Contents

User talk:F382d56d7a18630cf764a5b576ea1b4810467238: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:11, 8 February 2010

This page may contain some text written in the Serbian language.

Archives

I, II, III, IV

Hi, everyone! I just wanted to say hello, and to inform you that you can write to me here, and i will answer in the best possible way...

Best wish!!

• BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar

• Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century

• News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more

• In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?

• WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you reverted my edit to the article saying there was an unexplained removal of data. I was just wondering if this was a mistake as I re-added the removed infobox and picture that another editor had removed? I wasn't sure if it was vandalism or a mistake, by the other editor, but I thought it should be added back as no explanation was given for removal. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 12:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was mistake by TW, i was trying to revert ip user, not you! :) Sorry, user removed entire infobox and some data inside!

Sorry, and thank you! --Tadija (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay! I had considered reverting all of the IP's edits, but wasn't too sure if they were vandalism or not, so I thought I'd just add the removed infobox back. :) - JuneGloom07 Talk? 12:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good news. I am back. Open your eyes and see that Serbs were a rogue state in the 1990's when they caused the Yugoslav Wars and editing will be better all round. I can't do Kosovo/Balkan subjects at the minute but I will get the ban lifted soon. Human Rights Believer (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy

• Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community

• News and notes: New CTO, Britain Loves Wikipedia, Telefónica partnership, Multimedia and more

• In the news: Wikipedia on CDs, BBC uses Wikipedia content, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs

• Sister projects: Sister project roundup

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tadija,

Firstly, I'd like to thank you for your many valuable contributions to Wikipedia, and also for your kind words on the birth of my baby :-) However, would it be possible to take general admin concerns to WP:AN/I? I don't always have time to look into incidents with editors, and also by taking to the admin noticeboard it allows a number of admins review disruptive behaviour. This allows for maximum transparency, and also you'll probably get a quicker response :-)

I appreciate the trust you have shown me in telling me your concerns, I hope you can extend this respect and understanding to my above comments. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 00:24, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't go around reverting all contributions without looking at them first. Some of your reverts may be construed as an abuse of twinkle or even edit warring and reported as such. Polargeo (talk) 10:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i know, i was reverting one more blocked editor, so it looks like that in a wast number of vandal edits, i mistakenly revert a good edit. Do not offend! :) :) --Tadija (talk) 13:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. No problem, I'm not offended. Just wanted to indicate that not all of the edits were poor. :) Polargeo (talk) 08:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala ti puno srbine. Nastavimo da naucimo svet ko smo i sta smo! Ajdebre (talk · contribs)

Штo би oви peкли: "Let me check if I´m not dreaming ... I´m not! It´s a dream come trouth. Many thanx. ;) FkpCascais (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Sirogojno (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Images of Sirogojno (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:27, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_Liberation_Army&action=history

You reverted an edit by 86.163.198.190, but it says Reverted to revision 342218965 by 99.236.221.124; revert unexplained emoval of data. (TW). lol Twinkle screwed up99.236.221.124 (talk) 04:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for barnstar !