→Turkey: response
|
|
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:Huh? I object to the addition of unnecessary pointless clutter, not the percentages. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 23:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
:Huh? I object to the addition of unnecessary pointless clutter, not the percentages. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 23:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
::You are making edits not even aware of what you are changing? Did you see the footnotes? [[User:Bogazicili|Bogazicili]] ([[User talk:Bogazicili|talk]]) 23:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
::You are making edits not even aware of what you are changing? Did you see the footnotes? [[User:Bogazicili|Bogazicili]] ([[User talk:Bogazicili|talk]]) 23:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::Yesw, they are crap. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 23:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Go visit Japan's monarchy page, you will see the exact thing, it is generally agreed to add the empathizing mark () to distinct between legend which is not proved to historical fact as you pointed, the Japanese page has done it, i will do it: if you edit or revert it back it won't help anything but start a uncalled for edit conflict which is not necessary, i will want to to go and read the Japanese monarch page and come back to me CtasACT (talk) 03:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, How come it was allowed to delete from the Wikipedia page of the Amhara about Amharas being heirs/descendants of the Aksum empire? Amhara historical heritage with Aksum is well backed yet an Arabic user name on Wikipedia (he now changed it to English his username is Socialwave597) completely removed everything without talking with anyone. It’s not the first time that he do such thing. 2A00:A041:E19A:2600:9D67:A7C:3AB2:BC63 (talk) 10:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. What is that supposed to mean? Then who is watching it? Anyone can do what the hell they want? 2A00:A041:E19A:2600:816F:6687:EF54:CD17 (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! OrionNimrod (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you were objecting to the percentages, why did you do a full revert here [1], deleting the reliably sourced information in footnotes? Bogazicili (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]