Hello Ems24! Welcome to the Classical Music project and thank you for joining. We look forward to working with you in the future --Jubilee♫clipman 03:04, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't bother with doing an AfD nomination for it. It's about to get speedy deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 04:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a good reason for undoing my edits here? An edit summary would've been nice too. —LOL T/C 05:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for noting where the material was copied from at Talk:Loras John Schissel. The material is noted as being copyrighted, and as such is a violation of wikipedia's copyright policies. That makes the article eligible for speedy deletion (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion). I've tagged it for deletion. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 12:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Symphonic Poems (Dvořák). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Antonin_Dvorak#Symphonic_poems. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Antonin_Dvorak#Symphonic_poems - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}tothe top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. -- Boing! said Zebedee 06:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:USS Monitor.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 13:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ems24, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of 2010 Biobío earthquakes - a page you tagged - because: Article is not a duplicate of an existing article. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. decltype (talk) 02:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you speedy work on tagging the talk page. --Merond e 21:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
