Contents

User talk:Fanaticaddict: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:42, 16 June 2024

Hi,

=> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_Boys%3A_Ride_or_Die&diff=1227471213&oldid=1227443803

There have already been complaints about content removal by you - could you please back up your reason for deletion of content by citing the corresponding Wikipedia policy or guideline?

=> Only include the release date of the country that made the movie. Unless it is a world premiere.

Whilst fully cognisant how unreasonable it would be to list any film's release information for all the countries in the world in the article's WP:Lead, I'm pretty sure though that people in countries other than the States would want to know about that film's release in their country - and those countries presumably deserve as much attention. In that particular case I listed release information for countries with sizeable population (and thus likely to contribute significantly to the film's box office revenue) and where the film in question was released BEFORE the North American domestic release. And even culturally, why should Britain, Germany, Australia and other countries be treated as second-echelon and less important?

For one other thing, your edit resulted in the reference for the film's information on The Numbers (website) which I added in my previous edit becoming orphaned (was restored by Wikipedia bot). At the very least you could have moved the deleted content to "Release" section of the article (which I've done myself earlier today)...

Szagory (talk) 07:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a simple rule. Even if it may have been released in other countries beforehand, we do not include those dates because they were not made by the country that made it. If only England made the film, then we'll only use the date it comes out in England ONLY. If only France made the film, we use the French date ONLY. And if only America made the project, then we shall use the American date ONLY. It is not an American thing, and it never was. It's a thing of having too much unnecessary information. Fanaticaddict (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppetofAksh 539 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Fanaticaddict (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never heard of this user that I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for in my life. I am not a sock puppet of this account. Looking at what the user has edited, I have never been to these pages and have never edited them, period. The original account was never made by me. I don't even know anything about and can't even login to this account that I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for. I feel like this might have been a mistake. However, I think I know why the person who banned me might consider this a sock puppet account. It could be possible that we have the same internet connection. If that is the case, then I would like to clarify that this account, and the account that this one is being accused of being a sockpuppet for, are not the same person. I would also like to clarify that I am not Spartan231297, as I saw on the person who blocked me's talk page that they were thinking this. I must point out that just because we visit and edit the same articles does not mean we are the same person.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have never heard of this user that I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for in my life. I am not a sock puppet of this account. Looking at what the user has edited, I have never been to these pages and have never edited them, period. The original account was never made by me. I don't even know anything about and can't even login to this account that I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for. I feel like this might have been a mistake. However, I think I know why the person who banned me might consider this a sock puppet account. It could be possible that we have the same internet connection. If that is the case, then I would like to clarify that this account, and the account that this one is being accused of being a sockpuppet for, are not the same person. I would also like to clarify that I am not Spartan231297, as I saw on the person who blocked me's talk page that they were thinking this. I must point out that just because we visit and edit the same articles does not mean we are the same person. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have never heard of this user that I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for in my life. I am not a sock puppet of this account. Looking at what the user has edited, I have never been to these pages and have never edited them, period. The original account was never made by me. I don't even know anything about and can't even login to this account that I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for. I feel like this might have been a mistake. However, I think I know why the person who banned me might consider this a sock puppet account. It could be possible that we have the same internet connection. If that is the case, then I would like to clarify that this account, and the account that this one is being accused of being a sockpuppet for, are not the same person. I would also like to clarify that I am not Spartan231297, as I saw on the person who blocked me's talk page that they were thinking this. I must point out that just because we visit and edit the same articles does not mean we are the same person. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have never heard of this user that I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for in my life. I am not a sock puppet of this account. Looking at what the user has edited, I have never been to these pages and have never edited them, period. The original account was never made by me. I don't even know anything about and can't even login to this account that I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for. I feel like this might have been a mistake. However, I think I know why the person who banned me might consider this a sock puppet account. It could be possible that we have the same internet connection. If that is the case, then I would like to clarify that this account, and the account that this one is being accused of being a sockpuppet for, are not the same person. I would also like to clarify that I am not Spartan231297, as I saw on the person who blocked me's talk page that they were thinking this. I must point out that just because we visit and edit the same articles does not mean we are the same person. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}