→thank you: new section
|
→NASA GAR: new section
|
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Thanks for creating the radiation template, I like :) [[User:Rror|Rror]] ([[User talk:Rror|talk]]) 10:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for creating the radiation template, I like :) [[User:Rror|Rror]] ([[User talk:Rror|talk]]) 10:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
== NASA GAR == |
|||
hi Jonverve, I just wanted to let you know that the main [[NASA]] article is undergoing a [[Talk:NASA/GA1|Good Article Review]]. Most of the gruntwork is done now, and the article could use a fresh set of eyes to copy edit it, add more materiel, and offer suggestions and feedback. If you have a chance, I would appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks!<br/>— [[User:Ohms law|Ω]] ([[User talk:Ohms law|talk]]) 22:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC) |
Do you mind joining our club? :) --Michael Romanov (talk) 19:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jonverve,
I just wanted to come here and say nice work on Template:NASA navbox, so far.
Keep it up! :)
Ω (talk) 23:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jonverve. Just wanted to let you know that this edit added an error to the template. If you want the template to be autocollapsed, please use "state=hide" instead. Thanks. Brian Everlasting (talk) 11:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It appears you are a NASA employee. Be sure to read the guidelines on paid editing. Brian Everlasting (talk) 11:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to say nice job on the ADHD template. Sifaka talk 18:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I've transferred you link to Synthetically thinned aperture radar from RadartoRadar configurations and types article. The list of types of radars is extensive and that is the sub-article where they must be linked. Pierre cb (talk) 20:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jonverve. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Intuit: The Center for Intuitive and Outsider Art, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion G12 because of the following concern: only a portion of the article was copied from the website you identified, so I removed that portion without deleting the entire article. Thanks for helping to detect copyright infringements. Regards R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for creating the radiation template, I like :) Rror (talk) 10:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
hi Jonverve, I just wanted to let you know that the main NASA article is undergoing a Good Article Review. Most of the gruntwork is done now, and the article could use a fresh set of eyes to copy edit it, add more materiel, and offer suggestions and feedback. If you have a chance, I would appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks!
— Ω (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]