User talk:Renamed user efB5zCgPvkrQ7C: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:38, 11 January 2012

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Facial symmetry in dogs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HAHAHAHAH!!! That's awesome. --Moni3 (talk) 03:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no ! My favorite Wiki image, had by the bureaucracy! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User_talk:Ceoil#RFC.2FU SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you can be persuaded to take a wikibreak-break... Action potential has been nominated for a featured article review here. The help of an expert would be invaluable! Geometry guy 00:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Potential for action for the Riggr family! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We're a little stiff right now [and get your mind out of the gutter, please—this isn't the constantly devolving TFMWNCB's page; I mean look at me, I'm at the top of my game; what's it gonna be, SG?—corpulent or corpsulent?—you've come a long way baby]; we're on our last legs, so to speak; if these joints are lockin', don't come a-knockin' (or, again in reference to my portrait, if this joint ain't smokin', don't come a-tokin').

Plus, we don't remember what involvement we had with this article, suggesting our axons could use a lube job. Riggr Mortis (talk) 01:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for sloth; see User talk:Yomangani#Blocked for sloth to appeal your case. And don't put my mind in the gutter just to tell me to get it out of the gutter again! And keep 'yer lube to 'yerself! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right too. I know certian amongst our community believe that we should give creedence to thoes who, although have proven ability and a track record of years, bla bla, have been inactive for a few weeks. My considered openion is, you know, fuck that. Block all of them, give their FA's to me, make their friends kneel, and make me admin. Ceoil ^sláinte 01:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should extend the block for the suggestive things that stiff guy said to me. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me thats two against one; ie consensus. Blocked until 2031. Anyone else (not around at the moment) think they are hard enough to take me on? Ceoil ^sláinte 01:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think the two of you could make so many bad puns; might need an SPI to see if it's really you, or if socks are imitating your socks. Knock your socks off. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One too many pun from me, I think. Block reduced to till 2029. Ceoil ^sláinte 02:13, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've gone soft. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naw, my last statement was for show only. The fucker is blocked until 2031, and no mistake. If he is foolish enough to take this to a pity board, to the bleeding hearts on AN/I, i can show that diff, while a friend of ours oversights this one. You have done this before, right? Ceoil ^sláinte 02:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're asking our friend to oversight your going soft. Don't worry; no one will know. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have fundamentaly misunderstood my last post. Hurmp! Unless you want to spend the next 3 years signing as Sandyriggr.....Ceoil ^sláinte 03:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia, did you block this user from editing his or her talk page too? That is against policy unless you are an artist. We haven't heard from this user in a long time, so I'm thinking you did. That's ok, SandyGeorgia, I assume good faith, and I forgive you, and I know that you will not repeat egregious mistakes like that in the future. We can't afford to loose any more god editors. Yours, Riggr Mortis (talk) 03:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it was Mr. Sláinte who extended your block til 2029; if you can come down out of your tree by then, and if Wiki is still around, I will consider Mr. Riggr's {{unblock}} request. Unless I'm bribed first with a song ... Mr. Sláinte has been neglectful, and the Riggr family put up a picture of me that wasn't flattering when I read said person's article. A ban may be required. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 08:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While I dont want to talk ill of one who will not have right of reply for another 19 years, this 'un was trouble and never no good. Meanwhile, you now have a better pic, and there is a tune here. Ceoil (talk) 23:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice pic, but that is one depressing song! Methinks you're trying to leave the RiggrOut so you can be No. 1. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Am I really that obvious? What alerted you; the 19 yr block or me calling him never no good to nobody. Sandy, this guy is just no good for you! Sorry the tune was depressing dear, normal transmission soon. Ceoil (talk) 00:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outrigger,

I like the page you created on beaks. I edit many bird articles and I have linked around 100 to your page. Thanks, Bruinfan12 (talk) 05:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I miss when things were fun. I miss when I had friends. Bye. Riggr Mortis (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]