Contents

User talk:Jim1138

Welcome!

Hello, Jim1138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

I attempted to update the album information on AC/DC's wiki page, as it was incorrect. I own a copy of their album T.N.T. which was the Australian release in 1975, prior to the U.S. compilation album High Voltage in 1976. I was accused of being incorrect and making "unconsstructive edits", which I take offence to. What is going on?

__

It's a bot. It blocks people if it's bored or horny.. No — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.143.144 (talk) 13:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

pls tell me what was wrong with the redirection of Booty article

I agree with you that displayed, or was on display is better, or even was on exhibit. I was correcting the popular misuse of "hung" more so than the choice of word that was picked.

Thanks, Jim.]

Hi.

You're accusing the wrong guy for edit warring, please pay better attention next time.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.185.111 (talk • contribs)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Just delete "dirk dickbutt" it's obviously vandalism and should redirect to nothing. Wikipedia is full of rules nuts that make things too impractical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.123.230 (talk • contribs)

Please note that "hone in on" is plain wrong. It is a mistake for "home in". Even M-W says as much. 86.129.16.218 (talk) 03:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How true, thanks for the note. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim1138. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Andersons, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The two lines I deleted. the first is a false statement ", though her romantic relationship with Branden had already ended,[78]" is slanderous, and does not appear in the book in question. "78. Britting 2004, p. 101" please allow me to delete it. the second line that I deleted is also not true,"Rand underwent surgery for lung cancer in 1974 after decades of heavy smoking.[83]" it supposedly appears in an unauthorized biography emphisis on unauthorized, I cannot find the actual book to see if it actually appears there or not, but it is absoultely not true, Ayn Rand never had cancer at all. www.aynrand.com please allow me to delete it also, thank you for reading. My name is John. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.56.198.40 (talk) 08:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My advice (following wp:consensus (please read) ) would be to discuss it on talk:Ayn Rand. Add reliable sources to support your arguments. Go with the consensus. Given that others have disagreed with your changes, and to avoid an wp:edit war, I would suggest avoiding making further edits until consensus is reached. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page yesterday! Sorry this is late, but I didn't realise the vandal had done it twice. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 08:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still new to the magnificent magnitude of Wiki editing, and not as competent late at night or after absence. Thanks for the kind reminder of basics -- capitalize only first word of section title. I went back over old contributions and even fixed others' typos. Consider a star reward here too. AnEyeSpy (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to avoid any misunderstanding, I deleted the consideration for deletion; the page has already been deleted and there is no requirement to discuss whether it should get deleted or not. In the future, I will provide an explanation if I do this, so thank you for alerting me. For your information, I created that page and wished to delete it, because the issue was not relevant anymore.

Thanks.

Hi Jim, what was wrong with the redirect of Global Radio news to GRNlive? I work for the company, and the name has changed fairly recently. Cooksey (talk) 10:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry about that. Didn't realise the procedure. Thanks very much. Cooksey (talk) 10:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What information would be needed for the Magic Mack! article not to be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JacksonAnderson1234 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is quite well written. As there is not too many releases, that wp:notability is an issue. In other words, I don't know. Good luck! Jim1138 (talk) 10:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Also, does this mean that I can remove the "This article is being considered for deletion" banner over the page now?

Never mind. I just read the article about how pages get deleted and how they stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JacksonAnderson1234 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For reverting the vandalism to my user page last night. Thanks! Mr. Vernon (talk) 14:28, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this discussion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:125.205.77.232#Cancellation_of_vandalism_which_...

JoshuSasori (talk) 08:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This business with Akira Takarada started again. You don't need to notify me of actions. JoshuSasori (talk) 07:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that he is Jaffa and Rattigan on the Japanese language DVD per references 4, 5, & 6 which are Disney Japan reference. Perhaps it should be mentioned that role is the Japanese language dub. I will leave it as-is. Jim1138 (talk) 07:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He was removing it before, now is adding it back. I'm confused. I requested another block and added his Block history in Japan. Jim1138 (talk) 08:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not amend my edits to the First Cymru and Crossgates Coaches pages. Bus services are not the easiest thing to source due to their constantly changing nature. Please trust that I know what I am doing when I edit these pages. You can see a press release reflecting my changes from the First Cymru website at http://www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/south_west_wales/travel_news/service_updates/?item=5781&conf=0. Crossgates Coaches have ceased to operate local services as of this week so that is my reasoning for removing the table of services, in fact this is referenced in the article by another user! There are no sources to confirm this however, but an enthusiast's Yahoo Group (Welsh Bus News) makes reference to the fact in this post: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/welsh-bus-news/message/26057 Paulravuslanterna (talk) 09:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	HELLO FRIEND, I AM VERY S-O-R-R-Y for what ever i did, i feel ashamed for myself and understood my mistakes, please keep up the G O O D works. THANK YOU. Tamanna 3 (talk) 11:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday I edited an article of David DeFeis, I removed his birth of year and now it's back there (and wrong btw). Well I happened to know him (very well) and that he doesn't want to publish his year of birth. I also emailed to him, and like I said.... well, here's the answer:

"All of our birthday information is not for public consumption...whether the date is right or wrong...We are all very private people."

