|
|
m Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:DeCausa/Archive 10) (bot
|
||
| (37 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo=old(30d) | archive=User talk:DeCausa/Archive %(counter)d | counter=10| maxarchivesize=75K | archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadsleft=3 | minthreadstoarchive=1 }} |
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo=old(30d) | archive=User talk:DeCausa/Archive %(counter)d | counter=10| maxarchivesize=75K | archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadsleft=3 | minthreadstoarchive=1 }} |
||
== [[Talk:Parmesan#Parmesan vs. Parmigiano-Reggiano]] == |
|||
== Friendly hello == |
|||
Hi, in this discussion, so as not to create further misunderstandings, is it possible to change the title of the question? (spelled without dash, https://www.parmigianoreggiano.com/it/). [[User:JackkBrown|JacktheBrown]] ([[User talk:JackkBrown|talk]]) 23:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, how are you? I'm just dropping in because we edit some of the same pages, and I find it's good to understand a fellow editor beyond 'that person who keeps disagreeing with me'. Are you working on anything interesting at the moment? Best wishes, [[User:A.D.Hope|A.D.Hope]] ([[User talk:A.D.Hope|talk]]) 19:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
: |
:That can be discussed in the thread. There's no needtoalter other editors' posts per [[WP:TPO]]. The editor who originally posted that may haveapov thatitshould haveadash and that is their prerogative. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 23:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
::{{Ping|DeCausa}} all right, thank you very much! [[User:JackkBrown|JacktheBrown]] ([[User talk:JackkBrown|talk]]) 23:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Where is Kate?]] for deletion == |
|||
== Precious anniversary == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Nine}} |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Where is Kate?]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination)]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
== Solomonic Dynasty == |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:IgnatiusofLondon|IgnatiusofLondon]] (<span style="font-size:85%;">he/him</span> • [[User talk:IgnatiusofLondon#top|☎️]]) 11:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Go visit Japan's monarchy page, you will see the exact thing, it is generally agreed to add the empathizing mark () to distinct between legend which is not proved to historical fact as you pointed, the Japanese page has done it, i will do it: if you edit or revert it back it won't help anything but start a uncalled for edit conflict which is not necessary, i will want to to go and read the Japanese monarch page and come back to me [[User:CtasACT|CtasACT]] ([[User talk:CtasACT|talk]]) 03:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:It's irrelevant see [[WP:OTHERCONTENT]]. In any case it was only added to the Japan article in the last few days - it's gone now. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 08:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Recent reversions at "Legal System of Saudi Arabia" == |
|||
== Amhara people page == |
|||
You cite "unfamiliar terms". Are we "dumbing down" for the general population, as have done the newspapers? Why oppose a more accurate term if it is appropriate? Perhaps the average American dummies will refer to the dictionary (or Wiktionary), and be the better for it. Just curious. [[Special:Contributions/144.121.24.154|144.121.24.154]] ([[User talk:144.121.24.154|talk]]) 19:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hi, How come it was allowed to delete from the Wikipedia page of the Amhara about Amharas being heirs/descendants of the Aksum empire? Amhara historical heritage with Aksum is well backed yet an Arabic user name on Wikipedia (he now changed it to English his username is Socialwave597) completely removed everything without talking with anyone. It’s not the first time that he do such thing. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:A041:E19A:2600:9D67:A7C:3AB2:BC63|2A00:A041:E19A:2600:9D67:A7C:3AB2:BC63]] ([[User talk:2A00:A041:E19A:2600:9D67:A7C:3AB2:BC63|talk]]) 10:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Ha! Resisting changing from "male Polygamy" to "polygyny" is dumbing down! We have a global audience of one billion views per day. That article could be read by a teenager in Kenya whose 3rd language is English one day and a professor in Massachusetts the next day. If you're not willing to "dumb down" for the "general population" then you need to find a different hobby than Wikipedia. Mind you, I also wouldn't describe pointlessly expanding text without adding meaning (which is how I would describe the verbosity of some of your aditions)) as struggling against "dumbing down". But if you stay you need to follow our policies - that includes not adding text that is unsupported by the existing citation. That's a breach of [[WP:V]] as explained in [[WP:HIJACK]]. In future, if you have any points to make on edits on anrticle do so on the article talk page please. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 19:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:That's not an article I watch. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 20:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Fair enough. I still, however, oppose the notion that a writer within any context other than children's literature (I would venture to suggest that Wikipedia is for adult consumption by dint of its inherent nature...perhaps a "Kids Wiki" is called for?) should attempt to tailor his writing to his audience, but rather should hope of improving the minds of his audience by encouraging expansion of syntactic awareness and vocabulary. the reader should raise himself to the level of the literature, rather than the writer lowering himself to the level of a reader which he might imagine. I only contacted you directly, on your own talk page, because I am only interested in your own opinions as they pertain to this specific instance; I have no intent to clutter your personal space. Your complaint about the desirability of a reference is valid. my defense would be that the suggestion is entirely obvious. Thanks for the brief engagement, and take care. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/144.121.24.154|144.121.24.154]] ([[User talk:144.121.24.154#top|talk]]) 13:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Hi, in this discussion, so as not to create further misunderstandings, is it possible to change the title of the question? (spelled without dash, https://www.parmigianoreggiano.com/it/). JacktheBrown (talk) 23:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You cite "unfamiliar terms". Are we "dumbing down" for the general population, as have done the newspapers? Why oppose a more accurate term if it is appropriate? Perhaps the average American dummies will refer to the dictionary (or Wiktionary), and be the better for it. Just curious. 144.121.24.154 (talk) 19:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
