No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
|
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:AuburnPilot/Archive 6) (bot
|
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<!-------DO NOT EDIT TEXT ABOVE THIS LINE-------> |
<!-------DO NOT EDIT TEXT ABOVE THIS LINE-------> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
== New administrator activity requirement == |
|||
{{ivmbox|The administrator policy has been updated with new [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural_removal_for_inactive_administrators|activity requirements]] following a successful [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Request for comment on administrator activity requirements|Request for Comment]]. |
|||
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have: |
|||
#Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR |
|||
#Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period |
|||
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work. |
|||
}} |
|||
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_administrators&oldid=1082922312 --> |
|||
== [[Elliott from Earth]] == |
|||
Hello! I'd noticed that on [[User:BrickMaster02]]'s talk page you'd previously discussed current edits going on at the [[Elliott from Earth]] page regarding the airdates for the full series listed in the infobox. I'm not sure if a conclusion was ever reached on those, but as far as I'd seen it seemed like the conclusion was that, without an official confirmation for a series being finished, there should not be a listed end date in the infobox (also, in the style guide they'd linked I never saw anything about listing an end date if a "full year" had passed after the last premiere like they had been saying. Much of this seems like it could count as insertion of original research). When I tried to leave a message on their talk page asking about it before editing again, it seems like they deleted the entire section afterward without ever responding. Multiple editors have sought to revert their changes to this part of the page before, and my attempt to discuss it and reach a conclusion was deleted. Should this be dealt with as edit warring? I'm hoping that a consensus or some sort of action can be taken soon so that this conflict on the article can be figured out and solidly resolved. Thank you, [[User:Babbledrogenthusiast|Babbledrogenthusiast]] ([[User talk:Babbledrogenthusiast|talk]]) 13:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
Ifpage protection prevents you from leaving a comment below, please use User talk:AuburnPilot/unprotected.
I do not now, nor have I ever, used the name AuburnPilot for any purposes other than those related to my work on Wikipedia.
![]() |
---|
4 July 2024 |
|
|
Action | Count |
---|---|
Edits | 25126 |
Edits+Deleted | 28411 |
Pages deleted | 3313 |
Revisions deleted | 7 |
Pages restored | 248 |
Pages protected | 537 |
Pages unprotected | 70 |
Protections modified | 55 |
Users blocked | 1223 |
Users reblocked | 30 |
Users unblocked | 145 |
User rights modified | 20 |
Users created | 6 |