So can you respect his will/wish and remove that year, permanently?

DeFeis (talk) 12:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting Vandalism on my Talk Page =) Fox2k11 (talk) 02:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you put the show that is coming to Nick Jr? They're are not gonna show it on september 3. It's trash — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.10.249.147 (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit as you did not leave an wp:edit summary which lets people know why you removed what you did. As many people do similar things to vandalize pages, try to let people know that you are not vandalizing by leaving a meaningful reason on the edit summary. A link to the current show line up would be quite helpful to check the verifiablity (please read) of the changes. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 03:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What if the shows not coming to nick jr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.10.249.147 (talk) 03:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a link to a website where you are getting that information, please add it to the page. Maybe something like <ref>[http://www.nickjr.com/New_shows Nick jr new shows]</ref> (not the correct link btw) Then, when you remove the content, put "Updated page to current source: Nick jr new shows". That way people can check for themselves and your edits less likely to be removed. Good luck Jim1138 (talk) 03:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the revert on my page. So sad that that sort of hatred appears to be a part of that IP's inherent personality. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, Please let me know why you removed an external link I added to the page XML firewall. The link I added similar to the existing links, but the offer is from a different vendor. Thank you, Jimmy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.37.201 (talk) 04:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out the other spam links which I just removed. If you see more, let me know! See wp:el for external link policy. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am a genetically modified organism. I am not an artificial mutant.

I demand that you address my claim of being a genetically modified organism. I am a modification of my parents, and because of recessive genes, I am different from both of them.

You are being disruptive for curtailing a simplification of terms.

142.59.48.238 (talk) 05:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drop your threat or curtail your activity! 142.59.48.238 (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is where to file the complaint Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Jim1138 (talk) 05:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an artificial mutant. Nice try. Complaints on noticeboards disappear. You hav been interfering with precision, which iz disruptive in an organization that prides itself on English skills. I am a genetic modification of my parents, and owing to recessive genes, I am different from both. I am a product of selective breeding, which wuz the choice of my parents, therefore I am a GMO in literal terms. I am not an artificial mutant. The only thing that stops me from putting User:Jim1138 into :category:GMO is that GMO haz been defined az something other than what it literally is. I am not an artificial mutant. 142.59.48.238 (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You hav one hour to produce administrative dissent with my simplification of language.142.59.48.238 (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANDi iz an artificial mutant. Genetically Modified Organism is a weasel term. 142.59.48.238 (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the source is wikipedia list of vegetarians. see - even Jesus and apostles were vegetarians... yes, I'll add a link there for a whole list (those Hitler is non-veg - he killed many saints and vegetarians - there is a proof that he killed, sentenced to death oldest European vegetarian union in Germany.

