|
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:DeCausa/Archive 10) (bot
|
→Amhara people oag: new section
|
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Go visit Japan's monarchy page, you will see the exact thing, it is generally agreed to add the empathizing mark () to distinct between legend which is not proved to historical fact as you pointed, the Japanese page has done it, i will do it: if you edit or revert it back it won't help anything but start a uncalled for edit conflict which is not necessary, i will want to to go and read the Japanese monarch page and come back to me [[User:CtasACT|CtasACT]] ([[User talk:CtasACT|talk]]) 03:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
Go visit Japan's monarchy page, you will see the exact thing, it is generally agreed to add the empathizing mark () to distinct between legend which is not proved to historical fact as you pointed, the Japanese page has done it, i will do it: if you edit or revert it back it won't help anything but start a uncalled for edit conflict which is not necessary, i will want to to go and read the Japanese monarch page and come back to me [[User:CtasACT|CtasACT]] ([[User talk:CtasACT|talk]]) 03:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
:It's irrelevant see [[WP:OTHERCONTENT]]. In any case it was only added to the Japan article in the last few days - it's gone now. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 08:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
:It's irrelevant see [[WP:OTHERCONTENT]]. In any case it was only added to the Japan article in the last few days - it's gone now. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 08:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Amhara people oag == |
|||
Hi, How come it was allowed to delete from the Wikipedia page of the Amhara about Amhatas being heirs/descendants of the Aksum empire? Amhara historical heritage with Aksum is well backed yet an Arabic user name on Wikipedia (he now changed it to English his username is Socialwave597) completely removed everything without talking with anyone. It’s not the first time that he do such thing. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:A041:E19A:2600:9D67:A7C:3AB2:BC63|2A00:A041:E19A:2600:9D67:A7C:3AB2:BC63]] ([[User talk:2A00:A041:E19A:2600:9D67:A7C:3AB2:BC63|talk]]) 10:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Hello, how are you? I'm just dropping in because we edit some of the same pages, and I find it's good to understand a fellow editor beyond 'that person who keeps disagreeing with me'. Are you working on anything interesting at the moment? Best wishes, A.D.Hope (talk) 19:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| Nine years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Go visit Japan's monarchy page, you will see the exact thing, it is generally agreed to add the empathizing mark () to distinct between legend which is not proved to historical fact as you pointed, the Japanese page has done it, i will do it: if you edit or revert it back it won't help anything but start a uncalled for edit conflict which is not necessary, i will want to to go and read the Japanese monarch page and come back to me CtasACT (talk) 03:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, How come it was allowed to delete from the Wikipedia page of the Amhara about Amhatas being heirs/descendants of the Aksum empire? Amhara historical heritage with Aksum is well backed yet an Arabic user name on Wikipedia (he now changed it to English his username is Socialwave597) completely removed everything without talking with anyone. It’s not the first time that he do such thing. 2A00:A041:E19A:2600:9D67:A7C:3AB2:BC63 (talk) 10:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
