User talk:Fethroesforia: Difference between revisions

<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Face-smile-big.svg|left|60px]]

{{{1|[[User:Boris Johnson VC|Boris Johnson VC]]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! {{{2|}}}

</div><!-- Template:smile2 -->

Glad to see we both agree on a number of issues, i don't like Cameron either, though i'm hoping what he is saying is all retoric and he will forget all about it when he becomes PM! Boris Johnson is about the only politition who has the guts to speak his mind, and is not put off by the Labour PC crap. P.S. I woulden't worry too much about the guy moning about our user pages, i have seen FAR more provocative userpages, and anyway he's taking an ultra-extream interpritation of the rules! Boris for PM!!! Boris for President!!! Boris is the Messiah!!!--[[User:Boris Johnson VC|Boris Johnson VC]] 19:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

== Confused ==

I'm confused. First, I do appreciate your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fethroesforia&diff=next&oldid=103867186 replacing] the "I'd like to comment", but you reverted it a few hours later. Huh? Also, I'm not sure that changing "communist" to "anti-bnp" actually does anything but change who you're blaming vandalism against. Both comments are personal and advertise your personal political views and don't do it very nicely.

I'd also really appreciate your letting me know exactly what you thought was "hostile and nasty" in my previous comment on your talk page. In your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TStein&oldid=104039885#Warning response] on my talk page you seemed very upset that I had used part of a warning template, and used words like "inappropriate", "hostile" and "nasty" and accused me of bad faith. Not only was I offended by your response and your edit summaries on your user page, I am really, really confused as to what on earth you found inappropriate, hostile or nasty. I also have no idea what came accross as not assuming good faith. Did using the template, a mild good faith warning come accross that way? Did my suggestions for your talk page come accross as bad faith? I wasn't saying that you'd done anything wrong or warning you there, I was giving you advice and suggesting that you may want to change how you do certain things. It was advice and just that and written that way. The nature of advice is that you can take it or ignore it or take some and disregard parts of it.

I'd really appreciate an explanation as to what offeneded you so much that you felt the need to respond that harshly. Thanks. '''[[User:TStein|TStein]]'''