Here it is: List of vegetarians

I want to make a small version of the list, so people know who are vegetarians and don't kill animals in name of religion culture etc... Even Bible says - "do not kill, flesh and blood - do not eat"... but people have so many slaughterhouses... see? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoGandhi (talk • contribs) 09:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I seee. My task is as tough as that of Gandhi. He wanted to stop wars and animal killing, and Gandhi was killed. So you wanna kill me man? THan you'll go to prison and hell, sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoGandhi (talk • contribs) 09:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Man are you crazy? I myself added those content to vegetarianism navbox. You might go and take rest, I think your brain is working bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoGandhi (talk • contribs) 09:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the articles you added the template to mostly have little to do with vegetarianism. Issac Newton, while an occasional vegetarian and an absolute genius in some areas, would make an amusing spokesperson for a vegetarian movement. Would you really want to list him as a vegetarian? Your username and this leads to the conclusion that you are pushing your own agenda. See WP:NOTPROMOTION. Your addition of the File:Cannibals.23232.jpg image does not contribute to the topic, is intended to gross people out, and is vandalism. Why not add File:penis.jpg or something similar? You really see yourself as Gandhi? Also, is your language above in line with Gandhi? Perhaps you should change your user name to something more appropriate? I could suggest a few. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the immediate revert of the blanking of my Ananny sock page here. I put that page up for my own use because I was surprised to notice recently that Ananny material was being deindexed, and even deleted under OTRS. It didn't take Ananny long to find it, but I didn't expect anyone else to notice it. Meters (talk) 19:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 09:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Save it where it was.THEY WERE DRUNK AND I saw it on stickam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.149.16.13 (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni pruning went well just now at St Stepeh's. What do you think about removing all that are not explicitly cited in accordance with the tag {{alumni}}?Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using wp:huggle, I see someone add to the list then check the list for red links. Need a tool that removes red links from the lists of people. At least List of Yale University people is longer. Harvard University#Alumni is shorter or at least more compact. I would say that the articles in the list need pruning; and would be an undertaking. I and not really the person to ask, but would probably leave the list alone per wp:lists of people. I would say there are far more important Wikipedia issues anyway. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~SIghs~ there probably are, but obsession is a wonderful thing! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Banhammer exercised. . Mjroots (talk) 08:25, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I start talking like that, drill some holes thru my head with a 1-1/4" spade bit? A dull one would be preferable... Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim! I've noticed you're joined the revert-fest over 123.49.18.155's poorly sourced updates to Bangladesh religious composition. I've commented on User Talk:Materialscientist and Talk:Bangladesh. I think there are better numbers, but request comment before BOLDLY editing being reverted and trouted. Thanks! --Robert Keiden (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, Jim. I see that you have reverted an image addition by User:Jared Kofsky here with the comment "rv overuse of image". This new editor is adding his photos to hundreds of articles, in many cases repetitively, with little or no regard to relevance, subject or caption notability or the quality of the photos. Can you advise me as to whether there is a policy being violated? I would like to give him a warning and slow down this onslaught. I wouldn't regard it as deliberate vandalism, but for the most part it is not beneficial to WP. I am unable to keep up with the reversions and modifications needed, and other than you, I don't see anyone else helping. I will watch here for a reply. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 08:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Try talking to him. He does seem a bit overenthusiastic. There is Template:Uw-image1 and Template:Uw-disruptive1, but a "I think you are putting these photos on too many pages..." would be by far the best place to start. Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will try that, though I would rather be able to cite a specific prohibition that applies to such a situation. Hertz1888 (talk) 08:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many ways you can "do it wrong" that it would seem unlikely to be set in policy. A list: Wikipedia:Images#See also Could suggest s/he join Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media Jim1138 (talk) 08:37, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That too is helpful. I have left a message, and we shall see whether it stems the tide. Best wishes, Hertz1888 (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your great contributions on reverting vandalism. Keep up the good work. Torreslfchero (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim,

