's been several years since I'd played both, and the details slipped my mind. Arrowned (talk) 23:54, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

I think it's relevant to the page, as JUSTIN BAILEY is usually publicized as a password by which you can get to the "best ending." http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMetroid&diff=194030665&oldid=194028875 129.174.91.116 (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But what you're asking is going into gameguide material. Even if there is a time limit, what it is doesn't matter to the purpose of the article if you're still able to get the best ending with it. Arrowned (talk) 23:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

How do you pronounce your username?. Mythdon (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Air-owned, basically. Arrowned (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for telling me. Mythdon (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube

Hello. I want to know if you are the same Arrowned from Youtube. Here is a link to the channel at: http://www.youtube.com/user/arrowned. Mythdon (talk) 07:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's me, though since I have very little video making skill, I use that account entirely for playlists/subscriptions. Arrowned (talk) 11:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DC Meetup on May 17th

Your help is needed in planning Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4! Any comments or suggestions you have are greatly appreciated. The Placebo Effect (talk) 18:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Read the discussion above this one

Oh... I feel kind of stupid now... I should check Wikipedia more instead of brawling.--Smashbrosboy 23:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy VII featured article review

Final Fantasy VII has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. FightingStreet (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toku.

Perhaps you've seen my idea? I'd like some thoughts on this from people in the project. Dragondragon hasn't said a word since the last time I suggested it, so if some other people backed me up, it might actually work. Howa0082 (talk) 16:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator?

Are you an Administrator?. Mythdon (talk) 00:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not. I don't think I'd have the time for such a responsibility anyways. Arrowned (talk) 11:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia meetup

As someone who may live or work near Washington D.C., you may be interested - if you've not heard already - about the meetup scheduled for Saturday, May 17th, at Union Station. For details, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4.

You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians in Maryland. MelonBot (STOP!) 18:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hey, saw you at smash wiki

I am smashingjohn there, just interesting to see you at two different places, was very suprised when I saw arrowned, I was like, 8o Timetobrawl (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

from WikiProject Video games

Link I don't want to start fighting again but please GAMEFAQs, GAMESTOP, TOYSRUS. are not sources they seem to be I also thought they were sources until I went to SSBB (Super Smash Brother Brwal) page and they were all yelling at me for adding GAMEFAQs, GAMESTOP, TOYSRUS as sources.--Lbrun12415 20:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Wow, be quiet. After you continuously vandalized my statement, I have decided to be done with you. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Are Gamefaqs, GAMESTOP, TOYSRUS sources ?--Lbrun12415 20:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to release dates for games that aren't out yet, they're not reputable. GameFAQs is a user-submission site, just like Wikipedia (such sites are never used as sources if there's better alternatives). Vendors like GameStop and TRU always use "best guess" release dates until companies actually give actual confirmed ones. If the game is already out, they could probably be used, but it's best to get a better source at that point anyways, since there would be a lot more sites, including more reputable ones, who give the same data. WP:VG/DATE has more information on all this. Arrowned (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brawl

Hey, just wanted to ask. Do you think Brawl is ready for a second attempt at the FAC? I think I should try it, just to see. But if I nominate it, would you like to help as co-nom? I found it incredibly tiring last time to nominate an article by itself, although there should be less problems now that the article has improved drastically since. --haha169 (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metroid Prime/ Metroid Fusion release date.

A very good rule of thumb on release dates (especially for Nintendo games) is to actually look at what days the conflicting information tells you. For instance, various sources are reporting the release dates for MP were November 17th, 18th, and 19th of 2002. The 17th was a Sunday, the 18th was a Monday, and the 19th was a Tuesday. For Nintendo, they only release their products on 2 specific days: Sunday and Tuesday. The only time a Nintendo product is released on a Sunday, is if the product is a highly anticipated product with inevitable large sales. (Wii, NDS, NDS Lite, SSBB, Pokemon: D & P, are great examples). At the time, MP and MF were highly anticipated, but were not expected to sell above the 200K mark each for that week, thus leaving the only option to release it on a Tuesday (19th). Plus, about 99.5% of the time, no game will ever, or has ever, been officially released on a Monday. It's a shipping date. On top of all that, I was one of those people who were eagerly expecting Metroid Prime, counted down until it's release, and joyfully picked up my copy on November 19th, 2002.

I hope I clarified a few things up for you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.149.164.164 (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metroid II:Return of Samus

On the talk page, it seems an anonymous user is upset that the information about a fan-based colorization project keeps getting deleted. On my last deletion, he posted a number of sites that apparently discuss the project, but none of them seem notable to me. Can you poke your head in and give an opinion about the matter? Thanks. King Zeal (talk) 17:03, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Level Opacity, though a very pretty site, seems to me to be little more than the blog and project database of a single programmer, and isn't really notable. Internode, on the other hand, is an offshoot of an Australian net provider and, while not the first site I'd think of to pull a citation from, is legitimate enough to work. Arrowned (talk) 20:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize to both of you about, perhaps, the limited nature of the site resources I can provide. I would suggest that the reason why IGN and others haven't commented on the widespread nature of these remake projects is the fact that they are all highly illegal. Both the M2DX project (which involves modification of proprietary code and distribution of those modifications) and the full remakes violate copyright in a significant way- the former via methodology and bits of code, the latter completely since it uses Nintendo's own artwork as a foundation, PLUS is a derivative work. I just hope that, given the providing of sources, that we can at the least let the acknowledgment of the existence of these things remain. 76.28.138.83 (talk) 20:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arrowned&oldid=234427329"





This page was last edited on 26 August 2008, at 20:34 (UTC).

This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki