|
3RR
|
|
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:No offense, but you really should open yourself to the possibility that experienced editors understand Wikipedia better than you do. Experienced editors understand that just because Wikipedia contains something, doesn't mean it ''should''. There's all manner of crap around here that nobody's noticed or done anything about yet. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 22:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC) |
:No offense, but you really should open yourself to the possibility that experienced editors understand Wikipedia better than you do. Experienced editors understand that just because Wikipedia contains something, doesn't mean it ''should''. There's all manner of crap around here that nobody's noticed or done anything about yet. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 22:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== 3RR == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Cape Cod|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Cape Cod]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 01:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks for uploading Image:Beach 1 - Medl.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Before you put too much work into this, you should know it's likely to be deleted. However your best bet is to source the article. Where are you getting your information from? If this guy's music has gotten significant media coverage, this should probably prevent any deletion. Friday (talk) 18:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are you promoting Bill Mallia because you work for Leftshore Studio? You may wish to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Friday (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The concept you need to understand is Wikipedia:Attribution. Being an encyclopedia, we use sources. If you were to attend a concert, for example, Wikipedia is not the place to publish a review of it. We don't do what we call original research, instead we depend on other sources that have done the research. Friday (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