I have been editing Wikipedia articles for some time but I am not as proficient as you are. I have noticed that you deleted the "issues and problems" section I have added to Flipkart. I have two questions to ask regarding this. 1. The source I have quoted there is from a publication on a business and entrepreneurship blog that has been running for the last five years. I understand that linking to a blog might not be acceptable to Wiki standards. If that is the case, there are other references in the article that link to blogs like this one <http://www.watblog.com/2012/08/08/flipkart-hits-100cr-mark-in-july-2012-while-flyte-garners-600k-downloads-in-5-months/> too, which should have been deleted in the same vein. May I know if it is fine to add blogs when the tone is positive but not so when the section of article is critical of the subject. 2. I also observed that the whole section of "issues and problems" was deleted, after removing the link. If the tone of article was wrong, a suggestion to correct it, based on Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view would have helped, rather than deleting the entire section, effectively killing the criticism.Thank you. Dsrivallabha (talk) 16:26 IST, 3 September 2012. —Preceding undated comment added 10:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, I hope you don't mind me replying instead. Dsrivallabha, as far as I know, we don't add "criticism" sections unless a reputed newspaper or news agency reports it. Thank you. Ryoga Godai (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello iam Stelios Constantas and i dont need a source!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.109.6.229 (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Stelios .. Well, yes, you do need a source, we have no way of insuring you are Stelios. Everything on Wikipedia is subject to our five pillars, which includes WP:V. However, the one source already in the article does in fact use a C, and not a K, and I've made the correction. In fact, it's my fault that this wasn't corrected earlier, at some point in the past I added a reference to that article and didn't notice the error. Please note that the error is repeated at the Dutch, German wikipedias and I have not corrected those articles. Our interwiki links therefore should continue to have the "wrong" spelling until those encyclopedias are corrected, so that we at least link to the articles in question. I'm sure that will all get sorted out pretty quick. My apologies for the error. Best, --j⚛e decker^talk 20:54, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Joe, that was a fast fix. I was about to request a page move. Also added a link to the Eurovision song contest. Jim1138 (talk) 21:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks! --j⚛e decker^talk 21:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work specially when using HG to revert vandalism on Wikipedia:STiki! That gave me a laugh xD -- Cheers, Riley Huntley talk 02:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Posted television ratings (2001 - 2012) to these pages are copyright to OzTAM Pty Ltd and need to be removed. The previous years' data is not copyright to OzTAM. Spencer Anne (talk) 07:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.Wikipediania (Stalk • Talk) 09:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Failure
	You are such a worst admin Playtime94 (talk) 09:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I may be the worst admin ever, but at least I've been promoted to admin! Do I get to display the mop now? Jim1138 (talk) 09:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)Yeah Jim, you are such a worst admin! Haha... Oh that one's gold! -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 11:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that mean we give you a bucket, but no mop. I like it, the power of the Huggle. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Classic :D And I came here to thank you for dealing with the LOLs on my talk page by a sockpuppet of someone I blocked (a lot of it sounded like "I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!" kind of trolling) Orderinchaos 10:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HI.....I WAS DELETED WITH SOME CONTRIBUTION ABOUT CHILEAN PUNKS BANDS...I KNOW BETTER BECAUSE I PLAY IN SQUAD, THE QUINTESENTIAL CHILEAN CROSSOVER PUNK BAND. WE STARTED EVRYTHING HERE..SO A NEUTRAL?..I DO NOT UNDERSTAND — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris squad (talk • contribs) 19:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia, putting flamboyant words such as "most influential" is not in an encyclopedic tone and should be avoided also the use of all capital letters "MUERTE A LOS HIPPIES" should be avoided. See wp:allcaps. Use "Muerte a los Hippies" instead. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS JIM..I UNDERSTAND..BUT NOW I'M AFRAID TO ADD SOME VALUABLE INFORMATION ANYMORE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris squad (talk • contribs) 20:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to post information in the talk page such as talk:Chilean rock and ask others for their opinion on including it in the article. Generally, if you are posting information that benefits your group, it probably should not be put in the article. Peruse wp:five pillars for more info, or feel free to put {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask a question underneath. A volunteer will answer your question on that page. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 22:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, would you please review the entry you made here. This is a new user, making his first edit to an article. It seems like a good faith entry to me, even though he failed to provide sources. I'm assuming you hit the wrong button by error. Please correct your entry and apologize to the user, who seems a bit stunned and has stopped editing. Otherwise, it will appear like you have committed some egregious errors, biting new comers, moving straight to a level 4 warning without moving through the intermediate stages, and so on. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 01:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... I see he has resumed editing using different accounts. This should have been avoidable. --Epipelagic (talk) 01:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was with this edit Diff where he removed sourced content and replaced it with contradictory, unsourced content. Seems like POV pushing to me. Big problem brewing? Jim1138 (talk) 01:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why Huggle gave the level 4 warning. Might be due to his COI warning. I apologized and changed it to a level 2. Also queried about the issue. Sorry it took so long, read your comment too fast. Jim1138 (talk) 03:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's good :) --Epipelagic (talk) 04:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by that. --Epipelagic (talk) 07:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop edit warring and removing other peoples comments as you did on the JewWatch talk page. as you stated yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by WitsBlomstein (talk • contribs) 13:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, you removed content from a closed section (per: wp:NOTFORUM) talk page. Then you added content to the same talk page. I did two reverts to two different items. That is two single reverts: not edit warring not even 1RR let alone 3RR. Stop editing closed sections at is stated at the top of the section. Closed means closed. Do not modify means don't edit. Jim1138 (talk)

Firstly, I restored a comment since you can actually check the history of said article. you removed conent from a closed section. so yes by your own logic you did wrong. and then by simular logic you added content by the same talk page. I did two reverts to two different items. stop editing closed sections and remove conent from a closed discussion as you did with the one I reverted. do not modify means dont edit. you edited.WitsBlomstein (talk) 01:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I restored the content of the closed section as it was before you edited it twice. Once you removed other's comments after the section was closed. The second time, you added content after the section was closed. It would seem that three disagree with you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your correction of a certain re-direct is absolutely accurate and greatly appreciated. For this, I have bought you a beer. Enjoy! Gallion620 (talk) 15:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to (talk)

Moved to User talk:68.32.56.94) Jim1138 (talk) 06:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I didn't remove any content from 2012–13 Newcastle United F.C. season. I'm not into football; so, i wouldn't care anyway. -_- Ayushfri13 (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jim1138, I completely apologize for my clumsy efforts to enhance the Robert Moses Niagara Hydroelectric Power Station article. I know a great deal about the Niagara Falls operations but very little about Wikipedia, but the best way to learn is to give it a shot. I have added more to the talk section today. I will work on references over time as I can. Please migrate anything to the article when and how you see fit - I will restrict my efforts to just the talk page. I don't know how to go about inviting others to comment and I'm afraid to try and make the kind of mistakes I just did and insult someone, so it would be great if you could ping them to review and comment on what I have so far.

I haven't and don't intend to write anything in any other article and wish to remain anonymous, so I hope my lack of an ID is not a problem (using public wifi that downtown residents all use here). In any case, what I or anyone else writes needs to stand up to verification and logic anyway, regardless of who wrote something.

Thanks for your help and patience!