|
HiEdipio! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC) |
Welcome to Wikipedia, Edipio! Thank you for your contributions. I am Hiàn and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!hiàn 20:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Edipio,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Foody Mart for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
SamHolt6 (talk) 00:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Brawl Stars Second Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Brawl Stars Second Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
| Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
 Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2020.
Current and upcoming events
September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Election reminder: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 December. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.
Drive and Blitz reports
June Blitz: An uncorrected typo (even copy editors make copy editing mistakes!) led to an eight-day "leap blitz" from 14 to 21 June, focusing on requests and articles tagged in May. 19 participating editors claimed 54 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Over 750,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event, keeping pace with the previous three self-isolated drives. Of the 38 people who signed up, 30 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 16 to 22 August, we copy edited articles tagged in June and July 2020 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 37 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
Other news
June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Baffle gab1978, Tdslk, Twofingered Typist, and first-time coordinator Puddleglum2.0. Reidgreg took a break after serving for a couple years. Thanks to everyone who participated! Progress report: As of 01:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 532 requests since 1 January and there were 38 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hi Edipio, you accepted a request made at the GOCE Requests page to copy-edit the article Dim sum. Your last edit to the article was at 14:06, 14 September 2020 and you haven't yet declared the copy-edit done on the Requests page. Please tell us whether the copy-edit is completed—or whether you intend to complete it—so the request can be archived, left alone or returned to the list for someone else to work on. If no update is received and you make no further edits to the article in seven days a GOCE coordinator will strike your acceptance and return the request to the list. Thank you. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
| Guild of Copy Editors December 2020 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2020.
Current and upcoming events
Election time: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before Auld Lang Syne. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: This will run from 13 to 19 December, and will target all Requests. Sign up now.
Drive and Blitz reports
September Drive: 67 fewer articles had copy-edit templates by this month's close. Of the 27 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and 124 articles were claimed for the drive. October Blitz: this ran from 18 to 24 October, and focused on articles tagged for copy-edit in July and August 2020, and all Requests. Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors copy-edited at least one article. 21 articles were claimed for the blitz. November Drive: Of the 18 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and together claimed 134 articles. At the close of the drive, 67 fewer articles were in the backlog and we had dealt with 39 requests.
Other news
Progress report: As of 09:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 663 requests (18 from 2019) since 1 January and there were 52 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 494 (see monthly progress graph above). Annual Report for 2020: this roundup of the year's activity at the Guild is planned for publication in late January or early February. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Seasonal tidings and cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 00:52, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]Hi Edipio: Right now Canada's Wonderland has not yet been able to confirm if the park will reopen to the general public by May 2021, but it did not open in 2020 due to COVID-19 pandemic (like other amusement, theme and water parks across Southern Ontario), and there has not been any updates on whether or not if the 2020 season tickets and passes which were extended to cover the park's 2021 season will be extended even further to cover the park's 2022 season as well, if the park is unable to open for the 2021 season due to the ongoing pandemic (but its still a possibility) which is why I tried to put this information up on Wikipedia earlier. [1]
I can probably assume that any amusement, theme and water parks in Southern Ontario might remain closed until COVID-19 vaccines are more widely available and herd immunity is established, so its possible that Canada's Wonderland might either have a shortened 2021 season or even remain closed until 2022 which could see those 2020 season tickets and passes extended again until 2022 when Canada's Wonderland is able to safely resume operations again after the COVID-19 pandemic is finally under control. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex (Brampton) (talk • contribs) 03:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Alex (Brampton) (talk) 03:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Edipio. Please revert this IP User's edit on my talk page. I am not using Twinkle or any other advanced anti-vandalism program. Please also block it before it destroys WP. Thanks! A21NX (talk) 07:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Im sorry pls dont be mean i dont wanna get blocked like on finnish wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theweekendfan101 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
--Britcouple007's Cam (talk) 04:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits were disruptive because they were non-constructive and appeared to spread false/unsourced information. You also assumed that Wikipedia members that were editing Food Basics had close ties with the corporation, and that does not appear to be true. Also, I am not sure what you mean by "inside or outside worker", "union or non-union", or how Flamborough, Ontario has anything to do with Food Basics or any "files" out there. You will need to back your claims of the "threats of insiders" or "Wikipedia friends" with reliable sources if you want this on Wikipedia or for anyone to believe this. Edipio | talk 05:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thanks for being a steadfast worker. I will endeavor to understand but will have to research how insider corporate accounts get more access and credibility here than independent reviewers. We both have a role but yours should not be to bully when there is an example between Food Basics and Flamborough, Ontario, can we move this to the talk page? Britcouple007's Cam (talk) 04:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Mz7 (talk) 19:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Edipio. Considering that there are many pages on Wikipedia about Grand Prix motorcycle racing at Indianapolis Motor Speedway, I thought there wasn't any need of sources for adding that information. Furthermore, the other motorsport events listed in that section (Indy 500, United States Grand Prix,...) have no sources; the page "Sports in Indiana" talks about it too... Reading the section, it seemed to me that Grand Prix motorcycle racing definitely needed to be added in the list.
