Contents

User talk:Jonverve: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:58, 3 August 2009

Do you mind joining our club? :) --Michael Romanov (talk) 19:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jonverve,
I just wanted to come here and say nice work on Template:NASA navbox, so far.
Keep it up! :)
Ω (talk) 23:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jonverve. Just wanted to let you know that this edit added an error to the template. If you want the template to be autocollapsed, please use "state=hide" instead. Thanks. Brian Everlasting (talk) 11:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you are a NASA employee. Be sure to read the guidelines on paid editing. Brian Everlasting (talk) 11:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you missed the point on what I was trying to do. I just put in "autocollapsed" instead of "autocollapse", which allows me to not affect all the pages that use the template, but allow the template to be forced to collapsed or not collapse on certain pages. --Jonverve (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say nice job on the ADHD template. Sifaka ^talk 18:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'd had such a thing on my to-do list (never having done one), and suddenly it just appeared! Thank you. - Hordaland (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've transferred you link to Synthetically thinned aperture radar from RadartoRadar configurations and types article. The list of types of radars is extensive and that is the sub-article where they must be linked. Pierre cb (talk) 20:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sounds good!   Jonverve  ^{Talk  Contrib}  20:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jonverve. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Intuit: The Center for Intuitive and Outsider Art, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion G12 because of the following concern: only a portion of the article was copied from the website you identified, so I removed that portion without deleting the entire article. Thanks for helping to detect copyright infringements. Regards R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the radiation template, I like :) Rror (talk) 10:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi Jonverve, I just wanted to let you know that the main NASA article is undergoing a Good Article Review. Most of the gruntwork is done now, and the article could use a fresh set of eyes to copy edit it, add more materiel, and offer suggestions and feedback. If you have a chance, I would appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks!
— Ω (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ivy League (colloquialism), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivy League (colloquialism). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Work permit (talk) 02:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grace Community Church (Maryland) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jonverve, I noticed here that you use a template to append your signature on comments of yours. I would like to point out that per WP:SIG#NT, using transcluded templates for your signature (or using parserfunctions in your signature) is forbidden for a number of reasons. It seems you are doing this to bypass the software-imposed 255 character length limit, something that is also discouraged for several reasons. I would like to ask that you please switch back to using a non-templated signature, and I can request an AWB run to substitute current instances of your signature prior to deleting the sig template for you. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 05:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test   Jonverve  ^Talk  _Contrib  06:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Jonverve  ^{Talk  Contrib}  06:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving me the heads up about the signature policy and no transclusion. I fixed it. So now I pointed to User:Jonverve/sig instead of User:Jonverve/sig2. If you wanted to do the AWB stuff you talked about and to delete the sig2, go for it. Thanks for info!!   Jonverve  ^{Talk  Contrib}  06:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I can't do the AWB run myself (or rather, I don't have the knowledge to do so), but I can request someone else to do it for me. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 09:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AWB run done (courtesy of User:Collectonian), page deleted - thanks for your cooperation, and please don't hesitate to ask if you need any assistance in the future! ;) 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 22:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GW… 18:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]