|
m Notes on rev control
|
m erased some old chit chat
|
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a test comment to see if page format returns to normal with a comment. mirwin |
|||
---- |
|||
[[foundation ontology]] A test link so I can find out what all the excitement, controversy and stress on the communnity is all about. mirwin |
|||
:also suggested for this is [[Talk:Philosophical movements]], [[philosophy of action]] (least controversial name for [[body philosophers]]). |
|||
----- |
|||
Important note for all sysops: There is a bug in the administrative move feature that truncates the moved history and changes the edit times. Please do not use this feature until this bug is fixed. More information can be found in the talk of [[user talk:Brion VIBBER|Brion VIBBER]] and [[user talk:maveric149|maveric149]]. Thank you. --[[user:maveric149|maveric149]] |
|||
----- |
----- |
||
Here is a link to all of your contributions. [http://www.wikipedia.com/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=Mirwin&days=200&limit=1000] Look at the URL, all you have to do is edit it manually. The "list all" behaviour was removed for performance issues. --[[User:Maveric149|mav]] 23:59 Jul 30, 2002 (PDT) |
Here is a link to all of your contributions. [http://www.wikipedia.com/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=Mirwin&days=200&limit=1000] Look at the URL, all you have to do is edit it manually. The "list all" behaviour was removed for performance issues. --[[User:Maveric149|mav]] 23:59 Jul 30, 2002 (PDT) |
||
Here is a link to all of your contributions. [1] Look at the URL, all you have to do is edit it manually. The "list all" behaviour was removed for performance issues. --mav 23:59 Jul 30, 2002 (PDT)
This is interesting analysis of the ethics underlying dominant positions on the abortion debate: http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9602/articles/bottum.html Be interesting to find out the authors take on the controversy regarding WTO/UN economists concluding that life is cheaper in some countries (as evidenced by unwillingness to mandate spending to avoid pollution) and thus it is reasonable and economically justifiable to export polluting industries. user:mirwin
Notes regarding revision control
Hi Zoe,
I hope you decide to shrug off the negative interactions and stick around.
I am preparing a proposal that Wikipedia shift to a text review approach that would leave current material intact as the primary article until a couple of logged in users have reviewed a proposed change version and ok'd it as improved.
Do you think this approach would reduce friction currently resulting from others editing or reviewing your work?
Do you think the exciting immediacy of a Wiki, i.e. seeing editing efforts published immediately to the internet would be diminished?
Other comments or pros and cons as you see them?
Thanks! user:mirwin
I don't know ... I think that delay thing would be really frustrating to a lot of people. Besides, it isn't the fract that people were changing my work -- as I keep saying, I don't care about that, as long as they're accurate. But it was the fact that my work was looked down upon as unworthy of being in the 'pedia. -- Zoe