I'm not a frequent writer on Wikipedia (I'm not even a registered user) but I've been writing for over five years and I was quite sure that my edit was correct. Anyway, you are more expert than me for sure, so I wrote my considerations but I leave to you the final decision about the topic.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.12.214.64 (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
hello, thanks for undoing that sock/impersonating account's edit on soviet war crimes, hes really annoying.UltraWikipedian (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! Thought i'd seek some help with my edits getting redacted. It kind of annoys me when someone removes my edits and is probably stubborn on only making their own edits visible and removing anything else. I often check the articles of footballers and edit football squad templates. Sadly, not everyone is nice enough to allow it and my edits keep getting redacted even though I firmly mentioned in my last edit that i'm not attempting any vandalism and even attached reference links yet they got removed this time.
Regards, SportingFan FC (talk) 17:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Replit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Python. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so I am the person who added the copy-edit" tag to the Olive, California article, and I want to personally thank you for finishing the copy-edit on the page, and doing everything correctly! Thanks again, feel free to hit up my talk page if you ever need any help editing. CharlieM1021 (talk) 15:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! In spite of my 'very terrible' habit, I'm gonna keep this very short in your unilateral interest: Why did you approve the lazy WP:ONLYREVERTbyFanardal without even bothering to investigate? They're a very familiar kind of creature to me. Replicating the edit-summaries of higher-UAL editors, falsely-marking their edits as "MINOR" or not having an ES whatsoever. Worse.. They don't even tolerate engagement on their UTP. All of that is cookie-cutter explained in the ES for my own request. I've suffered through these creatures for a period of time across sister-articles or others which are remotely-linked, some of whom have been de facto banned (suspended indefinitely), abandoned their SPAs and FORTUNATELY, a rare few who shifted their focus elsewhere. I don't want to be self-praising but being well aware of Wikipedia culture, as apparent from the very user-page designs and all: I guess as an IP editor, I should at least note that I filed for SPI against a fellow IP editor who turned-out to be just-another sock of a prolific WP:ADVOCACY warrior. And here, I pled for "pending changes" instead of the good ol' "semi-protection" because I had faith that at least senior-editors would be more aware and in spite of my life-experience to the contrary, would at least treat 2 editors at essentially the same-level as same WITHOUT false balance. Ymblanter promptly approved my request. But alas.. Turns out the status quo is far more rigid here than appreciating work-of-progress. Here are the case details, urge you to read it in full with calm-mind and enough-time. Regards. —111.223.26.156 (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I’m going to report the Phil Scott vandal right now. HelenDegenerate (talk) 01:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
When you reverted my article request, you said "no conspiracy allowed." What, exactly, did you mean by that? Bwrs (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box. Current events Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here. June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June. Drive and blitz reports January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results) February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results) March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results) April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results) May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results) Other news Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editorsat12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Hi Edipio, you are a great recent changes patroller, you have beaten me multiple times today on reverts, consider applying for rollback permissions. Also, you might want to answer some of the messages on your talk page. Justiyaya (talk) 22:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's best practice that trans people are known by the pronouns that they're now using or prefer. Here [1] you changed Cassandra Khaw's pronoun back away from "they", despite their well documented preferences. If you'd thought that wasn't documented well enough, that would have been one thing, but it seems like you just didn't like the change or felt it wasn't necessary? Please try and respect trans individuals identity. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 01:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
